NetScaler vs Radware LinkProof comparison

NetScaler and Radware are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. NetScaler is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Radware is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. NetScaler holds a 15.5% mindshare in ADC, compared to Radware’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of NetScaler users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Radware users who would recommend it.

NetScaler

Read 107 NetScaler reviews

8,253 Views
5,977 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Radware LinkProof

Read 5 Radware LinkProof reviews

385 Views
289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetScaler

Radware LinkProof

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Radware LinkProof and NetScaler are competing in the application delivery controller market. NetScaler seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set.

Features: Radware LinkProof excels in traffic management, WAN optimization, and DNS management, ensuring efficient bandwidth use and reliable application access. NetScaler provides advanced load balancing, global server load balancing, and a comprehensive security architecture, making it ideal for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Radware LinkProof could enhance its security features, expand integration options, and improve scaling capabilities. NetScaler may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing its cost, and streamlining configuration options for less complex setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Radware LinkProof is known for its easy deployment and dependable customer service, fitting well with smaller setups. NetScaler, while offering more complex deployment, supports users with exhaustive resources and technical support for detailed setups.

Pricing and ROI: Radware LinkProof is more cost-effective for budget-conscious businesses with lower initial costs and faster ROI. NetScaler may require a greater upfront investment but delivers value through enhanced performance and features, appealing to businesses seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetScaler

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

107

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (4th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (11th)

Radware LinkProof

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of NetScaler is 15.5%, up from 14.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Radware LinkProof is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

DEMİRHAN ÇAVUŞOĞLU

Cloud Consultant at Migros Ticaret A.Ş.

A tool for centralized management including inventory and sales tracking

Citrix ADM has the ability to implement policies to tighten security. For instance, you can restrict access to your network from outsiders or lack necessary security measures such as antivirus programs. Additionally, there's the Delivery Controller, which allows for comprehensive monitoring and management tasks such as remote restarts, maintenance, and registration. Another essential component is the Director, which provides detailed insights into sessions, including identifying session failures, connection issues, user lockouts, etc. It presents a list of problems to address, enabling you to click on them and resolve them efficiently.

Read full review

Saurabh-Pal

Sr. Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

Supports link load balance and has good stability

One person can do the configuration for Radware LinkProof, but more people will be needed to complete the configuration on time if you have multiple devices. Some people have a virtual license, while others have a license that needs to be upgraded. Depending upon the location, one or more technical persons are required for the solution's maintenance. Many people use Radware LinkProof, and it is available for small, medium, and enterprise businesses. I would not recommend Radware LinkProof to anyone because it only supports load balance, not DoS and WAF. If you have larger offices in different locations, you can use Radware LinkProof inside your offices. However, if you introduce it in a space open to the internet, you will have to use a separate device for DDoS and WAF. Overall, I rate Radware LinkProof an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution improves security performance."

"Easy, user-friendly setup with content switching and integrated caching features."

"We appreciate that this solution facilitates our access to Citrix internet."

"The GSLB feature allows us to move services between data centers. We can do this in either a planned or unplanned manner. We have experienced service provider outages at our primary data center and GSLB will kick in to automatically modify DNS records to point to a secondary data center (active/passive). We also make use of GeoIP information to point clients to the closest data center for accessing applications."

"The work balancing applications are the most valuable feature."

"Manageability and visibility are good."

"An essential component is the Director, which provides detailed insights into sessions, including identifying session failures, connection issues, user lockouts, etc. It presents a list of problems to address, enabling you to click on them and resolve them efficiently."

"Unified Gateway allows me to provide secure external access to applications for suppliers and customers while requiring Multi-Factor Authentication."

More NetScaler pros

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Provides good performance and scalability."

"The performance and stability are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."

"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance."

Cons

"The vendor provides frequent patches, however, the security of the website has room for improvement."

"I would like to enhance the solution's bot protection features."

"Currently, it is not easy to use the configuration capabilities of the product."

"I am not an expert in this solution, but simplicity and user-friendly interfaces are crucial for me. I would appreciate advice from Citrix, particularly in the form of an interactive guide for API protection. It would be helpful if they could provide specific points and recommendations for cybersecurity, indicating areas that need attention or improvement. I find such interactive guidance valuable."

"In every release - and it doesn't matter if it's a minor release or a major release - they keep moving things around and they keep changing the mechanism. So certain things can work in one version one way, and everything works really well, then when you upgrade it to the next version, it breaks everything because they have a new way of doing it."

"It can be difficult to setup."

"Integration with other third party providers and third party applications could be better because it can be a bit complex at present."

"There are certain features that are very useful and Citrix makes you pay a bit more for them."

More NetScaler cons

"Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market."

"Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."

"The solution lacks HA configuration."

"Could have more customizations on the dashboard."

"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Costly product and complicated licensing."

"The solution is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The solution is undoubtedly very good, but it is expensive."

"It all depends on the features that will be used and the number of accesses."

"The firewall license is included by default, with no additional costs."

"The client pays for the Citrix NetScaler license annually."

"Price-wise, I feel that the solution is a little bit expensive."

"It's an expensive product but it works well."

More NetScaler pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."

"Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix ADC?

The most valuable feature for us is the application firewalling in Citrix NetScaler, ensuring only valid traffic enters our environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix ADC?

After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Citrix ADC?

Citrix NetScaler is a robust product, but mastering it requires significant learning and training due to its complexity. While it could be easier to manage, it is like transitioning from driving a ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Radware LinkProof?

The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware LinkProof?

I would say Radware LinkProof falls into the mid-range pricing category. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Radware LinkProof?

I use Radware LinkProof to optimize our network by balancing multiple WAN links. It ensures uninterrupted access to applications by automatically redirecting traffic from failed or congested links.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScaler

Compared 14% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScaler

Compared 13% of the time

HAProxy vs NetScaler

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs NetScaler

Compared 10% of the time

VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs NetScaler

Compared 7% of the time

More NetScaler Competitors

Radware Alteon vs Radware LinkProof

Compared 64% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Radware LinkProof

Compared 36% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetScaler

December 2024

Download NetScaler product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

December 2024

Download Radware LinkProof product report

Also Known As

Citrix ADC, Citrix NetScaler VPX, NetScaler Console, NetScaler Web Application Firewall

LinkProof

Learn More

NetScaler

Radware

Overview

One platform for a consistent application delivery and security experience because nobody has time to learn multiple systems to manage ADC deployments. NetScaler is built with a single code base using a software-based architecture, so no matter which ADC form factor you choose — hardware, virtual machine, bare metal, or container — the behavior will be the same.

Radware LinkProof NG link load balancer cloud-based applications, is a multi-homing and enterprise gateway solution that offers service level availability and continuous connectivity of enterprise. It is an application-aware multi-homing and link load balancing module that delivers WAN optimization for 24/7 continuous connectivity and service level assurance for corporate and cloud-based applications. LinkProof NG scales from 100Mbps up to 160Gbps and can be deployed in entry-level to high-end data centers as well as enterprise branch offices.

Sample Customers

ABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk

Papa John's, OSRAM, ADP, NYLS

Buyer's Guide

NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof

January 2025

Free Report: NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof

Find out what your peers are saying about NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetScaler vs. Radware LinkProof report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.