Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nozomi Networks vs Sectrio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sectrio
Ranking in IoT Security
17th
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 31.8%, up from 28.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectrio is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Massimiliano La Camera - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides cost saving and offers device visibility
I think it's a stable solution and don't foresee any problems in the future. It's a leading security platform and is widely used in Italy. This gives them full visibility of all devices, which is often difficult to achieve. IT managers usually lack visibility into all products and security solutions. However, this platform lets customers gain visibility of their entire device environment. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.
reviewer2281179 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides multiple scans of all of the devices while offering visibility and status of the IoT devices
From the point of view of a reseller, Sectrio is better than other products in the sense that there is a lot of direct interaction my company has with Sectrio's teams instead of us having to communicate with the tool's team members via some impersonal portal on the internet. At the same time, not having an online portal is also a disadvantage because when you use a portal like Sophos and Sophos Central, where Sophos has a partner portal to register a user and get the pricing details, everything becomes a lot more streamlined. If you have to deal with people every time, then it gets a little cluttered. The aforementioned details revolve around the area of online portals, where the same thing can be considered a good point and a bad point.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."
"It has impacted security operations in a better way."
"The most valuable features of Nozomi Networks are the visibility of OT protocols and the versatility in finding the details of the assets feeding the tool."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."
"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
"It is an absolutely scalable solution."
 

Cons

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."
"I would like more customizable options for configurations."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"The solution should include an integration library."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."
"I want Sectrio's sales team to be a lot more aggressive than how they operate currently."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
"Sectrio is a product that is priced in the mid-range."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nozomi Networks?
The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, ...
What do you like most about Sectrio?
It is an absolutely scalable solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectrio?
Sectrio is a product that is priced in the mid-range. As there are very large-scale systems that are protected using Sectrio, I think that though the tool tends to be expensive, it does not make it...
What needs improvement with Sectrio?
I want Sectrio's sales team to be a lot more aggressive than how they operate currently.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

SCADAguardian
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis and others in IoT Security. Updated: March 2025.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.