Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nudetect vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Nudata and ThreatMetrix are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Nudata is ranked #23 with an average rating of 6.0, while ThreatMetrix is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Nudata holds a 0.5% mindshare in FDP, compared to ThreatMetrix’s 14.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ThreatMetrix users are willing to recommend the solution.

Read 1 Nudetect review

171 Views
82 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Read 8 ThreatMetrix reviews

2,683 Views
1,742 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nudetect and ThreatMetrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.

To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: October 2024).

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Nudetect

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

23rd

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

1

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThreatMetrix

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

8

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Nudetect is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatMetrix is 14.6%, up from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

reviewer2379738

Vice President at a newspaper with 201-500 employees

Used to identify frauds, but its accuracy could be improved

It is highly unlikely that I will recommend the solution to other users. Technologies have advanced over time, and there are better tools in the market. I'm not sure if Nudetect has been able to maintain its pace with other training tools. Nudetect is good for certain organizations, but it may not fit everyone. It depends upon the level of security and risk appetite organizations may have based on their responsibility to regulators. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Senior Director at CSS Corp

Enables to identify and analyze real-time incidents and mitigate risks

The setup is not complex. It is pretty standard. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten. The deployment time depends on the applications and environment into which we integrate it. The product provides a lot of API documentation. The product is cloud-based. One or two people are enough to deploy the solution. We need some maintenance when new versions or patches need to be upgraded. It requires minimal maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We integrate the solution with our Java on the UI and try to identify fraud."

"The most valuable thing is about the IP. They have a database of malicious IP addresses against which they check. They have a huge database for routed devices and the devices that have been used in the past to commit fraud. They have extensive historical records of all of that information, and that's probably the most valuable thing about ThreatMetrix. Over the years, they have been collecting and persisting globally across all the banking and financial services. They have been storing all this information. It is this stored information that I and my team find valuable; it is not so much their technology. If you are running it on a simulator and trying to maliciously clone and copy IP addresses and stuff like that, they have a bunch of technologies, like routes section and all the other stuff. It is just that they have something that no one else can deal with, that is, massive amounts of big data about the malicious IP addresses, malicious device fingerprinting, the fingerprinting router devices, and the fingerprints. You can query against this stored information to find out whether your app is in a good, nice environment. If yes, you get a green light. The last time I checked, there were about 400 or 500 features that they can stack against, which is pretty extensive. They give you a score against all those features for every application that you installed on it. It is pretty good in that sense."

"The solution can be easily integrated with applications."

"The user interface, the portal, is very helpful in describing what attributes of concern are associated with the device."

"There is excellent documentation available."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature the solution has is that it is able to do a fairly accurate fraud assessment of a credit card transaction based on a variety of parameters configured by the merchant."

"It is a stable solution."

"Accessible custom rules with a monthly update on performance."

Cons

"The tool is not very accurate, and its accuracy could be improved."

"One limitation is it only maintains six months' worth of data. It would be nice if it went back even further to help us really identify and flush out patterns that go on longer."

"We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful."

"It would be useful if they could offer real-time processing."

"SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking. If you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate. You have to understand and be an expert in low-level mobile applications to integrate this stuff. Integration should be easy based on what they are providing, but unfortunately, it is not. It is very difficult. My work has been trying to simplify the integration process because integrations bring a lot of value. Most companies don't see their value because it is such a difficult process. For integration, you have to get it right as well, but it is very difficult to get it right because they don't help you in tuning your future parameters. Because of this, it is very difficult to tune your future parameters and your risk score. If you are Uber, your risk score will be very different from a banking client that is pushing funds. These two things need to be improved for me. The rest is pretty good."

"The tool is very expensive."

"We encountered a few issues with API calls to the solution."

"The interface does look a bit outdated."

"Could be more intuitive and user friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."

report

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

48%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

5%

Retailer

5%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nudetect?

We integrate the solution with our Java on the UI and try to identify fraud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nudetect?

The tool is not very accurate, and its accuracy could be improved. I saw many false positives with the solution.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nudetect?

It is highly unlikely that I will recommend the solution to other users. Technologies have advanced over time, and there are better tools in the market. I'm not sure if Nudetect has been able to ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about ThreatMetrix?

It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatMetrix?

An average of 8000 hits a year costs $60,000.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatMetrix?

The tool is very expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

BioCatch vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 43% of the time

FICO Falcon Platform vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 12% of the time

Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Trusteer vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 6% of the time

iovation FraudForce vs ThreatMetrix

Compared 5% of the time

More ThreatMetrix Competitors

Product Reports

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Nudetect report

Download Nudetect product report

ThreatMetrix report

Download ThreatMetrix product report

Also Known As

Nudata Nudetect

No data available

Learn More

Overview

Recognize your known user
Build a strong relationship with your good customer with NuDetect.
With our +99% accuracy, you avoid false declines and unnecessary friction. Treat your good customers with the trust they deserve.

Cut down account takeover
Block high-risk traffic in real time and stop future fraud.
Continuously protect your customers and your business from account takeover with no friction on your good users, even if legitimate stolen credentials are presented.

Protect beyond the login
Uncover all the fraud that hides in your environment. Bad actors are getting creative by attacking where nobody is watching – or so they think. NuDetect monitors all the activity in a session – not just at the login stage – for more in-depth visibility.

Reduce friction, reduce risk
Increase your users’ loyalty with less friction. NuDetect creates a user risk score to help you find out who your good customers are. Use this score to safely waive friction and fast-track your validated users. Leave friction for high-risk traffic only.

Deconstructing fake identities
Fraudsters buy breached data to create fake accounts and use them for future fraud. Our Trust Consortium gathers billions of data points to identify those new fake accounts. NuDetect flags these accounts for you so you can close them and avoid future fraud.

Scale limitlessly on the cloud
Deploy anywhere with the support of AWS, Azure, GCP, or even your own data center. Reduce risk with enterprise-grade security controls. Enjoy the costs savings of on-demand computing.

ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.

Sample Customers

Clydesdale Bank (incorporating Yorkshire Bank), Danske Bank, Metro Bank, Monzo Bank, Starling Bank.

Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: October 2024.

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.