OneStream XF vs Oracle HFM comparison

"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."

"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."

"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."

"It is a very user-friendly software."

"The most valuable features are around consolidations, eliminations, conversions."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"You can bring in data from any source and from multiple sources, and you can consolidate that data in HFM."

"Financial consolidation and reporting tool with good built-in features such as currency exchange and elimination."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation."

"The tool is stable."

"It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a better return on investment based on usage."

"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."

"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."

"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."

"If there could be data integration between HFM and the accounting software that would be ideal."

"The solution has integration challenges. We need a simple tool that is fool-proof for the data that is submitted not only for consolidation purposes but also for performance management and reporting purposes."

"Integration is an area where it lacks and can be improved."

"Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities."

"It's a difficult process to try to edit, configure, or change the business rules that exist and work within HFM."

"In terms of improvement, one challenge with Oracle HFM is the need for technical knowledge in writing SQL syntax for custom extensions."

"The intercompany reporting function in this tool needs improvement, particularly being able to run reports in batches, rather than one at a time."

"The complexity is okay. I don't see it as super complex. The solution could have more functionality to make it a little bit more flexible."

"They price it by the user. Before discounting, it is 2,500 or something like that."

"The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (HFM) uses the named user licensing model. There's different pricing depending on HFM and Essbase planning."