Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle HFM vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.6
Oracle Cloud enhances ROI by saving costs, improving accuracy, accelerating processes, and boosting decision-making in financial operations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Oracle HFM support is knowledgeable but sometimes slow; users rely on partner networks and external resources for help.
Sentiment score
5.3
Oracle's support varies; domestic service is praised, overseas sees delays, but escalation often improves user satisfaction.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Oracle HFM supports large organizations effectively, offering scalability and stability, though some prefer SuccessFactors for better scalability options.
Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud excels in scalability, integration, and adaptability, outperforming competitors like OneStream in organizational growth.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle HFM is stable, reliable, user-friendly, but occasionally performance issues arise despite consistent high stability ratings.
Sentiment score
7.4
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is stable and effective, with minor setup issues but improved reliability over previous solutions.
 

Room For Improvement

Oracle HFM needs modern updates in usability, integration, and functionality, including improved reporting, automation, and a unified system.
Oracle Planning Cloud requires improved performance, integration, and customization for enhanced user experience and functionality.
 

Setup Cost

Oracle HFM's user-based licensing is costly but ensures compliance, reduces risks, and offers a good return on investment.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud costs about $40,000 yearly, with pricing factors including size, users, and data volume.
 

Valuable Features

Oracle HFM excels in data consolidation, multi-currency handling, and financial reporting, offering flexibility and user-friendly access.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud delivers advanced budgeting, customization, and integration features, enhancing flexibility and performance over competitors.
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle HFM
Ranking in Business Performance Management
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Planning and Budgeti...
Ranking in Business Performance Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Oracle HFM is 9.8%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is 6.3%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedHaridy - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers flexibility and ease of configuration
The initial setup of Oracle HFM is generally straightforward and not overly complex. The deployment time for Oracle HFM varies with the resources, but it usually takes around three to eight months, with an average of three to four months. The deployment process for Oracle HFM involves several key steps. It begins with the installation of Oracle software, followed by gathering requirements and relevant documents. These documents help define the report formats and service needs. Next, the team configures the system, starting with the enterprise structure, which needs to align with the ERP system. Data loading and configuration follow, with Oracle HFM typically requiring more resources compared to other systems like SuccessFactors.
Prithwish Kumar Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Budgeting scenarios and versions helps us migrate data, visualize data, and do variant reporting
The best thing about the tool is the budgeting scenarios and versions. It helps us migrate data, visualize data, and do variant reporting. There are approval processes that allow users to submit data, whether for budgeting or forecasting. When they submit, it goes up in the hierarchy for approval. If the data looks good to the manager, they can approve it. This is a very unique feature that we get. The approval process is a back-and-forth process; it doesn't get finalized in one go. Another feature is the business rules, where we can give users the flexibility to run calculations on demand. We can set runtime prompts for them, so they can run the calculation for whichever year or factors they want. They just need to know the value they want. Everything else can be set up by the admins. These are the flexibilities that we can give the user.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle HFM?
The most valuable feature is the flexibility and ease of configuration in terms of testing and formula creation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle HFM?
It depends on the discount offered by Oracle. It is an expensive product but delivers what it promises, ensuring regulatory compliance, reducing risks associated with spreadsheets, and providing a ...
What needs improvement with Oracle HFM?
Improvements can be made by possibly different interfaces to modernize it, more automation in scripting, and better integration with third-party solutions and reporting capabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
While cloud pricing may initially appear more expensive due to the absence of infrastructure expenses, it is fair. There's no need for physical servers or infrastructure management. The licensing i...
What needs improvement with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
Oracle made a mistake by forcing HFM users to transition to FCCS before the solution was mature enough. It caused many clients to opt for OneStream due to its similarity with HFM. FCCS initially la...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
I have implemented Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud in many industries, such as manufacturing, banks, construction, and health business. It's an amazing software. In the past, Oracle was the mai...
 

Also Known As

HFM
Oracle PBCS, Oracle Enterprise Business Planning
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

B&B Hotels, Goldwind, Drake & Scull
Australian Finance Group Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., TBS Group, Delaware Life Insurance, Shelf Drilling Ltd., Abu Dhabi Department of Finance, Fugro Norway AS, Drake & Scull International PJSC (DSI), Racepoint Global, Edgewater Technology Inc., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Communications Test Design Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle HFM vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.