Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OneStream XF vs SAP Business Planning and Consolidation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OneStream XF
Ranking in Financial Close Software
6th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (9th)
SAP Business Planning and C...
Ranking in Financial Close Software
8th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Financial Close Software category, the mindshare of OneStream XF is 3.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Business Planning and Consolidation is 7.9%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Financial Close Software
 

Featured Reviews

AndyJorgensen - PeerSpot reviewer
Combines consolidations, planning, and forecasting into a single platform, eliminating the need for multiple products and streamlining data management
There's always stuff on the drawing board, and there's an arms race going on in the AI space. It's too soon to pick a winner between OneStream and Oracle. OneStream's smaller, so maybe they're more nimble, but Oracle has more resources. AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet. The other thing is that there are probably little things in the UI and overall processes that could be made easier to use. But there's nothing so consequential that it ruins your experience. It's more about tweaking and streamlining certain processes within the system.
it_user90087 - PeerSpot reviewer
​​It's a robust solution with no issues​. In my view, it is necessary to introduce another way to create reports apart from MS Excel.
There are no tutorials or wizards inside the tool, and I think they would be very useful sometimes. Having said that, I suspect that it is one of the SAP's strategies, because they get a lot of money from SAP training and don't want people learning who to work with their products on their own. There is another thing as well which could be improved. In my view, it is necessary to introduce another way to create reports apart from MS Excel, and it must be a way that can be exploited through mobile devices as well.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Financial Close Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Seeking lightweight open source BI software
I advise you to try OneStream. This is a very good platform focused on reporting, consolidation and budgeting & forecasting.
What do you like most about OneStream XF?
It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OneStream XF?
The product has a license by the user. They're on par with other competitors. One thing to consider is their relationship with Microsoft. They often push customers towards Azure, and Azure can get ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP BPC
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Fruit of the loom, Melrose, AAA, Valeo Foods
Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Blackline, Workiva, Infor and others in Financial Close Software. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.