OpenLegacy vs webMethods.io comparison

OpenLegacy and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. OpenLegacy is ranked #36, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenLegacy holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenLegacy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

OpenLegacy

Read 5 OpenLegacy reviews

438 Views
438 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
2,484 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenLegacy

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenLegacy and webMethods.io are enterprise-focused integration solutions, with webMethods.io often seen as having superior technological capabilities, offering advanced features that many organizations find beneficial despite its potentially higher cost.

Features: OpenLegacy enables effective modernization with rapid API development, seamless integration with mainframes, and a user-friendly API development environment. webMethods.io offers comprehensive integration features, cloud-based capabilities, and extensive connector support, making it versatile for various integration needs.

Room for Improvement: OpenLegacy could enhance its cloud integration capabilities, improve scalability in complex enterprise environments, and expand its connector library. webMethods.io could streamline its deployment process, reduce complexity in its user interface, and refine its pricing model for better competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenLegacy offers a straightforward deployment process, especially suited for legacy systems, supported by dedicated customer assistance. webMethods.io provides a flexible hybrid deployment model, combining cloud and on-premise options, alongside robust global customer support, offering high versatility across environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenLegacy generally provides lower setup costs with quick ROI for organizations focusing on legacy integration. webMethods.io might involve higher initial costs but delivers ROI through its extensive feature set and adaptability, appealing to enterprises with broader integration demands.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenLegacy

Ranking in API Management

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of OpenLegacy is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.6%
OpenLegacy	0.5%
Other	96.9%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1042905

VP, Chief Enterprise Integration Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The biggest advantage is how simple the technology was.

I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be. OpenLegacy handles the bread-and-butter TP monitoring stuff, but I am working for one of the six banks in the United States still using the Hogan mainframe, which has a slightly proprietary mechanism. But OpenLegacy currently doesn't have a connector for Hogan. So it would help if they could build one. That would appeal to financial institutions that still use Hogan, like US Bank, Wells Fargo, KeyBank, and Vanguard.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

An integration platform that enables you to automate tasks by connecting apps and services

Follow best practices,engage in their professional services to help build your messaging system and to be PR have some PR emphasis and and blue Bluegreen deployment You could take half your your clusters out, upgrade them, and put them back in so you have a quick callback. And also patch quarterly, we got we got downbound. And and at that point, it's a little hard to get into the cycle when you're releasing software every every week, and you're trying to, go through an upgrade seven fifty servers, it's a little hard to get into the upgrade flow when when you're running that tight. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using mainframe programs (not screens), the OpenLegacy services do not require any changes by the mainframe programmers, thus reducing development cycles."

"OpenLegacy produces a war file which includes everything you need to deploy a Tomcat server."

"Opens the door to connect modern web products to an old legacy system."

"Using OpenLegacy, the exposure of services is far easier and quicker. In many cases, exposure of services requires just a few clicks and takes only minutes. In very complex cases, it still only takes half a day. Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services."

"It is possible to solve larger legacy API issues on an enterprise level with this product."

"The biggest advantage of OpenLegacy was how simple the technology was. We were able to build out the OpenLegacy parts very quickly. We put together a couple hundred APIs in six months."

"It is possible to connect a service to a mainframe program or back transaction in a matter of minutes or hours at the most."

"OpenLegacy provides a way to go from the outside world to the legacy mainframe, to move the old standard application to a REST API application. New digital services can be created in a few clicks and this can be done easily by COBOL programmers."

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."

"Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."

"The solution is scalable."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."

"I like the solution's policies, transformation, mediation, and routing features."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"I would like to see SSL out-of-the-box. OpenLegacy certainly does SSL, but it was not the default for our use case. We are currently working with OpenLegacy to cross the SSL bridge and suspect that most users will want to do the same."

"We would also be more than happy if the product had the option to work in the opposite direction – the ability to consume REST/SOW services in the outer world from the mainframe."

"Customer support for the product is slow and not very good. It makes using the product difficult if you need help quickly."

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"Debugging and logging for programmers could be better."

"I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."

"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."

"Some things could be improved, especially how ActiveTransfer handles third-party file transfers. It would be nice to have a native file-watching mechanism for when you're scheduling jobs with a third-party scheduler. Currently, we are using an outside file watcher solution to check the files before the file transfer. It checks the location to see if the file is there. If the file is there, it will prepare it for transfer. If the file isn't available, it will send an email it can create a ticket send it now. We recommended adding this file watcher mechanism."

"It could be more user-friendly."

"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"The price is high and I give it a five out of ten."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under."

"It is worth the cost."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs OpenLegacy

Compared 25% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs OpenLegacy

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs OpenLegacy

Compared 22% of the time

IBM API Connect vs OpenLegacy

Compared 16% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenLegacy

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenLegacy Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy

October 2025

Download OpenLegacy product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

October 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

OpenLegacy helps organizations quickly launch innovative digital services by extending their core back-end systems to the web, mobile and cloud in days or weeks versus months. Our microservice-enabled API integration and management software quickly reduces project backlog by automating and accelerating microservices and API creation, deployment, testing and management from core applications, mainframes and databases. Together, business and IT teams can quickly, easily and securely meet consumer, partner or employee demands for digital services without modernizing or replacing core systems, and without special programming skills or invasive changes to existing systems and architectures. OpenLegacy is designed for ongoing management of microservices APIs and is based on open standards, so our software plays nice with your current technology stack and supports agile, DevOps and continuous development. Learn why leading companies choose OpenLegacy at www.openlegacy.com.

OpenLegacy

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Many of openLegacy's global customers are among the Global 100 companies. Review case studies in these industries: Agriculture, Airport Authority, Automotive, Auto, Finance, Insurance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retailwww.openlegacy.com/case-studie...

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.