We performed a comparison between OpenShift and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the high availability for the applications."
"Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."
"The virtualization of my APIs means I no longer have to pay VMware large amounts of money to only run in-house solutions."
"Self-provisioning support saves a lot of time and unnecessary work from the system administrator who can use this time to run and monitor the infrastructure. For the developer, this means less time waiting for the provisioning and excellent flexibility for development, testing, and production. Also, in such systems it is easy for developers to monitor applications even after deployment."
"The product's initial setup is very easy, especially compared to AWS."
"The developers seem to like the source-to-image feature. That makes it easy for them to deploy an application from code into containers, so they don't have to think about things. They take it straight from their code into a containerized application. If you don't have OpenShift, you have to build the container and then deploy the container to, say, EKS or something like that."
"OpenShift offers more stability than Kubernetes."
"Overall, the solution's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is excellent."
"The product is scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring."
"The product is easy to use and deploy."
"It is more secure and more controlled than an on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Cloud is its autonomous database."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Cloud are the ease of navigation and stability. The solution is more feature-rich and powerful than these smaller alternatives."
"Oracle Cloud is reasonably scalable - I'd rate it seven out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Interface."
"Latency and performance are two areas of concern in OpenShift where improvements are required."
"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."
"The whole area around the hybrid cloud could be improved. I would like to deploy a Red Hat OpenShift cluster on-premise and on the cloud, then have Red Hat do the entire hybrid cloud management."
"OpenShift could improve by providing the ability to integrate with public cloud platforms. This way we can easily use the services that these platforms offer. For instance, Amazon AWS. However, all the three major hyper-scalers solutions offer excellent DevOps and CI/CD tooling. If there was an easy way to integrate with them it would be beneficial. We need a way to easily integrate with the monitoring and dashboard services that they provide."
"It would be great if it supported Bitbucket repositories too."
"This solution could be improved by offering best practices on standardization and additional guidance on how to use this solution."
"The latest 4.0 version of OpenShift disabled a few of the features we previously made use of, although this wasn't a huge deal."
"Its virtual upgrades are time-consuming."
"They could add more features."
"The solution requires tighter integration capabilities."
"Simplifying the cloud management console would be really valuable for small and large customers alike."
"The customization and the requests put through were not flexible enough."
"I would like the Oracle Cloud Platform to have a more user-friendly UI similar to Microsoft Azure."
"The product features related to the manufacturing domain must be improved."
"More technical papers could be published to help out professionals."
"It isn't easy to get qualified people who know how to work on this tool. All my administrators are learning as they go. Since this is the only cloud solution provider in Saudi Arabia, and it has only been around for one year, I am sure that this will change with time."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenShift is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 53 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews. OpenShift is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift writes "Provides us with the flexibility and efficiency of cloud-native stacks while enabling us to meet regulatory constraints". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". OpenShift is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and VMware Tanzu Application Service, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. See our OpenShift vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.