Selenium HQ and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are two prominent tools in automation testing. Selenium HQ seems to have the upper hand due to its open-source nature, flexibility, and extensive community support, making it a cost-effective choice for many organizations.
Features: Selenium HQ offers flexibility and extensive browser support, allowing use across multiple programming languages with a strong community backing. It provides parallel test execution and is cost-effective, due to being open-source. OpenText delivers extensive integration capabilities, broad technology support, and robust out-of-the-box solutions, ideal for those less inclined to build custom frameworks.
Room for Improvement: Selenium HQ could enhance its reporting capabilities, support for mobile devices, and handling of Ajax calls. The reliance on community support can pose challenges for immediate assistance. OpenText, often critiqued for its high cost, could benefit from offering more competitive pricing options compared to open-source counterparts like Selenium.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Selenium HQ can be deployed on various platforms, including cloud-based options, but lacks direct customer support, relying instead on community forums. OpenText offers traditional customer service, advantageous for organizations emphasizing customer support as part of their technical needs.
Pricing and ROI: Selenium HQ is highly cost-effective, being open-source and free from licensing costs, enhancing ROI by reducing manual testing resources. It suits organizations with technical expertise to develop frameworks. In contrast, OpenText incurs a higher total cost of ownership due to licensing fees but offers comprehensive features and support, potentially lowering operational costs in extensive testing environments.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
The marketplace community and forums are what we browse and look after, and we have found solutions whenever we tried to find anything.
I have not had the need to escalate questions to Selenium HQ tech support recently, as open community support is widely available and has been sufficient for our needs.
We can execute thousands of test cases weekly, and our automation coverage using Selenium HQ is approximately eighty-five percent.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
Selenium HQ is a scalable solution; it has been in production for the last two years, but I have been working on it for the last six years, so it is definitely scalable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
An automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.
I don't know if we have that capability to provide different data sources such as SQL Server, CSV, or maybe some other databases, so that kind of capability would be great.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
Selenium HQ supports multiple browsers via grid hosting and offers dynamic configuration setup for testing across Chrome, Edge, and Internet Explorer.
When we were doing these tests manually, it took several hours of effort, and those hours, when counted on the basis of person days, used to be maybe six or seven months of effort, which we can now do every day by running the pipeline.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Selenium HQ | 4.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.3% |
| Other | 92.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Selenium HQ, an open-source testing framework, is recognized for its ability to automate web testing across diverse environments. Its versatility in script customization and cross-browser support makes it a trusted tool for efficient automation testing.
Selenium HQ offers significant support for multiple browsers and programming languages, providing integration with CI tools and compatibility with frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users leverage its open-source nature for cost-effective testing and appreciate its scalability and flexibility for parallel execution. A vibrant community contributes to its continuous development. However, improvements are desired in performance-testing, parallel execution efficiency, and enhanced mobile device support. Users find it complex for those without development skills, with needs for better iOS automation and expanded reporting features.
What are the key features of Selenium HQ?Selenium HQ is widely adopted across industries for its comprehensive automation capabilities. Enterprises often employ it for UI and regression testing in web and mobile applications, integrating seamlessly with CI tools for a streamlined workflow. Its ability to automate API calls further enhances its utility across industry sectors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
