Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 10.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 94 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 8,754 Views
  • 5,469 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
UiPath Test Suite
Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews
  • 2,351 Views
  • 1,426 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and UiPath Test Suite compete in the software testing tools category. UiPath Test Suite appears to have the upper hand due to its intuitive low-code environment and efficient reporting capabilities.

Features: OpenText UFT One supports a wide array of applications and environments, featuring integration capabilities with Oracle and SAP. It utilizes AI enhancements to optimize cross-platform automation and is known for its GUI testing and API capabilities. UiPath Test Suite excels in process automation with a low-code user interface, efficient data gathering, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with various lifecycle tools, enhancing its versatility across technologies.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One is noted for its high cost, slow execution, and high resource consumption. Users report challenges with test script complexity and stability. UiPath Test Suite needs better test case management, a more intuitive interface, and enhanced reporting. Both products face criticism regarding pricing, with UiPath needing improved competitive pricing and integration enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One integrates well in on-premises settings but faces criticism for complex support navigation. UiPath Test Suite offers flexible deployment options on-premises and in the cloud, with generally responsive customer support, though there is room for improvement in support channels.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is costly but offers a high ROI through its broad system support. UiPath Test Suite, while less expensive than traditional options, still faces pricing critiques but is commended for its high ROI due to flexible and robust testing features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Organizations using OpenText UFT One experience up to 300% ROI through enhanced efficiency and 60% test automation.
Sentiment score
8.1
Organizations benefit from UiPath Test Suite with reduced costs, resource needs, and development time, showcasing swift, varied value.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
OpenText UFT One's customer service is praised for expertise but faces challenges with response speed and technician knowledge variability.
No sentiment score available
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
OpenText UFT One is highly scalable, adaptable for varying team sizes, with some execution speed challenges in large test suites.
Sentiment score
7.1
UiPath Test Suite excels in scalability and automation, but faces challenges with Excel, SharePoint, and communication improvements needed.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Opinions on OpenText UFT One's stability vary, with some users experiencing stability issues influenced by system specifications and configurations.
Sentiment score
7.8
UiPath Test Suite is stable, occasionally facing connectivity issues, but users find it reliable and effective for business automation.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One needs improvements in compatibility, performance, technology support, integration, cost, and usability for enhanced user experience.
UiPath Test Suite needs enhancements in mobile automation, Jira integration, usability, efficiency, and pricing to address user challenges.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One is costly but valued for reducing manual testing and enhancing automation efficiency, sometimes offering discounts.
UiPath Test Suite offers various licenses, extensive features, and customization, but users prefer flexible pricing over the upfront model.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One is versatile, supporting multiple platforms with AI capabilities and robust integration for comprehensive test automation.
UiPath Test Suite excels in integration, ease of automation, and cost-effective productivity through its low-code, user-friendly platform.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Suite report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th)
UiPath Test Suite
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.4%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.4%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Deepak Digar. - PeerSpot reviewer
Increases productivity compared to other tools
The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
The user interface could be improved.
See all answers
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
More precise logging would be appreciated. Additionally, addressing some bugs could improve functionality, and pricing could be more competitive.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 10% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 6% of the time
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Ranorex Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite
Compared 40% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite
Compared 10% of the time
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite Logo
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite
Compared 9% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite Logo
Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite
Compared 6% of the time
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite Logo
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite
Compared 5% of the time
More UiPath Test Suite Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
November 2024
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Test Suite
November 2024
UiPath Test Suite reportDownload UiPath Test Suite product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
No data available
 

Learn More

OpenText
Video not available
UiPath
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite
October 2024
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.