Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Coherence vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Coherence
Ranking in Database Development and Management
20th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
In-Memory Data Store Services (9th)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Ranking in Database Development and Management
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (9th), Data Warehouse (7th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)
 

Featured Reviews

ShanmugaSundaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical support is okay, but it has issues with stability and performance
We have our own data center with a lot of servers running on the Linux platform This platform has issues with stability and performance. I have been using Oracle Coherence for only a couple of years. In total, I have about 30 years of experience in the Oracle environment. I began with Oracle…
Derrick Brockel - PeerSpot reviewer
The product improves site reliability, but it is not stable, and the initial deployment was a little difficult
When we had outages, we had timeouts. Sometimes, the nodes would drop out of a cluster. Therefore, the applications would get timeouts. There is a newer version out that we're planning to upgrade to for some stability. It could also be caused by our design. The product must improve its reliability. It'd be nice if nodes could drop out and notify each other in a timely manner so that the applications wouldn't know if there was a problem.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Technical support from Oracle is okay."
"Coherence is beneficial due to its multi-indexing to the same object and filtering based on data attributes within the object, followed by aggregation."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"Pivotal Greenplum's shared-nothing architecture."
"Tanzu Greenplum's most valuable features include the integration of modern data science approaches across an MPP platform."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
 

Cons

"This platform has issues with stability and performance."
"The initial setup is complex and time-consuming."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"Implementation takes a long time."
"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."
"VMware Tanzu Greenplum needs improvement in the memory area and improved methods for quick access to the disc. So, one of the quick goals of Greenplum must work on enhancing access to the disc by adding hints in the database."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price is pretty good."
"It is an open-source product."
"The pricing is okay."
"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."
"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
45%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Construction Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?
It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.
 

Also Known As

Coherence
Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Industrial Bank of Korea, Hotelbeds, Canon Inc., Verizon, Securitas Direct Espa_a, S.A.U., CetelemEspa_aGrupo BNP Paribas, Telus
General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.