Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System vs Oracle ZFS comparison

The compared Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System and Oracle ZFS solutions aren't in the same category. Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked #12 in ES , and holds a 1.2% mindshare in the category. Oracle ZFS is ranked #3 in FSS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 13.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle ZFS users who would recommend it.

Oracle FS1 Flash Storage Sy...

Read 1 Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System review

30 Views
25 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Oracle ZFS

Read 5 Oracle ZFS reviews

949 Views
685 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle FS1 Flash Storage Sy...

Oracle ZFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System and Oracle ZFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Enterprise SAN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise SAN Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise SAN

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Oracle FS1 Flash Storage Sy...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise SAN (12th), All-Flash Storage (36th)

Oracle ZFS

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System and Oracle ZFS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is designed for Enterprise SAN and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Oracle ZFS, on the other hand, focuses on File System Software, holds 13.8% mindshare, down 14.2% since last year.

Enterprise SAN

File System Software

Q&A Highlights

it_user805614

Senior Manager with 1-10 employees

Jan 29, 2020

Differences Between Oracle ZFS5-2 and Oracle FS1-2

This question may be moot now. Oracle EOL'd FS1 and RIF'd most of the FS1 staff a while ago. While both ZFS (now ZFS7) and FS1 are/were unified storage systems, ZFS is primarily NAS; FS1 was primarily SAN with some QoS and multi-tenancy features and such.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

reviewer1221969

Technical Head with 51-200 employees

Jan 29, 2020

Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions

I would suggest, if you heavily depend on the Oracle solution from the database you should consider Oracle All-Flash because, from my understanding, it is from a single OEM, it's a single solution. It would be a homogeneous environment. I think it would be definitely a better option for customers considering other all-flash storages. It would be better if you consider a solution from Oracle, from the database studio, the storage part. I would rate it an eight out of ten. To make it a perfect ten, in the next release, I would like for it to be NVMe compliant storage.

Read full review

Rajesh Sudini

Associate Director at Optum

Apr 25, 2022

Enterprise storage system that offers consistent stability and data security

The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved. We have been using this solution for three and a half years. This is a…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's actually shaking hands with the workflow solutions much better than any other storage."

"The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features."

"It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else."

"Oracle ZFS is very fast and it is efficient. It has outperformed any hardware array controller that I've ever come across. With Oracle ZFS on my NAS, which is running five, four terabyte drives, when I've had a drive failure and changed one out, it'll rebuild that array in two hours, or maybe less. When you think you're rebuilding almost four terabytes of data redundancy, that's pretty good using an old AMD Turion hardware, that's nothing to complain about."

Cons

"It has to be flexible according to the customer's requirements. It has to be aligned with the customer business and the business environment."

"Oracle ZFS does what I've asked it to do, and it has done it very efficiently. The only time I'm running into issues is with Proxmox. If I run ZFS drives, I find my RAM usage is very high. However, I don't have that problem with the TrueNAS system, where I'm running an old N36 Turion with four gigabytes of RAM, and that's running 24/7. There have been no issues with such a low-powered environment there, it works fine, but with Proxmox it seems to go slow."

"ZFS is great for just mass storage, but if you're trying to make fast storage – something like a SAN-type delivery network where you wanted to do any type of RAM disc over the network – it falls flat. ZFS does not do that. It is kind of limiting."

"When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise SAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle ZFS?

It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle ZFS?

The question is, can it do a lot better? So for example, it could run an airline, and all the computer systems, but can it do it as effectively and efficiently as it could on other systems? No. Tha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle ZFS?

My company is a team of developers and system integrators and we build cloud services for companies so they can pull stuff back from Google and Microsoft in-house to make it more efficient and use ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

WekaFS vs Oracle ZFS

Compared 80% of the time

Cohesity SpanFS vs Oracle ZFS

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Oracle ZFS

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle ZFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise SAN

November 2024

Download Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System product report

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

November 2024

Download Oracle ZFS product report

Also Known As

No data available

ZFS

Learn More

Oracle

Overview

The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, Oracle’s premier preferred SAN storage solution, delivers enterprise-grade storage capabilities that are optimized for flash media and coengineered with Oracle software. Using the Quality of Service Plus (QoS Plus) feature, the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system places data across flash and disk storage to maximize performance, efficiency, and cost based on usage profiles and business priorities. The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system takes application-engineered storage to a new level by providing out-of-the-box tuned storage provisioning profiles for Oracle Database and key applications, including Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, and VMware support including VAAI. With the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, you can consolidate storage while achieving predictable performance for multiple diverse workloads in enterprise computing or multitenant environments.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance delivers leading performance and superior efficiency in enterprise-class network-attached storage (NAS) environments, accelerating business functions, and reducing complexity. This first application-engineered storage system provides unique integration points with Oracle Database which automate storage tuning and data lifecycle management, reduce capacity requirements, and lower TCO.

Sample Customers

Enterprise Strategy Group, Groupe AGRICA, Keolis, Dragon Slayer Consultant

Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., Hospital AlemÊo Oswaldo Cruz, DB Schenker Rail, Asia Commercial Bank, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, Ricoh Company Ltd., CyberSolutions Inc., NARA INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, SunGard Availability Services, B&H PhotoVideo,

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Enterprise SAN. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.