Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cohesity SpanFS vs Oracle ZFS comparison

Cohesity and Oracle are both solutions in the File System Software category. Cohesity is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Cohesity holds a 3.9% mindshare in FSS, compared to Oracle’s 13.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution.
Cohesity SpanFS
Read 2 Cohesity SpanFS reviews
  • 380 Views
  • 242 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Oracle ZFS
Read 5 Oracle ZFS reviews
  • 949 Views
  • 685 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Oracle ZFS and Cohesity SpanFS are two competing storage solutions, each with its strengths and areas for improvement. Based on user reviews, Oracle ZFS is favored for its robust performance and advanced integration capabilities, while Cohesity SpanFS stands out for its simplicity and scalability.

Features: Oracle ZFS offers high-performance storage, advanced integration with Oracle's ecosystem, and robust performance, making it ideal for Oracle-heavy environments. Cohesity SpanFS provides ease of managing data across different environments, seamless cloud integration, and versatility for a broader range of applications.

Room for Improvement: Oracle ZFS needs a more intuitive management system, improved updates for compatibility with non-Oracle systems, and refinement in user interface. Cohesity SpanFS requires enhancements in real-time analytics, faster interface speed, and advanced data management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle ZFS has a challenging setup process but offers excellent post-deployment support through Oracle's customer service. Cohesity SpanFS is known for straightforward, faster deployment and a responsive support team, making it more user-friendly in terms of initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle ZFS has high setup costs that are offset by its performance and integration benefits, resulting in a high ROI. Cohesity SpanFS is cost-effective with a strong ROI, justified by its flexibility and minimal maintenance requirements, making it a preferred option for budget-conscious buyers.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity SpanFS
Ranking in File System Software
7th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle ZFS
Ranking in File System Software
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File System Software category, the mindshare of Cohesity SpanFS is 3.9%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle ZFS is 13.8%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File System Software
 

Featured Reviews

SM
Along with offering competitive prices, the solution can be used by small, medium, and large businesses
While guaranteeing the strictness of the file system, there is a lot of performance involved. The performance is not as good as I expected. It's not the functionality here but the performance level. It won't be a problem if it's twice as fast. Even though its stability has room for improvement, I would recommend it to my bigger customers. The only problem is the current performance of the individual nodes. As a sale-out solution with integrated load-balancing functions, performance is in principle not a problem at all. Capacity and performance are linearly scalable over the number of nodes in the cluster. An increase in the performance of the individual nodes in future releases would be desirable.
Read full review
Rajesh Sudini - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise storage system that offers consistent stability and data security
The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved.  We have been using this solution for three and a half years. This is a…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It has snapshot capabilities. We take advantage of those."
"It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else."
"The replication capability and data security have been the most valuable features."
"Oracle ZFS is very fast and it is efficient. It has outperformed any hardware array controller that I've ever come across. With Oracle ZFS on my NAS, which is running five, four terabyte drives, when I've had a drive failure and changed one out, it'll rebuild that array in two hours, or maybe less. When you think you're rebuilding almost four terabytes of data redundancy, that's pretty good using an old AMD Turion hardware, that's nothing to complain about."
 

Cons

"The only problem is the current performance of the individual nodes. As a sale-out solution with integrated load-balancing functions, performance is in principle not a problem at all. Capacity and performance are linearly scalable over the number of nodes in the cluster. An increase in the performance of the individual nodes in future releases would be desirable."
"Its read performance can be improved. It is just slow in comparison to other file systems, but a lot of it also has to do with the fact that they have a limited number of spindles under each node."
"ZFS is great for just mass storage, but if you're trying to make fast storage – something like a SAN-type delivery network where you wanted to do any type of RAM disc over the network – it falls flat. ZFS does not do that. It is kind of limiting."
"When retrieving data from the replication of remote sites, it does not give you immediate results. The RPO and RTO rates could be improved."
"Oracle ZFS does what I've asked it to do, and it has done it very efficiently. The only time I'm running into issues is with Proxmox. If I run ZFS drives, I find my RAM usage is very high. However, I don't have that problem with the TrueNAS system, where I'm running an old N36 Turion with four gigabytes of RAM, and that's running 24/7. There have been no issues with such a low-powered environment there, it works fine, but with Proxmox it seems to go slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to pricing, I know the prices because I am also running tenders for customers where I am not offering other solutions. Hence, the prices are pretty competitive."
"I won't talk about specific numbers, but it is a little hard to compare it to other products out there because there is nobody out there that does exactly what they do. If you are just comparing it to another NAS box, it is probably going to look higher, but that's an unfair comparison because it does things that a NAS box can't do."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
12%
University
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cohesity SpanFS?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity SpanFS?
When it comes to pricing, I know the prices because I am also running tenders for customers where I am not offering other solutions. Hence, the prices are pretty competitive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cohesity SpanFS?
While guaranteeing the strictness of the file system, there is a lot of performance involved. The performance is not as good as I expected. It's not the functionality here but the performance level...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle ZFS?
It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle ZFS?
The question is, can it do a lot better? So for example, it could run an airline, and all the computer systems, but can it do it as effectively and efficiently as it could on other systems? No. Tha...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Oracle ZFS?
My company is a team of developers and system integrators and we build cloud services for companies so they can pull stuff back from Google and Microsoft in-house to make it more efficient and use ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

WekaFS vs Cohesity SpanFS Logo
WekaFS vs Cohesity SpanFS
Compared 37% of the time
More Cohesity SpanFS Competitors
WekaFS vs Oracle ZFS Logo
WekaFS vs Oracle ZFS
Compared 80% of the time
Amazon FSx vs Oracle ZFS Logo
Amazon FSx vs Oracle ZFS
Compared 6% of the time
More Oracle ZFS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
File System Software
November 2024
Cohesity SpanFS reportDownload Cohesity SpanFS product report
Buyer's Guide
File System Software
November 2024
Oracle ZFS reportDownload Oracle ZFS product report
 

Also Known As

SpanFS
ZFS
 

Learn More

Cohesity
Oracle
 

Overview

Designed to combine the best of enterprise and cloud stacks, SpanFS exposes industry-standard, globally distributed NFS, SMB and S3 interfaces.

The IO Engine detects random vs. sequential IO profiles, splits the data into chunks, performs deduplication and directs to the most appropriate storage tier.

SpanFS also includes a new Metadata Store based on a consistent, distributed, NoSQL store for fast operations at scale.

SnapTree® provides a distributed meta data structure based on B+ tree concepts. It supports unlimited, frequent snapshots with no performance degradation.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance delivers leading performance and superior efficiency in enterprise-class network-attached storage (NAS) environments, accelerating business functions, and reducing complexity. This first application-engineered storage system provides unique integration points with Oracle Database which automate storage tuning and data lifecycle management, reduce capacity requirements, and lower TCO.

 

Sample Customers

Tribune Media
Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., Hospital AlemÊo Oswaldo Cruz, DB Schenker Rail, Asia Commercial Bank, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, Ricoh Company Ltd., CyberSolutions Inc., NARA INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, SunGard Availability Services, B&H PhotoVideo,
Buyer's Guide
Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS
October 2024
Free Report: Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS
Find out what your peers are saying about Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cohesity SpanFS vs. Oracle ZFS report.
See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.