Oracle Hudson CI vs TeamCity comparison

Oracle and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Oracle is ranked #33, while JetBrains is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.8. Oracle holds a 0.2% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of JetBrains users are willing to recommend the solution.

Oracle Hudson CI

78 Views
57 Comparison Views

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,524 Views
2,249 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle Hudson CI

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Hudson CI and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, Jenkins and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,875 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Hudson CI

Ranking in Build Automation

33rd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Oracle Hudson CI is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 7.0%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Use Oracle Hudson CI?

Share your opinion

Omakoji Idakwoji

Software Engineer at Home Depot

Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans

I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 39% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 17% of the time

CircleCI vs TeamCity

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 11% of the time

Tekton vs TeamCity

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

November 2024

Download Oracle Hudson CI product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

November 2024

Download TeamCity product report

Also Known As

Hudson CI

No data available

Learn More

Oracle

JetBrains

Overview

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

Sample Customers

Virgin Media

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, Jenkins and others in Build Automation. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.