Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while SAP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 0.3% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

223 Views
158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Read 12 SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise reviews

1,171 Views
609 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service are competing in the database solutions category. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service holds the upper hand due to its advanced features and higher customer satisfaction.

Features: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise offers powerful transaction management, high-performance analytics, and robustness for large-scale applications. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service excels in scalability, automated backups, and integration with Oracle cloud services, with an extensive ecosystem enhancing flexibility and extensibility.

Room for Improvement: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise could enhance its cloud-integration capabilities, user interface modernization, and ease of learning for new users. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service might improve its support for legacy systems, increase offline capabilities, and offer more comprehensive advanced features similar to traditional Oracle databases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise offers a straightforward deployment process with strong support, making it ideal for enterprises with robust IT infrastructure. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service benefits from cloud-centric deployment, providing streamlined processes and extensive support from Oracle, which facilitates ease of access and faster time to value.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise tends to have higher initial setup costs impacting short-term ROI, but can be cost-effective for data-intensive long-term needs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a flexible subscription-based pricing model, appealing to businesses seeking predictable billing and enhanced ROI through integrated cloud features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Offers cost-efficiency as it needs a very small amount of RAM to function

SAP is least bothered about Adaptive Server Enterprise nowadays since it wants to focus on promoting its new product, which is S/4HANA. If SAP gives out new releases and a patch upgrade to improve performance and provide additional options, then SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise can compete with other relational database systems in the market. The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve. I work in a very stable environment, and I prefer a very stable replication and database management system. Most of our company's customers do not want to opt out of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, but SAP has announced that it will be ending its support for it in 2027, and though I feel SAP might extend it, I feel SAP will want to promote its new product. Previously, I heard that SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's end-of-support dates were announced for 2025, but now I think that they have extended it to 2027 or 2030.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"The product is good for tuning."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."

"The actual interface is good."

"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."

"Provides very good integration."

"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."

"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."

"They provide easy integration with other systems."

"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise pros

Cons

"The solution should offer memory management."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service's scalability is an area of concern that can be better."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."

"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."

"In my opinion, product support is not that great from SAP because they have already declared the end-of-date for SAP ASE. They will be stopping product support."

"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."

"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."

"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."

"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."

"User interface could be more user friendly."

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"I rate SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise's pricing a six out of ten."

"Price-wise, the product is worth it since one needs very less infrastructure to use it."

"The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The licensing cost for ASE is pretty low when you compare it with Microsoft SQL Server. If you compare it with SQL Server, it is pretty low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise?

The main thing is it's not getting upgraded to meet today's needs. It's not upgrading at the level of transaction needs. For example, PostgreSQL or Oracle, these are pretty good databases. They can...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 54% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 46% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

SAP HANA vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 63% of the time

SAP SQL Anywhere vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Database vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

March 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

March 2025

Download SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP ASE

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a high-performance relational database management system designed for mission-critical, data-intensive environments. It provides a centralized environment for storing and managing data, with the ability to handle a wide range of data types and a modularization technique allowing easy customization.

SAP ASE is particularly valuable for financial operations, as it offers integrated financial features. The solution also offers various control agents and the ability to match code and database index. SAP ASE has improved daily data collection and program functionality for many organizations.

SAP

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International (ARI), Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba (Grupo Neoenergia), RZD Russian Railways, National Basketball Association - NBA, TALLY

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.