Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Outreach vs SalesLoft comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Outreach
Ranking in Opportunity Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SalesLoft
Ranking in Opportunity Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Opportunity Management category, the mindshare of Outreach is 1.9%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SalesLoft is 0.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Opportunity Management
 

Featured Reviews

NUR HAQUE - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers AI capabilities for transcription and image recognition modeling tasks
In terms of improvements, one significant area for the product is efficiency, particularly when processing large data loads. Similar to other platforms, long recording times lead to extended processing times, which can be inconvenient for users. For instance, a previous client encountered delays due to lengthy recording times. To address this, I implemented a live transcription approach where data is transcribed in real-time, immediately sent to the AI model, and returned quickly. This optimized the process, but enhancing the platform's inherent efficiency would be beneficial.
reviewer2668035 - PeerSpot reviewer
Connecting directly with sales tools facilitates seamless outreach and messaging
Being able to set up the cadences in steps is very helpful, where it moves on to the next step, and also where it connects with SalesLoft ( /products/salesloft-reviews ) Sales Navigator. So far, being able to connect directly, instead of switching back and forth to Sales Navigator, has worked well. Also, being able to send messages directly from SalesLoft ( /products/salesloft-reviews ) through LinkedIn Sales Navigator messaging is very useful. I can do everything right from the SalesLoft page without continuously switching between SalesLoft and Sales Navigator.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution facilitates Git workflow management, enabling me to handle various pull requests from team members. Additionally, I use these tools to deploy applications to different cloud providers, such as GCP and AWS, including AWS EC2 services. The automation tools also streamline testing processes for the code submitted by other developers."
"It's allowed us greater visibility into the number of touches it takes to generate a real opportunity as well as overall visibility to seller activity. We are getting better data on what messaging works when reaching out to prospects."
"Outreach is very good when engaging with sponsors to understand their expectations."
"SalesLoft's customer support has been really good."
 

Cons

"Reporting at the 20,000 foot level needs to be improved. I want to be able to see how many emails are opened twice vs three times vs four times."
"Improvements can be made to accommodate sponsors who are not physically available in the same state. If sponsors are open to it, meetings could be conducted on an online platform to finalize deals more effectively."
"In terms of improvements, one significant area for the product is efficiency, particularly when processing large data loads. Similar to other platforms, long recording times lead to extended processing times, which can be inconvenient for users. For instance, a previous client encountered delays due to lengthy recording times. To address this, I implemented a live transcription approach where data is transcribed in real-time, immediately sent to the AI model, and returned quickly. This optimized the process, but enhancing the platform's inherent efficiency would be beneficial."
"Navigating through emails and LinkedIn messages to find which ones have been opened could be improved. I can see email open rates, but identifying who actually opened them is difficult."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Outreach uses a request-based pricing model. It's pretty affordable. They offer different packages for various scenarios, depending on how you're trying to develop your platform using Outreach. I think that's a good starting point. If our organization scales up or needs more services from the tool, we'd consider upgrading."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Opportunity Management solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Outreach?
Improvements can be made to accommodate sponsors who are not physically available in the same state. If sponsors are open to it, meetings could be conducted on an online platform to finalize deals ...
What is your primary use case for Outreach?
I was the PRN Outreach lead of my club and my college. In this role, I conducted promotions and approached sponsors for my events. I was responsible for organizing multiple events and reaching out ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Outreach?
Outreach uses a request-based pricing model. It's pretty affordable. They offer different packages for various scenarios, depending on how you're trying to develop your platform using Outreach. I t...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Costello
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

cloudera, monogDB, eventbrite, DocuSign, Adobe, Microsoft, Zillow
Patientpop, cognism, vena, pandadoc
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, monday.com, Zoho and others in Opportunity Management. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.