Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pantheon vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Pantheon and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Pantheon is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.5, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. Pantheon holds a 0.6% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pantheon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Pantheon
Read 2 Pantheon reviews
  • 421 Views
  • 336 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews
  • 450 Views
  • 278 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Pantheon and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are in the cloud application management category. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud has an advantage in versatility and advanced cloud-native capabilities, while Pantheon is noted for its pricing and support.

Features: Pantheon features streamlined workflows, automated deployments, and a user-friendly content management environment. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud offers robust container orchestration, enterprise-grade security, and seamless integration with IBM's cloud services, suitable for complex enterprise applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pantheon offers a straightforward deployment process and robust customer support, accessible for businesses without extensive technical expertise. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud, though more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive configuration options. Its customer service meets enterprise-level demands, supporting technical use cases effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Pantheon provides a cost-effective entry point, advantageous for small to medium-sized projects. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud requires a larger initial investment but offers higher long-term ROI due to scalability and enterprise-grade features, catering to larger organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pantheon
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Web Hosting Services (10th)
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
17th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Pantheon is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Abhinand Gokhala K - PeerSpot reviewer
The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools
We are a software development company. We recommend solutions to our clients, but they ask us to compare it with other solutions. Clients compare the monthly costs of Pantheon with other servers and ask us to create the same environment in dedicated servers. If Pantheon reduces its cost, we can confidently suggest it to clients. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
Read full review
Adrian Bilauca - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment
OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."
"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."
"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."
"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."
"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."
"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros
 

Cons

"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."
"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."
"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."
"Many of the managed services are not accessible."
"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."
"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."
"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."
"The pricing is a little high in China."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Educational Organization
12%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pantheon?
Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pantheon?
The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Pantheon?
Pantheon's design is not familiar to use. It could be more user-friendly.
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Pantheon Logo
Amazon AWS vs Pantheon
Compared 45% of the time
Acquia Cloud vs Pantheon Logo
Acquia Cloud vs Pantheon
Compared 11% of the time
Kinsta vs Pantheon Logo
Kinsta vs Pantheon
Compared 11% of the time
GoDaddy vs Pantheon Logo
GoDaddy vs Pantheon
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Azure vs Pantheon Logo
Microsoft Azure vs Pantheon
Compared 8% of the time
More Pantheon Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
April 2025
Pantheon reportDownload Pantheon product report
Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
April 2025
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report
 

Overview

Pantheon is the world’s fastest hosting for Drupal and WordPress. It comes down to our super-efficient container-based platform. Multiple independent benchmarks have compared Pantheon with other providers, and we consistently come out on top.

Pantheon

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Patch, Maine Today, Alley Interactice, Scranton Gillette, AdRoll, Cisco, nVidia, Boston Herald, Tableau, Dell, Kyriba, Huddle, IBM
edenor, Ford
Buyer's Guide
Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.