Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker comparison

PICO and Statseeker are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. PICO is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while Statseeker is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. PICO holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Statseeker’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PICO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Statseeker users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Pico Corvil Analytics are competing products in the field of network monitoring and analytics. Pico Corvil Analytics has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher cost.

Features:Statseeker provides real-time network visibility, simplified dashboard functionality, and focuses on efficient performance insights. Pico Corvil Analytics offers in-depth data analytics, detailed packet-level data capture, and analysis for granular data insights.

Room for Improvement:Statseeker could enhance its data analytics depth, broaden its feature set, and improve in providing detailed insights. Pico Corvil Analytics could simplify its deployment process, offer a more intuitive user interface, and become more cost-effective for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Statseeker offers a straightforward deployment model with excellent technical service for quick setup. Pico Corvil Analytics requires a more complex setup but compensates with strong customer training and support services.

Pricing and ROI:Statseeker is cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, providing a solid ROI by focusing on essential network monitoring. Pico Corvil Analytics, while pricier, delivers higher ROI through its advanced capabilities suitable for businesses needing detailed data analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA

CTO at Redeswirelessbrasil

May 3, 2024

Has a single dashboard, but is expensive

We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature. The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Mar 15, 2023

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Jun 17, 2019

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."

"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"With the Corvil Stored Data Analyzer module, we can use it for test data or a set of production data to set up the configuration for latency setup, so we can use the fields to correlate messages."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"The most important for us is how fast this solution is, as well as the granularity that you can get to, such as per-minute statistics."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."

"The technical support needs improvement."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

55%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

10%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?

The technical support needs improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about Pico Corvil Analytics?

As part of my role in monitoring multiple client connections, I would use Pico Corvil Analytics to set up alerts for ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pico Corvil Analytics?

Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pico Corvil Analytics?

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to ou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping dro...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 37% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 31% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 21% of the time

InfluxDB vs Juniper Mist Premium Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 81% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 19% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 100% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

November 2024

Download Juniper Mist Premium Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

October 2024

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

October 2024

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

No data available

Corvil

No data available

Learn More

Juniper

PICO

Statseeker

Overview

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is a comprehensive network analytics solution that provides organizations with valuable insights into their network performance and user experience. The primary use case of this product is to enable IT teams to proactively monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their network infrastructure.

The most valuable functionality of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is its AI-driven insights and recommendations. Leveraging machine learning algorithms, it analyzes vast amounts of network data to identify anomalies, predict potential issues, and suggest remediation actions. This proactive approach helps organizations minimize network downtime, improve user experience, and optimize network performance.

By providing real-time visibility into network performance, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics helps organizations quickly identify and resolve network issues. It offers detailed analytics on network traffic, application performance, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to pinpoint the root cause of problems and take immediate action. This not only reduces troubleshooting time but also enhances overall network reliability.

Furthermore, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics enables organizations to optimize their network infrastructure. It provides insights into network capacity utilization, application usage patterns, and user behavior, allowing IT teams to make informed decisions about network design, resource allocation, and capacity planning. This helps organizations to ensure that their network is efficiently utilized and can support the growing demands of their users.

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker

October 2024

Free Report: Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pico Corvil Analytics vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.