Planview Daptiv vs Sciforma comparison

Planview and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #17, while Sciforma is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.5. Planview holds a 1.0% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

223 Views
113 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

262 Views
209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Sciforma and Planview Daptiv are competing in the project portfolio management space. While Sciforma excels in pricing and support, Planview Daptiv offers superior features which might justify a higher investment.

Features: Sciforma offers resource management, project scheduling, and time tracking. Planview Daptiv is known for its portfolio management and detailed reporting tools. Planview Daptiv's feature set may provide more strategic value for complex projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sciforma is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, enabling a smooth transition. Planview Daptiv provides a flexible deployment model but might involve a more comprehensive onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: Sciforma presents a competitive setup cost and a promising ROI due to its strong support and affordability. Planview Daptiv involves a higher initial cost, justified by features that may lead to significant long-term ROI for resource-heavy projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Antonio Lira

Territory Manager LATAM at LeaseWeb

Do not be afraid to migrate to cloud solutions

I started using Daptiv PPM at SAP R/3, 22 module implementation, with over 80 functional team members, in different geographic locations. It definitely gave us the opportunity to centralize all schedules per module and assemble work teams for each subproject, binding them with co-dependent tasks in other modules. This type of tool allowed us to finish the back office stage just a week behind the original baseline, a real record for SAP R/3 implementation.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

University

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Cloud Solution Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 100% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 36% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

March 2025

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

March 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

No data available

One2team

Overview

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

April 2025

Free Report: Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Daptiv vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.