Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Microsoft and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Sciforma is ranked #12. Microsoft holds a 5.0% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews

3,600 Views
1,836 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

2,166 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma are competing project management solutions. Sciforma has an advantage with comprehensive features for large enterprises, while Microsoft Project Server excels in integration with Microsoft Office tools and collaboration efficiency.

Features: Microsoft Project Server integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office Suite and enhances collaboration and reporting efficiency. Sciforma offers flexible project portfolio management, robust resource management capabilities, and broader customization options for extensive project tracking and analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server benefits from integration with existing Microsoft environments, simplifying deployment for businesses already using Microsoft systems. Sciforma's flexible deployment model accommodates various IT infrastructures and provides proactive customer service appealing to a wider range of industries.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Project Server typically involves a higher initial setup cost, requiring investment in Microsoft infrastructure, but offers strong ROI for companies already utilizing Microsoft ecosystems. Sciforma presents a cost-effective initial investment, focusing on long-term ROI with customizable pricing and scalability. Microsoft Project Server aligns with enterprises invested in Microsoft solutions, whereas Sciforma provides value through adaptable pricing and enhanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 5.0%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Project Server	5.0%
Sciforma	3.9%
Other	91.1%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

JorgeValenzuela

Owner at CPSTECH

Collaborative task management simplifies office work, but agile methodology features need enhancement

In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using cloud drives like OneDrive. Another feature is Kanban or other features such as Scrum with agile methodologies. Microsoft Project Server is limited and falls short in using agile methodologies, which is the most important issue to improve. Microsoft Project Server is a good product; it is possible to improve regarding enabling agile features because the teams in my work are using Trello and Jira products due to the blackboards, Kanban, and Scrum. To do activities and stopping activities is more comfortable and easier to use, making it more practical in my teamwork. These features do not exist in Microsoft Project Server.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the gantt charts. It's easy to use for me."

"The solution scales well."

"Microsoft Project Server has improved our organization by providing visibility of all project portfolios in one place."

"The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects."

"It has been helpful for calculating the time of completion of our projects and looking at the critical parts of our projects."

"We use the tool in our IT-related projects. All IT efforts are managed using the Microsoft Project Server. Every week, we have a project status meeting where we demonstrate the project's status using the tool. We track tasks and progress, assign owners, and monitor milestones and all project-related work using it."

"It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution."

"It's stable and reliable."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"ONE2TEAM revolutionizes the way of working: The cloud based solution for project and portfolio management with very strong collaboration functionality lets executives and team members access their work environment anytime, anywhere to monitor program status, act, and complete a personalized checklist of tasks without the need to send emails or create presentations, simply working together in a dashboard."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"The initial setup is complex."

"There are certain shortcomings in the documentation part where improvements are required."

"There are more user-friendly products on the market that I would suggest using in preference to this one."

"The price of the product must be improved."

"Improvements are needed in the technical support process, aiming for a better user experience."

"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."

"From a features perspective, the insights around the cost and budget could be improved; competitor products are more robust, and Project Server has a very limited feature in terms of reporting, especially around cost control, with built-in reports and analytics that are very minimal and far behind what competitors offer."

"This is a good product but we have struggled with stability from time to time. The service has stopped intermittently and it has been difficult to find a reason why."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."

"The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software."

"Microsoft Project Server is an expensive solution. Small businesses will not be able to afford it."

"The product is expensive."

"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."

"I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."

"There are some payments related to the licensing cost of Microsoft Project Server."

"There is a licensing cost."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Construction Company

12%

Insurance Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?

Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 6% of the time

PowerSteering vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 12% of the time

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs Sciforma

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Sciforma

Compared 5% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Sciforma

Compared 4% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

May 2026

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

May 2026

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

One2team

Overview

Microsoft Project Server streamlines project management with features like resource allocation, project scheduling, and SharePoint integration. It's valued for its intuitive interface and ability to provide comprehensive insights through advanced reporting and dashboards.

Designed to enhance collaboration and efficiency, Microsoft Project Server supports complex task management by integrating seamlessly with SharePoint. It offers tools like Gantt charts and timeline management for effective tracking. Users benefit from Excel and Power BI compatibility, enhancing analytical capabilities. Despite its powerful functionalities, users identify areas for improvement in tool integration, resource management, and collaboration features. There are calls for a modernized interface and more flexible pricing. While the cloud version boasts continuous updates, the on-premises model lags behind.

What are the main features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Allocation: Optimizes workload across projects.
Project Scheduling: Helps plan timelines effectively.
SharePoint Integration: Facilitates collaboration.
Gantt Charts: Visual timeline for task tracking.
Power BI Integration: Advanced data analytics capabilities.

What benefits should you look for in Microsoft Project Server reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Easy to navigate and learn.
Scalability: Adjusts to growing project demands.
Customization: Tailors to specific project needs.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive project overviews.

Microsoft Project Server finds its application across industries by providing tools for planning IT infrastructure and managing enterprise-level projects. It helps organizations document projects and manage portfolios, enabling clear visibility into performance through milestones and KPIs.

Microsoft

Sciforma is a comprehensive project portfolio management tool designed to streamline complex workflows and improve team collaboration, ideal for businesses seeking efficient project execution.

Sciforma facilitates project management by offering a robust platform that integrates planning, tracking, and resource management. It supports businesses in achieving operational efficiency through its customizable structure, flexible reporting, and scalable solutions. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for teams to adopt and integrate into daily operations, ensuring that project objectives align with business goals. Sciforma's flexibility and feature set make it a strategic choice for improving project delivery and enhancing decision-making.

What are the most valuable features of Sciforma?

Resource Management: Dynamic tools to allocate and optimize resources effectively
Project Tracking: Comprehensive tracking capabilities for real-time project insights
Customization: Tailored solutions to fit specific business processes
Reporting: Detailed reports to support business intelligence and decision-making

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Sciforma?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines project processes leading to increased productivity
Cost Management: Better budget control with real-time financial tracking
Scalability: Adapts to business growth and evolving project requirements
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through integrated communication tools

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and construction, Sciforma is implemented to address specific demands like regulatory compliance, financial planning, and milestone tracking. These industries benefit from Sciforma's ability to deliver tailored processes that meet their unique challenges, helping them achieve strategic objectives while maintaining operational efficiency. Sciforma's adaptability ensures it addresses industry-specific project management needs efficiently, making it a preferred tool for experts.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

April 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.