No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sciforma
Ranking in Project Portfolio Management
13th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Project Management Software (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 5.7%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Project Server5.7%
Sciforma3.8%
Other90.5%
Project Portfolio Management
 

Featured Reviews

Mouloud Fourali - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Digital Research Alliance of Canada
Visual project planning enhances collaboration and proactive management
The dependency management in Microsoft Project is highly valuable, as it visually maps dependencies and impacts within a project plan. The online version facilitates easy collaboration without having to share multiple versions of the file. The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.
reviewer2320980 - PeerSpot reviewer
Programm Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees
A scalable solution can be used for time tracking, portfolio management, and project management
We use Sciforma for time tracking, portfolio management, project management, resource simulation tickets, and workflow The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma. The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is user-friendly."
"Microsoft Project Server is a scalable solution."
"We use the tool in our IT-related projects. All IT efforts are managed using the Microsoft Project Server. Every week, we have a project status meeting where we demonstrate the project's status using the tool. We track tasks and progress, assign owners, and monitor milestones and all project-related work using it."
"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."
"It provides us with complete visibility of resource allocation on a global team."
"I found the portfolio management valuable."
"The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects."
"The solution is easy to use."
"ONE2TEAM revolutionizes the way of working: The cloud based solution for project and portfolio management with very strong collaboration functionality lets executives and team members access their work environment anytime, anywhere to monitor program status, act, and complete a personalized checklist of tasks without the need to send emails or create presentations, simply working together in a dashboard."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
 

Cons

"Microsoft Project Server could improve by making the solution more user-friendly."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Microsoft Project Server's user interface is pretty average, and sometimes it can have bugs."
"Collaboration should be better integrated in the desktop version."
"The solution's synchronization with Jira Projects should be improved."
"This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them."
"There are certain shortcomings in the documentation part where improvements are required."
"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Project Server is an expensive solution. Small businesses will not be able to afford it."
"We pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."
"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, and our licensing is based on the agreement."
"I would rate the price a six out of ten."
"Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than other solutions on the market. We purchase the license annually."
"It is an inexpensive product."
"The technical assistance is expensive but the solution is an open source software."
"The product is expensive."
"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."
"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Construction Company
12%
Insurance Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise33
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?
The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is standard, around $200-$250, but I think it's actually $80 to $100 per year. The pricing for Microsoft Project Server is relative; I would say it is cheap.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?
In order to improve Microsoft Project Server, collaborative features could be enhanced, as it is possible to improve it in a collaborative way similar to other office products, for example, using c...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Project Server?
Today, the use cases for Microsoft Project Server are for office tasks, such as writing in Word processors, worksheets in Excel, Word processors with Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

MS Project Server
One2team
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.