Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Microsoft and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Sciforma is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.5. Microsoft holds a 6.3% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 61 Microsoft Project Server reviews

923 Views
674 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

262 Views
209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma are project management solutions. Sciforma seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features and simpler deployment, catering better to complex projects.

Features: Microsoft Project Server specializes in project scheduling, resource management, and integration within Microsoft products. Sciforma offers project portfolio management capabilities, advanced analytics, and customization options, providing more flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server requires a complex setup using Microsoft infrastructure, while Sciforma's cloud-based model allows for simpler deployment. Sciforma provides more personalized customer support, whereas Microsoft Project Server relies on standardized channels.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Project Server has higher initial costs due to infrastructure and licenses, benefiting users within the Microsoft ecosystem. Sciforma's SaaS model offers predictable pricing with potentially faster ROI, thanks to lower startup investment and scalable pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 6.3%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Sean Achim

Managing Director at Knights Innovation Support Centre

Unlock comprehensive reporting and management with robust data extraction

The major advantage for me in using Microsoft Project Server is the SQL Server component. Using Power BI and SQL Server, I can extract a lot more data. The combination of Microsoft Project with Project Server and SharePoint provides a perfect solution for me. This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's fine to navigate for a layperson."

"Resource allocation is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Project Server."

"Microsoft Project Server is simple to use."

"The solution is stable."

"It can scale well."

"The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect."

"The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable."

"The level of customization is significant, and there are ample resources available online about how to use it."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

Cons

"The reporting in the desktop version is not highly customizable or professional compared to other solutions."

"The solution needs to be much more stable."

"There are certain shortcomings in the documentation part where improvements are required."

"The solution should be made more collaborative."

"Permission management needs improvement."

"It would be better if the solution had some more training or resources available for a person who is new to Microsoft Project Server."

"The main drawback of Microsoft Project Server is that it is offline. Having it online would offer better access to other managers."

"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the pricing a one out of ten because the price is way too high."

"Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than other solutions on the market. We purchase the license annually."

"It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."

"The price of the Microsoft Project Server could improve, it is expensive here in Africa. When comparing Microsoft Project Server to Oracle Primavera for us, Microsoft Project Server is quite cost-effective."

"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."

"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."

"It is an inexpensive product."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Cloud Solution Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?

The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

The pricing model is currently a challenge since it seems aligned to push users cloud-based. Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if al...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

I am not convinced that the pricing model is the right one. Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some. Addi...

See all answers

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Project vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 24% of the time

Planisware vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Smartsheet vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 34% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 29% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

March 2025

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

March 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

One2team

Overview

Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.

Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.

What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Management: Allocate and track resources efficiently to optimize productivity.
Portfolio Analysis: Assess and prioritize projects based on strategic alignment and constraints.
Time Reporting: Streamline time tracking and reporting for accurate project insights.
Integration with Office: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office applications for enhanced productivity.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data security with customizable permissions and compliance standards.

What benefits can users expect from Microsoft Project Server?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and collaboration among project teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers comprehensive data analytics for strategic planning.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines project management workflows for increased productivity.
Cost Management: Enables effective budget tracking and financial control.

Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.

Microsoft

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.