OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma comparison

OpenText and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Sciforma is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 2.4% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

884 Views
424 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

581 Views
366 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 24, 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Sciforma compete in the project management software market. OpenText stands out for its comprehensive feature set suitable for complex environments, while Sciforma is preferred for its user-friendly approach and flexibility, offering a significant edge in usability.

Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides robust project planning, resource management, and financial tools. It allows for detailed customization and seamless integrations. Sciforma features strong time tracking, collaboration tools, and focuses on scalable, user-friendly interfaces. OpenText emphasizes customization, whereas Sciforma puts usability at the forefront of its offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText's deployment involves complexity due to extensive customization options, possibly leading to longer implementation. It includes comprehensive support which may require additional training. Sciforma ensures a straightforward deployment through intuitive onboarding. Its support is known for being responsive, facilitating quick adaptation, with an easier initial setup compared to OpenText.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText usually has higher setup costs because of its feature-rich offerings and customization needs, aiming for considerable returns in complex project settings. Sciforma presents a competitive pricing structure with a flexible subscription model that caters well to varied budgets, offering compelling ROI through efficient operations and quick implementation. OpenText benefits complex needs over time, while Sciforma provides immediate cost benefits and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 2.4%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.8%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	2.4%
Sciforma	3.8%
Other	93.8%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Useful for resource and financial management but needs to change Oracle database

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

"I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do."

"Resource management: The resource management module is very complete and covers most of the time all needs of customers."

"The portfolio management and the resource management are the key features."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."

"Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products."

"Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability."

"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."

"Sometimes features in PPM don't work as expected, or our users request a new feature. Typically, our partner vendor can deploy those changes. But there have been a few instances when we had to raise it with Micro Focus because it's beyond the ability of our partner vendor. When we raise the issue with Micro Focus, it sometimes takes time because it needs support from other customers using PPM, not just our bank. It goes through a voting system. Other customers need to vote for the feature. The features that get the most votes will possibly be added."

"User interface continues to be poor. The product does not have a similar view in the different modules, e.g., staffing vs financial management, it looks like you are working with a different product and it is not easy to use or intuitive."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."

"Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released."

"I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

"Portfolio scenarios: This is a very powerful feature. However, it’s limited to analyses."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

24%

Insurance Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 38% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 33% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 30% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 20% of the time

monday.com for Enterprise vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma

Compared 11% of the time

KeyedIn Projects vs Sciforma

Compared 10% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

August 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

September 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

One2team

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

September 2025

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.