OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Sciforma comparison

OpenText and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Sciforma is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 3.1% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

1,161 Views
534 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

908 Views
463 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) and Sciforma compete in the project management software market. Sciforma holds the upper hand due to its robust feature set and customization capabilities.

Features: OpenText PPM focuses on project tracking, resource management, and comprehensive project oversight. Sciforma offers advanced customization, flexible project templates, and seamless integration options, emphasizing personalization and ease of integration with existing systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText PPM is easy to deploy with responsive customer service, making it suitable for new users. Sciforma provides a flexible deployment model, adaptable to various organizational needs, giving it an edge in integration and implementation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText PPM is more cost-effective upfront, delivering rapid ROI through lower initial setup costs. Sciforma, while potentially pricier, offers substantial long-term ROI due to its expansive features and customization potential. The distinction lies in immediate cost savings with OpenText PPM versus long-term value with Sciforma.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is 3.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management	3.1%
Sciforma	3.8%
Other	93.1%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

workflow streamlines processes and ensures activities are completed properly

The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow. The workflow is amazing and highly effective in streamlining processes. Additionally, it is used to ensure that activities are completed properly, as part of the typical project and portfolio management. It meets my needs as a good project and portfolio management tool.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."

"Resource management: The resource management module is very complete and covers most of the time all needs of customers."

"Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability."

"It's a very detailed tool. As far as an enterprise is concerned, it gives you the flexibility to manage everything: portfolios, projects, finances, proposals, resources, and time... It takes care of even the minor details that need to be captured. The project management functionality is configured really well within the tool. That stands out."

"The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

"The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."

"It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on."

"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"Sometimes features in PPM don't work as expected, or our users request a new feature. Typically, our partner vendor can deploy those changes. But there have been a few instances when we had to raise it with Micro Focus because it's beyond the ability of our partner vendor. When we raise the issue with Micro Focus, it sometimes takes time because it needs support from other customers using PPM, not just our bank. It goes through a voting system. Other customers need to vote for the feature. The features that get the most votes will possibly be added."

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."

"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."

"The user experience of the product needs to be improved"

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good."

"Currently, HPE PPM does not allow “Project” approval, but only simple “Demand Request” approval (mobility)."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 14% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 13% of the time

Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 13% of the time

monday.com vs Sciforma

Compared 11% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 7% of the time

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs Sciforma

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma

Compared 7% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

January 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

December 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

One2team

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.