Planview Portfolios vs Sciforma comparison

Planview and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planview is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Sciforma is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.5. Planview holds a 7.4% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Planview Portfolios

Read 63 Planview Portfolios reviews

997 Views
576 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

262 Views
209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planview Portfolios and Sciforma are both project portfolio management solutions. Sciforma may have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set and scalability, despite Planview's focus on competitive pricing and support.

Features: Planview Portfolios is known for its advanced resource management, strategic planning, and real-time reporting capabilities. It provides flexible visualization tools that enhance project tracking and decision-making. Sciforma uses a modular approach allowing customization to fit various project needs and ensuring seamless integration with other enterprise systems. Users often highlight the depth of Sciforma's project management functions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sciforma offers a cloud-based deployment that simplifies implementation in diverse IT environments and provides comprehensive support through dedicated teams for setup and queries. In comparison, Planview's deployment is also cloud-oriented, backed by extensive documentation and responsive support channels. Sciforma’s proactive customer service contributes to easier adaptation and faster problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios generally positions itself with competitive setup costs, promising strong ROI through efficiency gains in resource utilization and strategic alignment. Sciforma may feature a higher initial investment, but its extensive feature set can justify the cost over time, often leading to significant process improvements and operational scalability. While Planview appeals to cost-sensitive buyers, Sciforma is valued for its broader impact on project management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (14th)

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

11th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 7.4%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Hillman

Global Head of Portfolio Management at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

User-friendly interface, but the reporting could be improved

The reporting is poor and requires improvement. The tiles and exception-based activities in the application are sufficient to get by. However, when it comes to producing executive reports, MI reports, or any other type of reporting, we must exit Planview and work offline. We have been working with them to improve on that, as well as using some of the Power BI capabilities that have been available for a while, but it's still more difficult than it should be. In the next release, I would like to be able to use the data in the tool to gain insight much more easily.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us the vast ability to churn out-of-the-box reports and have an overview about approach rates and resource utilization."

"It has helped improve governance, mostly. People want to know where their money's going. Projects sponsors need to know what we're spending money on and what our burn rate is. Planview can give that to you straightaway."

"The sheer amount of information available in one single interface is valuable. Everything is there. It is also a lot of work to maintain all the information, but generally, you can find everything you need within this one tool."

"The resource management and assignment features are valuable. The timesheet management is also valuable because that is a requirement for us. So, the ability to see timesheet forecasting and timesheet actual submission from resources has been very useful and valuable to us."

"The portfolio and technology management are well built."

"We use expenditures quite a bit. We put in forecast expenditures and then we actualize them below the line in the little box in the bottom tray. Being able to track the project with relevant milestones is also valuable. Milestones are valuable because it helps us to keep the project on track. The expenditures are valuable because we need to be able to understand expenses that are beyond the regular resources in the projects."

"I like that it's an enterprise environment. I can look across everything that's going on and have a sense of what is going on within the organization."

"Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, and collaboration platforms."

More Planview Portfolios pros

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

Cons

"When it comes to reporting there are some challenges with integration."

"The technical support is a little overworked. At least, they have been in the past year. We need them to focus on somethings from time to time. You can tell that they're really focusing on many things. It has gotten better, but I think they could still use some relief."

"We have required more time from our resource managers to spend time in the tool. The adoption has been slower than we would have hoped. So, I would think from a rollout perspective, if Planview could help us with material which gets non-Planview users or previously light Planview users to become more heavy users of the system, then this would help us with the rollout."

"It is not an end-user-friendly product, and that's really the biggest thing. The hardest or the biggest hurdle I've ever had to face was adoption. I did the installation of the HP product in 2011. The company used it from 2011 to 2015, and the adoption was very high. When I was given the Planview product, adoption was very low. It wasn't as extensively used. We actually had people who wanted to go back to HP PPM because the interface of Planview was so broken, and it still is to some degree. So, it is not user-friendly. It doesn't flow the way a project manager thinks. What we did with HP PPM was a lot more manual programming. It wasn't as nice in terms of the interface, and it wasn't as pretty, but you could design it and build it so that everything flows with the way you worked, but Planview doesn't quite do that. There are a lot of screens. You have to jump back and forth. There are so many different places you have to go to just to do some basic tasks. That's the biggest thing that has really hindered adoption."

"The content management definitely needs to improve. We don't really use content management for projects inside Enterprise One. We have actually switched to a SharePoint site. We have a feed from Enterprise One every night of all the projects that are created."

"Support is still a challenge. We find it challenging more due to the responsiveness and getting a case or ticket assigned to an analyst. That's what I was just doing. I was following up on an email that we opened last week. We haven't heard anything, so following up on that."

"When you think of planning at a PI level, roadmap planning, or release planning, I think they should make a little more headway into how agile delivery works, tying it back into the financials and the planning to Planview. I think it would be good."

"We had issues with the data rephrasing."

More Planview Portfolios cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know about the actual pricing. I have not come across any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"We are on the Flex licenses."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $50,000 USD annually."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore."

"When we went through that process, I believe it is competitive with others on the market. However, there are less expensive options available. It's a more premium offering at a higher price."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Cloud Solution Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Planview Portfolios?

Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM) syst...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios is not too expensive. You get what you paid for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Enhancements are needed in: Advanced reporting and analytics: While Planview Management provides robust reporting and analytics capabilities, further enhancements could include more advanced data v...

See all answers

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 13% of the time

LeanIX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 10% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

Planisware vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 36% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 18% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

March 2025

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

March 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

One2team

Overview

Planview Portfolios offers a comprehensive platform for managing IT, project and resource management, along with strategic planning. The tool focuses on optimizing resource allocation and financial analysis, supporting global operations.

Organizations use Planview Portfolios to streamline project tracking from inception to completion, enhancing strategic alignment with corporate objectives. The tool integrates with platforms like JIRA to provide seamless workflows and supports critical business processes, including budgeting and capacity planning. Teams benefit from customized configurations and robust reporting, further supporting effective decision-making. Despite its strengths, improvements are sought in navigation, documentation, and integration capabilities.

What are the key features?

Customizable interface: Allows personalization to meet specific needs.
Comprehensive resource and financial management: Enables detailed tracking and analysis.
Robust reporting: Provides extensive data insights.
Integration with Power BI: Enhances data access for stakeholders.
Resource and capacity planning: Optimizes workforce allocation.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved strategic alignment: Supports better decision-making.
Increased operational efficiency: Streamlines project management.
Enhanced resource optimization: Ensures optimal use of workforce.
Better financial insights: Allows precise budget tracking.

In industries like IT and project management, Planview Portfolios supports complex portfolio handling, ensuring visibility across global operations. Companies in these sectors leverage its strategic planning tools for strategic alignment and resource management, integrating with existing systems for improved process efficiency.

Planview

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma

April 2025

Free Report: Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview Portfolios vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.