Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024
Planview Portfolios and OpenText Project and Portfolio Management compete in the project management software sector. Planview Portfolios appears to have the upper hand with robust demand management and flexible configurations, while OpenText focuses on resource management and financial analysis, making it highly suited for strategic alignment.
Features: Planview Portfolios enables multiple teams to collaborate on diverse projects, integrates with Power BI for detailed reporting, and offers consolidated work management. OpenText shines with its comprehensive financial management, detailed cost and budget tracking, and effective capacity planning, catering particularly well to large enterprises.
Room for Improvement: Planview Portfolios may enhance its user interface and reduce reliance on external tools for reporting. Resource management complexities require simplification for user-friendliness. OpenText's user interface feels outdated with insufficient project approval functions, and improved mobile integration is demanded for modern users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios provides versatile deployment options across various infrastructures, yet experiences inconsistent customer service, especially in technical support. OpenText primarily remains on-premises with dependable technical assistance, yet its deployment flexibility lags behind cloud transitions.
Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios, though expensive, is seen as valuable for extensive features and adaptable licensing. OpenText is competitively priced with transparent fee structures, though potentially prohibitively costly for smaller businesses. ROI benefits are more evident through strategic planning than direct financial metrics.
