Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Plutora vs ServiceNow DevOps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Plutora
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (17th), Test Management Tools (25th)
ServiceNow DevOps
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Value Stream Management Software category, the mindshare of Plutora is 4.8%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow DevOps is 3.4%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Value Stream Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use Plutora?
Share your opinion
Dinesh Khanna - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that offers useful templates and is very easy to integrate with CI/CD tools
Initially, I faced some difficulties with the product's initial setup phase. After handling the setup phase for other applications, I don't feel the need to take much time to handle the integration or implementation part attached to the solution. The solution is deployed on the public cloud services offered by Azure. The time needed to take care of the deployment phase of the solution depends on the project and the weightage of an application in an environment. It is important to see how long it takes to handle the deployment process stage by stage. During the product's testing part, it takes time since there is a need to take care of the integration part along with unit testing, functional testing, and performance testing before it is made available specifically for an environment after considering aspects from a security point of view. After the aforementioned aspects are taken care of, the product needs to go for business approvals and then through stages, including the QA stage, before reaching the final stage related to production and deployment. Our organization has more than 20 applications that we manage with the help of the solution, because of which most of the things are automated across the company, and only three or four people are sufficient to handle all the applications.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Value Stream Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
39%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ServiceNow DevOps?
The API part of the solution is very easy to integrate with CI/CD tools, which helps our company achieve our goals related to the integration part.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow DevOps?
As of now, our company doesn't see any area where the solution has any shortcomings. From a documentation point of view, there are certain areas of concern, and improvements are to be made to make ...
What is your primary use case for ServiceNow DevOps?
My company is in the process of integrating Azure DevOps with ServiceNow. The solution is mainly used for deployment purposes with change requests whenever there is a need to do production, deploym...
 

Also Known As

Plutora Release Management, Plutora Release, Plutora Test Environment Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eBay, United Energy and Multinet Gas (UE & MG), Service NSW, AMP, Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC)
Syntax, Bridgewater Bank, Capita
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, OpenText, CloudBees and others in Value Stream Management Software. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.