Polyspace Code Prover vs Snyk comparison

Read 48 Snyk reviews

21,147 Views
10,151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Polyspace Code Prover

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 4, 2025

Polyspace Code Prover and Snyk are key contenders in the software development and security space. Polyspace Code Prover excels in code safety checks while Snyk leads with its robust vulnerability scanning and CI/CD integrations, making it an optimal choice for security-focused developers.

Features: Polyspace Code Prover shines with its static code analysis, pinpointing runtime conditions and potential coding errors with high precision. It ensures code accuracy and reliability, key for meeting safety standards. Snyk provides a comprehensive vulnerability database, real-time monitoring, and seamless CI/CD integration, enhancing developer security processes.

Room for Improvement: Polyspace could enhance its integration capabilities with more development tools, offer more flexible pricing options, and expand its feature set for non-automotive industries. Snyk could improve its on-prem installation affordability, expand its library size to rival competitors, and enhance its licensing compliance support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Polyspace Code Prover offers thorough setup support and professional integration services, ensuring a smooth deployment for developers. Snyk provides a cloud-based model with extensive documentation for easy onboarding, backed by prompt and efficient customer support services.

Pricing and ROI: Polyspace may have a higher initial cost but compensates with its potential to prevent costly post-deployment issues, leading to significant ROI. Snyk offers competitive pricing tiers with a strong focus on ROI through proactive vulnerability management, justifying the investment for firms valuing security innovation.

To learn more, read our detailed Polyspace Code Prover vs. Snyk Report (Updated: July 2025).

Polyspace Code Prover vs. Snyk

Download the complete report

Helped 863,679 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polyspace Code Prover

Ranking in Application Security Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Cloud Management (14th), Container Security (5th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), DevSecOps (2nd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Polyspace Code Prover is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 7.5%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Panchakarla

Functional Safety Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A reliable solution that provides excellent features and detects memory corruption

The run time analysis process must be improved. If we do not run with the main loop, it generates its own main and doesn’t allow developers to modify the execution sequences. The solution must provide more flexibility to the developers to manipulate the runtime analysis tools. The developer must be allowed to modify the main sequence. It will be very easy for them to test their use cases. Otherwise, Polyspace generates a random main file and executes all the functions randomly.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles

The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts, and null pointer dereferences."

"Polyspace Code Prover is a very user-friendly tool."

"The outputs are very reliable."

"Polyspace Code Prover has made me realize it differs from other static code analysis tools because it runs the code. So it's quite distinct in that aspect."

"The product detects memory corruptions."

"The CLI feature is quite useful because it gives us a lot of flexibility in what we want to do. If you use the UI, all the information is there and you can see what Snyk is showing you, but there is nothing else that you can change. However, when you use the CLI, then you can use commands and can get the output or response back from Snyk. You can also take advantage of that output in a different way. For the same reason, we have been using the CLI for the hard gate in the pipeline: Obtain a particular CDSS score for vulnerability. Based on that information, we can then decide if we want to block or allow the build. We have more flexibility if we use the CLI."

"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."

"It has a nice dashboard where I can see all the vulnerabilities and risks that they provided. I can also see the category of any risk, such as medium, high, and low. They provide the input priority-wise. The team can target the highest one first, and then they can go to medium and low ones."

"A main feature of Snyk is that when you go with SCA, you do get properly done security composition, also from the licensing and open-source parameters perspective. A lot of companies often use open-source libraries or frameworks in their code, which is a big security concern. Snyk deals with all the things and provides you with a proper report about whether any open-source code or framework that you are using is vulnerable. In that way, Snyk is very good as compared to other tools."

"The most valuable features of Snyk are vulnerability scanning and automation. The automation the solution brings around vulnerability scanning is useful."

"The most valuable feature is that they add a lot of their own information to the vulnerabilities. They describe vulnerabilities and suggest their own mitigations or version upgrades. The information was the winning factor when we compared Snyk to others. This is what gave it more impact."

"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."

"Our customers find container scans most valuable. They are always talking about it."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"I'd like the data to be taken from any format."

"Automation could be a challenge."

"The tool has some stability issues."

"Using Code Prover on large applications crashes sometimes."

"One of the main disadvantages is the time it takes to initiate the first run."

"DAST has shortcomings, and Snyk needs to improve and overcome such shortcomings."

"Compatibility with other products would be great."

"The way Snyk notifies if we have an issue, there are a few options: High vulnerability or medium vulnerability. The problem with that is high vulnerabilities are too broad, because there are too many. If you enable notifications, you get a lot of notifications, When you get many notifications, they become irrelevant because they're not specific. I would prefer to have control over the notifications and somehow decide if I want to get only exploitable vulnerabilities or get a specific score for a vulnerability. Right now, we receive too many high vulnerabilities. If we enable notifications, then we just get a lot of spam message. Therefore, we would like some type of filtering system to be built-in for the system to be more precise."

"There is always more work to do around managing the volume of information when you've got thousands of vulnerabilities. Trying to get those down to zero is virtually impossible, either through ignoring them all or through fixing them. That filtering or information management is always going to be something that can be improved."

"They were a couple of issues which happened because Snyk lacked some documentation on the integration side. Snyk is lacking a lot of documentation, and I would like to see them improve this. This is where we struggle a bit. For example, if something breaks, we can't figure out how to fix that issue. It may be a very simple thing, but because we don't have the proper documentation around an issue, it takes us a bit longer."

"Basically the licensing costs are a little bit expensive."

"It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the paid version."

"It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value."

"Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium."

"Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost."

"The product has good pricing."

"Snyk is an expensive solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution."

"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"We are using the open-source version for the scans."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

38%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Polyspace Code Prover?

When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Polyspace Code Prover?

We use the paid version.

What needs improvement with Polyspace Code Prover?

I'm still trying to use constraints with range propagation, but I can't get it to work properly, and I haven't found any documentation. It require support. There could be an issue with range propag...

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

Coverity vs Polyspace Code Prover

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 21% of the time

Klocwork vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 19% of the time

CodeSonar vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs Polyspace Code Prover

Compared 3% of the time

More Polyspace Code Prover Competitors

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 11% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Snyk

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck vs Snyk

Compared 6% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Polyspace Code Prover

Download Polyspace Code Prover product report

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fugue

Overview

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

MathWorks

Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.

Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.

What are the key features of Snyk?

Easy Integration: Snyk integrates with CI/CD pipelines, GitHub, and JIRA for seamless security management.
Multilingual Support: It offers extensive programming language support, enhancing project compatibility.
Actionable Insights: Provides accurate vulnerability detection with actionable remediation guidance.
Cloud and Container Security: Offers comprehensive checks for cloud and container environments, improving security posture.
Automation & Notifications: Automates vulnerability alerts and notifications for early threat identification in development.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Time Efficiency: Speeds up development by identifying and fixing vulnerabilities early in the software lifecycle.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes security risks with extensive vulnerability scanning and proactive alerting.
Productivity Boost: Enhances productivity by integrating security directly into developers' workflows.
Improved Compliance: Aids in maintaining license compliance and managing open-source dependencies effectively.

Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.

Sample Customers

Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Polyspace Code Prover vs. Snyk