Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

PT Application Inspector vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

PT Application Inspector
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
46th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (15th)
SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of PT Application Inspector is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is 6.6%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Use PT Application Inspector?
Share your opinion
Archana Verma - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides valuable insights on code vulnerabilities and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines
I find SonarQube Cloud to be very user-friendly with an easy-to-use interface. It provides detailed code smell reports and insights on hotspots, which can later represent security vulnerabilities. It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives. It is integrated easily with the CI/CD pipeline, saving time and cost. It provides information on upcoming vulnerability details and loopholes that might turn into vulnerabilities.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SonarCloud?
Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonarCloud?
From what I understand, SonarQube Cloud is roughly equivalent in cost to Veracode, maybe a little cheaper.
What needs improvement with SonarCloud?
SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode. Additionally, it has fewer capabilities, which prompted us to use Veracode.
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Microsoft 2. Google 3. Amazon 4. IBM 5. Facebook 6. Apple 7. Intel 8. Cisco 9. Oracle 10. Adobe 11. Salesforce 12. SAP 13. Dell 14. HP 15. VMware 16. Accenture 17. Deloitte 18. PwC 19. Ernst & Young 20. KPMG 21. Infosys 22. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) 23. Wipro 24. Capgemini 25. Cognizant 26. HCL Technologies 27. Tech Mahindra 28. Fujitsu 29. NEC 30. Hitachi 31. Samsung 32. LG
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: April 2025.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.