Top 10 SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Alternatives

Vendor: Sonar

4.1 out of 5

14 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, Checkmarx One, and Veracode. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) surpasses its competitors by offering real-time code analysis, seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, and comprehensive security vulnerability detection, empowering developers to enhance code quality and maintain robust application performance effortlessly.

Sonar Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sonar, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

GitLab excels in CI/CD pipelines and integration flexibility, making it ideal for collaborative development and deployment. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud focuses on code quality and security, offering detailed analysis beneficial for maintaining high code standards and identifying vulnerabilities.

Download GitLab vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

GitLab's setup cost involves a straightforward pricing model with no initial fees, while SonarQube Cloud offers a subscription-based cost structure that may impact initial budgeting considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

GitLab's setup cost involves a straightforward pricing model with no initial fees, while SonarQube Cloud offers a subscription-based cost structure that may impact initial budgeting considerations.

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One

3.8 out of 5

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive vulnerability management with extensive language support and customization. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud focuses on continuous code analysis with efficient integration. Checkmarx is costly, while SonarQube is economical, appealing to tech buyers seeking specific security or cost priorities.

Download Checkmarx One vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

Checkmarx One offers straightforward setup with associated costs, while SonarQube Cloud presents a more cost-effective setup solution, highlighting clear differences in initial expenditure between the two security platforms.

View comparison

Pricing

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode offers comprehensive security analysis, ideal for robust vulnerability detection in diverse development environments. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud emphasizes essential code quality checks and provides a streamlined, cost-effective option for startups seeking code improvements with simpler integration and deployment.

Download SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode has substantial setup costs, while SonarQube Cloud offers a lower introductory price.

View comparison

Pricing

Veracode has substantial setup costs, while SonarQube Cloud offers a lower introductory price.

Coverity

3.9 out of 5

Coverity

3.9 out of 5

Coverity provides deep code scanning and security insights essential for complex environments, despite higher cost. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud offers cost-effective continuous analysis with seamless integration into workflows, benefiting startups and mid-sized companies seeking easier cloud deployment and increased code quality.

Download Coverity vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

Coverity has a higher setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more economical setup fee.

View comparison

Pricing

Coverity has a higher setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more economical setup fee.

OWASP Zap

3.8 out of 5

OWASP Zap

3.8 out of 5

OWASP Zap is an open-source tool offering cost-effective security testing, attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud, with cloud-based deployment, provides robust technical support and sophisticated code analytics, suited for those prioritizing consistent code review and seamless CI/CD integration.

Download OWASP Zap vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

OWASP Zap features no setup cost, attracting users with budget constraints, while SonarQube Cloud incorporates initial expenditures, offering advanced reporting capabilities as part of its setup.

View comparison

Pricing

OWASP Zap features no setup cost, attracting users with budget constraints, while SonarQube Cloud incorporates initial expenditures, offering advanced reporting capabilities as part of its setup.

Fortify on Demand

4.0 out of 5

Fortify on Demand

4.0 out of 5

Fortify on Demand offers comprehensive security features suitable for complex enterprise security needs. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud excels in continuous code analysis, making it ideal for startups and mid-sized organizations seeking effective integration with version control tools.

Download Fortify on Demand vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

Fortify on Demand has a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive features, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more economical setup, focusing on accessible scalability and integration.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortify on Demand has a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive features, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more economical setup, focusing on accessible scalability and integration.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

4.3 out of 5

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

4.3 out of 5

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional excels in penetration testing with flexibility for customization and real-time testing, benefiting those needing robust web vulnerability analysis. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud offers seamless CI/CD integration, appealing to teams prioritizing code quality and cloud-based deployment efficiency.

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional requires an upfront setup cost, contrasting with SonarQube Cloud's straightforward implementation approach. This highlights the differing initial financial commitments between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan offers comprehensive security scanning with strong capabilities in XSS and SQL injection prevention. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud excels in integration ease, offering efficient continuous code analysis and smooth CI/CD pipeline integration, making it ideal for startups and mid-sized companies.

Download HCL AppScan vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly onboarding process.

View comparison

Pricing

HCL AppScan has a higher initial setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly onboarding process.

Qualys Web Application Scanning

3.9 out of 5

Qualys Web Application Scanning

3.9 out of 5

Qualys excels in vulnerability management with comprehensive scanning features, ideal for CI/CD integration. In comparison, SonarQube enhances code quality through robust analysis and GitLab integration, appealing to developers. Qualys offers broad application coverage, whereas SonarQube focuses on development efficiency.

Download Qualys Web Application Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

Qualys Web Application Scanning has a straightforward setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more flexible pricing model, emphasizing their difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Qualys Web Application Scanning has a straightforward setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more flexible pricing model, emphasizing their difference in initial investment requirements.

Klocwork

4.0 out of 5

Klocwork

4.0 out of 5

Klocwork offers extensive security checks and customizability for enterprise needs. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud is known for real-time feedback and seamless cloud integration, making it attractive for agile projects. Klocwork's tailored features suit large enterprises, while SonarQube Cloud provides cost-efficient scalability.

Download Klocwork vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

Klocwork's setup cost is higher but includes enhanced customization options, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup with essential features.

View comparison

Pricing

Klocwork's setup cost is higher but includes enhanced customization options, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup with essential features.

Show 11 more products

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Application Security Tools

Build Automation