Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo

Top 10 SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Alternatives

Vendor: Sonar
4.1 out of 5
Post review

Top SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veracode, GitLab, and Checkmarx One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive code analysis, seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools, and an intuitive dashboard that enhances code quality and developer productivity, making it a preferred choice for cloud-based code quality management.

Sonar Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sonar, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Veracode
4.1 out of 5
Veracode excels with comprehensive security features, API integrations, and supports larger organizations with robust solutions. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud, while less feature-rich, offers affordability and ease of deployment, appealing to smaller businesses with a straightforward cloud-based model.
Download SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs. Veracode Report
Veracode has notable initial setup costs, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly pricing structure suitable for smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode has notable initial setup costs, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly pricing structure suitable for smaller teams.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
GitLab
4.3 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
GitLab
4.3 out of 5
GitLab excels in CI/CD pipeline management, tool integration, and collaborative features, ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud specializes in continuous code analysis and vulnerability detection, making it ideal for maintaining high code quality while integrating with version control systems.
Download GitLab vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
GitLab offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) presents a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses, reflecting their respective approaches to onboarding and infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
GitLab offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) presents a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses, reflecting their respective approaches to onboarding and infrastructure.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One excels in identifying security vulnerabilities directly in source code, providing comprehensive scanning features. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud focuses on continuous code analysis for improving code quality. Checkmarx One offers extensive environment flexibility, while SonarQube Cloud appeals to those seeking simpler deployment and affordability.
Download Checkmarx One vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Checkmarx One involves a significant initial setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost differences in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One involves a significant initial setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers a more economical setup, highlighting cost differences in initial investment between the two solutions.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Coverity
3.9 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Coverity
3.9 out of 5
Coverity offers strong security analysis, valuable for large codebases with compliance needs. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud focuses on continuous code analysis, suitable for startups with its cloud-based setup and cost-effective integration with version control tools, despite occasional false positives.
Download Coverity vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Coverity has a higher setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more economical setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Coverity has a higher setup cost compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more economical setup fee.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
OWASP Zap
3.8 out of 5
OWASP Zap offers powerful security testing and easy integration. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud excels in code quality analysis and multi-language support, making it ideal for maintaining code health. While OWASP Zap appeals cost-wise, SonarQube Cloud's comprehensive features provide long-term ROI.
Download OWASP Zap vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup, making it accessible, whereas SonarQube Cloud incurs a higher initial cost but provides robust cloud integration. The distinct pricing reflects their different approaches to accessibility and feature emphasis.
View comparison
Pricing
OWASP Zap offers a low-cost setup, making it accessible, whereas SonarQube Cloud incurs a higher initial cost but provides robust cloud integration. The distinct pricing reflects their different approaches to accessibility and feature emphasis.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Fortify on Demand
4.0 out of 5
Fortify on Demand provides robust security tools and detailed reports, ideal for diverse enterprises. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud emphasizes continuous code analysis and code quality metrics. Fortify enables flexibility with cloud/on-premises deployment, while SonarQube simplifies cloud-only setup with fewer integration resources.
Download Fortify on Demand vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Fortify on Demand has higher setup costs, making it less accessible for smaller teams, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly option with lower initial expenses, appealing to organizations with limited resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortify on Demand has higher setup costs, making it less accessible for smaller teams, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more budget-friendly option with lower initial expenses, appealing to organizations with limited resources.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
4.3 out of 5
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional targets in-depth web application penetration testing, offering tools like Proxy and Repeater for customization. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud excels in continuous code analysis, integrating seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines to track vulnerabilities throughout development.
Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional entails a straightforward setup cost, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers a reasonable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional entails a straightforward setup cost, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers a reasonable setup cost, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two solutions.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
HCL AppScan
3.9 out of 5
HCL AppScan attracts tech buyers seeking deep security analysis with flexible deployment. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud draws attention for its code quality metrics and easy integration into DevOps pipelines, appealing to those prioritizing code quality and efficient cloud-based operations.
Download HCL AppScan vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
HCL AppScan incurs a significant setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud requires less initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
HCL AppScan incurs a significant setup cost, while SonarQube Cloud requires less initial investment.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning
3.9 out of 5
Qualys Web Application Scanning offers robust scanning with integration capabilities ideal for those prioritizing security and comprehensive reporting. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud’s strength lies in continuous code analysis and early vulnerability detection, making it suitable for developers focused on maintaining code quality.
Download Qualys Web Application Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Qualys Web Application Scanning involves higher setup costs compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more cost-effective setup. While both solutions provide robust capabilities, the difference in initial expense is noteworthy for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys Web Application Scanning involves higher setup costs compared to SonarQube Cloud, which offers a more cost-effective setup. While both solutions provide robust capabilities, the difference in initial expense is noteworthy for potential users.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Invicti
4.1 out of 5
Invicti excels in vulnerability detection, offering cost-effective pricing with strong customer support. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud impresses with deep code quality analysis and extensive language support, ideal for seamless integration, though it may require a higher investment for comprehensive features.
Download Invicti vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Invicti has a transparent setup cost, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers tiered pricing, emphasizing distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Invicti has a transparent setup cost, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) offers tiered pricing, emphasizing distinct pricing strategies.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Kiuwan
4.3 out of 5
Kiuwan excels in security and deployment versatility, appealing to organizations needing on-premises solutions. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud offers seamless cloud integration, ideal for startups seeking robust code analysis. Kiuwan's cost-effective options benefit smaller projects, while SonarQube Cloud's fairness suits various project sizes.
Download Kiuwan vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comes with higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiuwan offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comes with higher setup expenses.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Rapid7 AppSpider
3.9 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Rapid7 AppSpider
3.9 out of 5
Rapid7 AppSpider delivers robust web application vulnerability scanning, valuable for security-focused teams. In comparison, SonarQube Cloud offers comprehensive static code analysis and seamless CI/CD integration, appealing to development teams prioritizing code quality and efficiency improvement.
Download Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
Rapid7 AppSpider entails a setup cost that reflects its premium positioning, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more accessible setup cost favoring budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 AppSpider entails a setup cost that reflects its premium positioning, while SonarQube Cloud offers a more accessible setup cost favoring budget-conscious users.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Semgrep
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Semgrep
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud simplifies deployment with a cloud-native architecture, integrating various languages for comprehensive code quality management. In comparison, Semgrep offers robust customization through pattern-based scanning, appealing to organizations prioritizing specific coding policies despite higher initial costs.
SonarQube Cloud features a streamlined setup with transparent pricing, while Semgrep requires a more flexible cost arrangement, highlighting a key difference in how each platform approaches onboarding costs for its users.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud features a streamlined setup with transparent pricing, while Semgrep requires a more flexible cost arrangement, highlighting a key difference in how each platform approaches onboarding costs for its users.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Cycode
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Cycode
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud enables streamlined CI/CD integration and cost-effective code quality assurance. In comparison, Cycode offers a comprehensive security-centric approach with advanced risk management features. Tech buyers might choose SonarQube Cloud for simplified deployment, while Cycode appeals with customizable security solutions.
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, minimizing implementation costs, while Cycode involves a more complex setup that may incur additional costs. This distinction highlights a crucial factor for potential users to consider when evaluating these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, minimizing implementation costs, while Cycode involves a more complex setup that may incur additional costs. This distinction highlights a crucial factor for potential users to consider when evaluating these security solutions.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
GitHub Code Scanning
4.8 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud's extensive plugin options make it ideal for varied coding environments. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning offers seamless integration with GitHub, simplifying setup. SonarQube Cloud provides flexible deployment, while GitHub Code Scanning is cost-effective within GitHub's ecosystem.
Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost, differing from GitHub Code Scanning, which incurs higher initial expenses. Users seeking a cost-effective setup may find SonarQube Cloud's pricing more appealing compared to GitHub's.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup cost, differing from GitHub Code Scanning, which incurs higher initial expenses. Users seeking a cost-effective setup may find SonarQube Cloud's pricing more appealing compared to GitHub's.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Synopsys API Security Testing
3.5 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud excels in continuous code inspection with competitive pricing, focusing on code quality and security. In comparison, Synopsys API Security Testing, priced at a premium, provides advanced API vulnerability analysis, appealing to those needing specialized protection for API interactions.
SonarQube Cloud offers an affordable setup cost, while Synopsys API Security Testing presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud offers an affordable setup cost, while Synopsys API Security Testing presents a higher initial investment, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
GuardRails
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
GuardRails
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud offers accessible deployment and strong CI/CD integration with extensive programming language support. In comparison, GuardRails provides comprehensive security scanning, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing security. SonarQube Cloud's cost-effective pricing suits smaller teams, while GuardRails justifies higher costs with superior security capabilities.
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup process with low initial costs, whereas GuardRails involves a higher setup cost but may offer more comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup process with low initial costs, whereas GuardRails involves a higher setup cost but may offer more comprehensive security features.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Logo
Aikido Security
1 out of 5
SonarQube Cloud offers competitive pricing and notable customer support with robust code analysis and easy integration. In comparison, Aikido Security provides advanced security features and proactive threat detection, appealing to security-sensitive environments despite a higher cost.
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Aikido Security provides customizable setup options but may involve higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Cloud offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Aikido Security provides customizable setup options but may involve higher expenses.

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Application Security Tools
Container Security