GitHub Code Scanning vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) comparison

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube Cloud (formerly S...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is 6.6%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Archana Verma

Security Analyst at Dover Corporation

Provides valuable insights on code vulnerabilities and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines

I find SonarQube Cloud to be very user-friendly with an easy-to-use interface. It provides detailed code smell reports and insights on hotspots, which can later represent security vulnerabilities. It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives. It is integrated easily with the CI/CD pipeline, saving time and cost. It provides information on upcoming vulnerability details and loopholes that might turn into vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The most valuable feature of SonarCloud is its overall performance."

"SonarCloud is overall a good tool for identifying code smells, bugs, and code duplication, but we've found that using Android Lint is more effective for our needs."

"The SaaS solution for checking code without execution and dealing with security issues is valuable."

"I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially."

"The reports from SonarCloud are very good."

"Its dashboard provides a unified view of various code quality metrics, including code duplication, unit test coverage, and security hotspots."

"The solution can be installed locally."

"Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) pros

Cons

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode. Additionally, it has fewer capabilities, which prompted us to use Veracode."

"It would be helpful if notifications could go out to an extra person."

"I've been told by the developers that the solution is too limited. It's not testing enough within the containers."

"SonarCloud's UI needs enhancement."

"The solution needs to improve its customization and flexibility."

"There's room for improvement in the configuration process, particularly during the initial setup phase."

"The UI can be improved. Additionally, in future updates, I would like to see SonarQube Cloud provide more detailed solutions for fixing code issues, especially solutions related to CVEs."

"SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode."

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"While not extremely cheap, it aligns well with market standards and offers good value."

"The price of SonarCloud is not expensive, it goes by the lines of code. 1 million lines per code are approximately 4,000 USD per year. If you need 2 million lines of code you would double the annual cost."

"The current pricing is quite cheap."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The price of SonarCloud could be less expensive. We are using the community version and the price should be more reasonable."

"I am using the free version of the solution."

"Previously, the pricing was 17,000 euros for five million lines analyzed. However, they now charge $15,000 per one million lines, significantly increasing the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may over...

What do you like most about SonarCloud?

Recently, they introduced support for mono reports and microservices, which is a noteworthy development as it provides a more detailed view of each service.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonarCloud?

From what I understand, SonarQube Cloud is roughly equivalent in cost to Veracode, maybe a little cheaper.

What needs improvement with SonarCloud?

SonarQube Cloud could improve its vulnerability detection compared to Veracode. Additionally, it has fewer capabilities, which prompted us to use Veracode.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Comparisons

Compared 33% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 31% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 66% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 7% of the time

GitLab vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 4% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 4% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

Download SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) product report

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

GitHub

Sonar

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.

SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.

What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?

Vulnerability Detection: Identifies potential security threats within code.
Security Hotspots: Highlights sections of the code that require closer inspection.
Feedback on Feature Branches: Enables early detection and resolution of quality issues.
No Maintenance: Ensures focus remains on development rather than tool upkeep.
Mono and Multi-Reports: Offers diverse insights into code quality.

What benefits should users look for?

Integration Ease: Seamlessly connects with popular development platforms.
Continuous Code Analysis: Provides consistent feedback to improve code standards.
Unified Quality View: Dashboard offers a comprehensive look at code metrics.
Security Insights: Detailed information on vulnerabilities and their impact.

In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.

Sonar

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)