GitHub Code Scanning vs OWASP Zap comparison

GitHub and OWASP are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.5, while OWASP is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.6. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to OWASP’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OWASP users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 2 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

534 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Read 39 OWASP Zap reviews

12,802 Views
6,625 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

OWASP Zap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

OWASP Zap and GitHub Code Scanning offer unique strengths in vulnerability management. GitHub Code Scanning appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities, while OWASP Zap is advantageous in pricing and support.

Features: OWASP Zap includes a wide range of security testing options, excellent customer support integration, and effective threat management tools. GitHub Code Scanning provides advanced automated scanning, seamless integration with DevOps tools, and superior code analysis.

Room for Improvement: OWASP Zap needs better reporting functionalities, improved integration with diverse DevOps tools, and enhanced performance for complex tasks. GitHub Code Scanning should enhance handling of large codebases, offer better customization of security rules, and improve user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OWASP Zap is recognized for straightforward installation and responsive customer service, making it a preferred choice for easy deployment. GitHub Code Scanning presents a steeper learning curve but compensates with consistent updates and quality service support.

Pricing and ROI: OWASP Zap is more cost-effective, ideal for budget-conscious organizations, providing quick ROI. While GitHub Code Scanning involves higher costs, the investment is justified by superior features and seamless integration that offer strong returns.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OWASP Zap is 5.0%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Amit Beniwal

Project Manager at Al Hassan LLC

Simplifies vulnerability discovery and has high quality support

There are areas for improvement with OWASP Zap, particularly in the alignment of vulnerabilities concerning CVSS scores. Sometimes, a vulnerability initially categorized as high severity may be reduced to medium or low over time after security patches are applied. This alignment with the present severity score and CVSS score could be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The interface is easy to use."

"OWASP is quite matured in identifying the vulnerabilities."

"The vulnerabilities that it finds, because the primary goal is to secure applications and websites."

"It updates repositories and libraries quickly."

"This solution has improved my organization because it has made us feel safer doing frequent deployments for web applications. If we have something really big, we might get some professional company in to help us but if we're releasing small products, we will check it ourselves with Zap. It makes it easier and safer."

"Simple and easy to learn and master."

"It has improved my organization with faster security tests."

"They offer free access to some other tools."

More OWASP Zap pros

Cons

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"The work that it does in the limited scope is good, but the scope is very limited in terms of the scanning features. The number of things it tests or finds is limited. They need to make it a more of a mainstream tool that people can use, and they can even think about having it on a proprietary basis. They need to increase the coverage of the scan and the results that it finds. That has always been Zap's limitation. Zap is a very good tool for a beginner, but once you start moving up the ladder where you want further details and you want your scan to show more in-depth results, Zap falls short because its coverage falls short. It does not have the capacity to do more."

"Zap could improve by providing better reports for security and recommendations for the vulnerabilities."

"The forced browse has been incorporated into the program and it is resource-intensive."

"There's very little documentation that comes with OWASP Zap."

"It would be ideal if I could try some pre-built deployment scenarios so that I don't have to worry about whether the configuration sector team is doing it right or wrong. That would be very helpful."

"The product reporting could be improved."

"The technical support team must be proactive."

"It would be nice to have a solid SQL injection engine built into Zap."

More OWASP Zap cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out."

"It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy."

"This solution is open source and free."

"We have used the freeware version. I believe Zap only has freeware."

"It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool."

"The tool is open-source."

"OWASP ZAP is a free tool provided by OWASP’s engineers and experts. There is an option to donate."

"This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about OWASP Zap?

The best feature is the Zap HUD (Heads Up Display) because the customers can use the website normally. If we scan websites with automatic scanning, and the website has a web application firewall, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

The tool is open source.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 30% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 28% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 19% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

HCL AppScan vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs OWASP Zap

Compared 22% of the time

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OWASP Zap

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OWASP Zap

Compared 9% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

February 2025

Download OWASP Zap product report

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap

January 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.