Top 10 GitHub Code Scanning Alternatives

4.7 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GitHub Code Scanning based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Veracode, and Coverity. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

GitHub Code Scanning surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration within development workflows, automated code review for vulnerabilities, and advanced security alerts, ensuring developers can efficiently manage code quality and security in a single, unified platform.

GitHub Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with GitHub, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

4.0 out of 5

SonarQube Server offers extensive language support and customizable analysis for flexibility. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning integrates seamlessly within GitHub for continuous code inspection. SonarQube's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, whereas GitHub Code Scanning's efficiency suits those valuing integrated workflows.

Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report

Pricing

SonarQube Server offers a competitive setup cost focused on flexibility, while GitHub Code Scanning is recognized for its straightforward implementation, highlighting a difference in initial investment and user approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode excels with detailed vulnerability reports and broad application coverage. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning offers seamless integration within GitHub. A tech buyer may choose Veracode for comprehensive security or GitHub for ease of workflow integration and competitive pricing.

Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode requires an upfront setup cost, while GitHub Code Scanning offers a more straightforward, lower-cost implementation process. Veracode’s pricing model may involve higher initial spending compared to the simpler cost structure of GitHub Code Scanning.

View comparison

Pricing

Coverity

3.9 out of 5

Coverity

3.9 out of 5

Coverity excels in defect detection and analysis capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive vulnerability assessment. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning integrates seamlessly with GitHub, perfect for continuous deployment environments prioritizing cost efficiency and streamlined workflows.

Download Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning Report

Pricing

Coverity requires a notable initial setup cost, while GitHub Code Scanning offers a more budget-friendly approach. This cost difference may influence the decision for businesses focused on minimizing setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

OWASP Zap

3.8 out of 5

OWASP Zap

3.8 out of 5

OWASP Zap provides effective vulnerability scanning with flexibility, appealing to users prioritizing budget-conscious open-source solutions. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning offers deep GitHub integration and extensive features, justifying its higher cost with seamless automation benefits for those seeking comprehensive CI/CD security.

Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. OWASP Zap Report

Pricing

OWASP Zap offers low setup costs, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users, while GitHub Code Scanning comes with a higher setup cost, reflecting its integration capabilities and comprehensive security features.

View comparison

Pricing

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

4.1 out of 5

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud)

4.1 out of 5

SonarQube Cloud excels with extensive language support and deep code quality analysis, ideal for diverse development settings. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning appeals through seamless GitHub integration and pre-commit scans, favoring environments prioritizing streamlined workflows and GitHub-centric operations.

Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) Report

Pricing

SonarQube Cloud has a straightforward initial setup, while GitHub Code Scanning involves more complex setup procedures. This highlights GitHub Code Scanning’s potential need for more resources during implementation compared to SonarQube Cloud.

View comparison

Pricing

Acunetix

3.9 out of 5

Acunetix

3.9 out of 5

Acunetix attracts buyers with robust vulnerability detection and clear ROI. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning appeals with advanced features and seamless GitHub integration, justifying its higher cost. Acunetix suits those valuing effective support, while GitHub Code Scanning benefits users needing comprehensive code analysis.

Download Acunetix vs. GitHub Code Scanning Report

Pricing

Acunetix incurs higher setup costs compared to GitHub Code Scanning, which offers a more economical initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Acunetix incurs higher setup costs compared to GitHub Code Scanning, which offers a more economical initial deployment.

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan

3.9 out of 5

HCL AppScan offers comprehensive vulnerability detection and automated testing, making it attractive for enterprises seeking extensive security scanning. In comparison, GitHub Code Scanning integrates seamlessly into GitHub workflows, appealing to those valuing real-time analysis and strong collaborative features within existing GitHub environments.

Download GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan Report

Pricing

HCL AppScan involves a more substantial setup cost, while GitHub Code Scanning is more economical in terms of initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

HCL AppScan involves a more substantial setup cost, while GitHub Code Scanning is more economical in terms of initial investment.

Aikido Security

1 out of 5

Aikido Security

1 out of 5

Aikido Security enhances security management with advanced analytics and threat detection. Valuable features include real-time insights and comprehensive reporting. Users appreciate efficient data handling but identify room for improvement in integration capabilities. Aikido Security addresses critical vulnerabilities effectively, aligning with enterprise needs.

View comparison

Related categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Application Security Tools

Software Development Analytics