GitHub Code Scanning vs HCL AppScan comparison

GitHub and HCLSoftware are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.5, while HCLSoftware is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 0.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to HCLSoftware ’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of HCLSoftware users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 2 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

406 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Read 42 HCL AppScan reviews

4,695 Views
3,595 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

HCL AppScan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

```html

HCL AppScan and GitHub Code Scanning compete in security scanning software. GitHub Code Scanning is preferred for integration features, while HCL AppScan wins on pricing and support.

Features: HCL AppScan offers robust scanning capabilities, comprehensive policy configuration, and great pricing. GitHub Code Scanning is known for deep integration with GitHub workflows, actionable insights, and adaptability within development pipelines.

Room for Improvement: HCL AppScan could enhance integration flexibility, user experience, and database reach. GitHub Code Scanning could benefit from comprehensive vulnerability databases, better reporting features, and improved support response.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HCL AppScan is praised for reliable customer support but has an intricate deployment process. GitHub Code Scanning simplifies setup with smooth GitHub integration and offers ease of deployment, but with mixed reviews on support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: HCL AppScan is valued for affordability and strong ROI from scanning capabilities relative to cost. GitHub Code Scanning involves higher setup costs but demonstrates good ROI through enhanced integration and streamlined development processes.

```

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

22nd

Average Rating

9.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (13th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.8%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

May 28, 2024

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Gladwin Christian

QA manager at SmartStream Technologies ltd.

Sep 29, 2023

A useful tool to scan applications that can be easily installed

Given that we have been using HCL AppScan for many years, I think the setup process is not difficult at all. Sometimes, some issues stop or prevent my company from moving forward with the product's setup phase. We have to call HCL's support team and engage in long discussions to smoothly carry out the setup phase. In general, the product's setup phase is not difficult in our company. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The licenses for the solution are available only on cloud deployments nowadays. The solution is already installed in our environment. Every time a new release or software comes out from HCL, our company does a scan, which takes maybe a day or two.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"I like the recording feature."

"The reporting part is the most valuable feature."

"The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL."

"The product is useful, particularly in its sensitivity and scanning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is scanning QR codes."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman."

"The platform has valuable security features, helping us identify sensitive code issues and the possibility of internal applications' exposure to external threats."

"Technical support is helpful."

More HCL AppScan pros

Cons

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"There are so many lines of code with so many different categories that I am likely to get lost. "

"Sometimes it doesn't work so well."

"They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities."

"We would like to integrate with some of the other reporting tools that we're planning to use in the future."

"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."

"The solution could improve by having a mobile version."

"We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated."

"The solution needs to improve in some areas. The tool needs to add more languages. It also needs to improve its speed."

More HCL AppScan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."

"HCL AppScan is expensive."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"The product is moderately priced, though it's an investment due to extensive code analysis needs."

"The solution is moderately priced."

"AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates.

See all answers

What do you like most about HCL AppScan?

The most valuable feature of HCL AppScan is its integration with the SDLC, particularly during the coding phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

We use AppScan primarily for security testing and performance monitoring across our systems.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 30% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 26% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 25% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Acunetix vs HCL AppScan

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs HCL AppScan

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs HCL AppScan

Compared 9% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 8% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2024

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

November 2024

Download HCL AppScan product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

Learn More

GitHub

HCLSoftware

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan

October 2024

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. HCL AppScan report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.