Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning comparison

Black Duck and GitHub are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9, while GitHub is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.5. Black Duck holds a 8.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitHub’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 41 Coverity reviews

14,372 Views
9,729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 2 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

406 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coverity

GitHub Code Scanning

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Coverity and GitHub Code Scanning are competitors in the code quality analysis category. GitHub Code Scanning holds an upper hand due to its seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, which users favor for complex project setups.

Features: Coverity offers comprehensive code analysis, static analysis capabilities, and detailed reporting features. GitHub Code Scanning provides strong CI/CD integration, seamless usability within GitHub, and ease of integration with existing projects.

Room for Improvement: Coverity could enhance integration with modern CI/CD platforms, streamline its complex deployment process, and update its integration capabilities. GitHub Code Scanning could improve the depth of analysis, offer more extensive customer support, and bolster its analytic strength further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coverity deployment is complex, but customer service is highly rated. GitHub Code Scanning provides a smoother deployment process within GitHub projects and a more user-friendly environment despite less extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Coverity pricing is high but justified by in-depth analysis and effective support, offering solid ROI. GitHub Code Scanning is more cost-effective with moderate long-term ROI due to seamless integration with GitHub workflows, attracting budget-conscious users despite Coverity's higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

22nd

Average Rating

9.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 8.4%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Cyber Security Chartered Engineer at Banglalink

May 3, 2024

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

May 28, 2024

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool as it is can be used for code quality improvement."

"This solution is easy to use."

"The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution."

"The interface of Coverity is quite good, and it is also easy to use."

"One of the most valuable features is Contributing Events. That particular feature helps the developer understand the root cause of a defect. So you can locate the starting point of the defect and figure out exactly how it is being exploited."

"Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime."

"What I find most effective about Coverity is its low rate of false positives. I've seen other platforms with many false positives, but with Coverity, most vulnerabilities it identifies are genuine. This allows me to focus on real issues."

"The product has deeper scanning capabilities."

More Coverity pros

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

Cons

"Ideally, it would have a user-based license that does not have a restriction in the number of lines of code."

"The solution's user interface and quality gate could be improved."

"We actually specified several checkers, but we found some checkers had a higher false positive rate. I think this is a problem. Because we have to waste some time is really the issue because the issue is not an issue. I mean, the tool pauses or an issue, but the same issue is the filter now.Some check checkers cannot find some issues, but sometimes they find issues that are not relevant, right, that are not really issues. Some customisation mechanism can be added in the next release so that we can define our Checker. The Modelling feature provided by Coverity helps in finding more information for potential issues but it is not mature enough, it should be mature. The fast testing feature for security testing campaign can be added as well. So if you correctly integrate it with the training team, maybe you can help us to find more potential issues."

"It would be great if we could customize the rules to focus on critical issues."

"The setup takes very long."

"Coverity is far from perfection, and I'm not 100 percent sure it's helping me find what I need to find in my role. We need exactly what we are looking for, i.e. security errors and vulnerabilities. It doesn't seem to be reporting while we are changing our code."

"SCM integration is very poor in Coverity."

"They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier."

More Coverity cons

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"Depending on the usage types, one has to opt for different types of licenses from Coverity, especially to be able to use areas like report viewing or report generation."

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"The tool was fairly priced."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Insurance Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

We do it yearly.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 54% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Coverity

Compared 1% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 30% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 25% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

November 2024

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2024

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

No data available

Learn More

Black Duck

GitHub

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

October 2024

Free Report: Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.