Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning comparison

Black Duck and GitHub are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Black Duck is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while GitHub is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.5. Black Duck holds a 7.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to GitHub’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Coverity

Read 42 Coverity reviews

12,653 Views
8,729 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 2 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

534 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coverity

GitHub Code Scanning

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Coverity and GitHub Code Scanning are competitors in the code quality analysis category. GitHub Code Scanning holds an upper hand due to its seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, which users favor for complex project setups.

Features: Coverity offers comprehensive code analysis, static analysis capabilities, and detailed reporting features. GitHub Code Scanning provides strong CI/CD integration, seamless usability within GitHub, and ease of integration with existing projects.

Room for Improvement: Coverity could enhance integration with modern CI/CD platforms, streamline its complex deployment process, and update its integration capabilities. GitHub Code Scanning could improve the depth of analysis, offer more extensive customer support, and bolster its analytic strength further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coverity deployment is complex, but customer service is highly rated. GitHub Code Scanning provides a smoother deployment process within GitHub projects and a more user-friendly environment despite less extensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Coverity pricing is high but justified by in-depth analysis and effective support, offering solid ROI. GitHub Code Scanning is more cost-effective with moderate long-term ROI due to seamless integration with GitHub workflows, attracting budget-conscious users despite Coverity's higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

20th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 7.8%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coverity integrates with issue-tracking systems like Jira and provides email notifications, alerts, and other features."

"It provides reports about a lot of potential defects."

"What I find most effective about Coverity is its low rate of false positives. I've seen other platforms with many false positives, but with Coverity, most vulnerabilities it identifies are genuine. This allows me to focus on real issues."

"It's pretty stable. I rate the stability of Coverity nine out of ten."

"Coverity is easy to use and easy to integrate with CI."

"It has the lowest false positives."

"The ability to scan code gives us details of existing and potential vulnerabilities. What really matters for us is to ensure that we are able to catch vulnerabilities ahead of time."

"It help us identify the latest security vulnerabilities."

More Coverity pros

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

Cons

"The solution's user interface and quality gate could be improved."

"Sometimes it's a bit hard to figure out how to use the product’s UI."

"Reporting engine needs to be more robust."

"Right now, the Coverity executable is around 1.2GB to download. If they can reduce it to approximately 600 or 700MB, that would be great. If they decrease the executable, it will be much easier to work in an environment like Docker."

"The product could be enhanced by providing video troubleshooting guides, making issue resolution more accessible. Troubleshooting without visual guides can be time-consuming."

"Coverity takes a lot of time to dereference null pointers."

"The solution could use more rules."

"There is an extra step in my organization that involves uploading to servers, which adds overhead."

More Coverity cons

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Coverity’s price is on the higher side. It should be lower."

"I would rate Coverity's pricing as a nine out of ten. It's already very expensive, and it's a problem for us to get more licenses due to the price. The pricing model has some good aspects - for example, a personal license gives access to all languages without code limitations, which is better than some competitors. However, it's still a lot of money for us to spend."

"The price is competitive with other solutions."

"Coverity is quite expensive."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"The solution is affordable."

"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Compared 51% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Coverity

Compared 2% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 30% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 19% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 4% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coverity

February 2025

Download Coverity product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

No data available

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

January 2025

Free Report: Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coverity vs. GitHub Code Scanning report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.