PubSub+ Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Solace and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Solace is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Red Hat is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Solace holds a 5.9% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solace users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

PubSub+ Platform

Read 19 PubSub+ Platform reviews

3,670 Views
1,064 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,142 Views
1,607 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PubSub+ Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Red Hat AMQ and PubSub+ Platform compete in the realm of message-oriented middleware. PubSub+ Platform has the upper hand due to its superior scalability and cloud-native features, making it a robust choice for diverse deployment environments.

Features: Red Hat AMQ provides seamless integration within the Red Hat environment, enhanced security, and a variety of connectors for different systems. PubSub+ Platform offers extensive event-streaming capabilities, multi-cloud support, and advanced telemetry features. Its ability to handle complex IoT solutions offers a versatile messaging backbone.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat AMQ could improve its scalability and support for cloud-native applications. There is potential to enhance its event-streaming capabilities and telemetry features. PubSub+ Platform might benefit from pricing adjustments to improve attractiveness for smaller enterprises. Enhancements in integration with non-cloud-native environments and cost optimization strategies could also be considered.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat AMQ offers a straightforward deployment model suitable for organizations using Red Hat's suite, with robust customer support and documentation. PubSub+ Platform provides a faster, more flexible deployment process, particularly in hybrid cloud architectures, and is noted for responsive and in-depth customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat AMQ is appealing for its competitive pricing and lower initial setup costs, attractive for small to medium enterprises. In contrast, PubSub+ Platform, despite its higher price, is seen as delivering a higher ROI due to its comprehensive feature set and scalability, benefiting larger enterprises looking for advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,868 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PubSub+ Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (2nd), Event Monitoring (11th), Streaming Analytics (15th)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of PubSub+ Platform is 5.9%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 6.8%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat AMQ	6.8%
PubSub+ Platform	5.9%
Other	87.3%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Deepankar Bbhowmick

Integration Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Messaging design has become visual and reliable and now supports fast microservice communication

The unique functions I appreciate about PubSub+ Platform are that it allows me to design my solution in a graphical manner, which is not available in many other products, and the design can also be pushed to the actual infrastructure layer, making it quite advantageous. Mesh technology is useful in scenarios where different geographies have to be connected, although such situations are not commonly found. It is beneficial but not a super-used feature of PubSub+ Platform. The event replay function is quite mature in PubSub+ Platform, allowing me to replay messages that are days in the past, which is a good feature. The main benefits PubSub+ Platform provides for the end-user include building a robust and scalable system with very low network latency, which improves the customer experience, whether using mobile phones or applications. This type of messaging framework is extremely important, and Solace is a very good product in that space. Nowadays, most applications are built using microservices technology, with small microservices interchanging messages via PubSub+ Platform. Without it, realizing a scalable system would not be possible; for example, one cannot have Netflix or similar services that require quick data transit and a good user experience, ensuring that data cannot be lost in transit. The analytics part of PubSub+ Platform is quite useful as it can connect with many analytical software tools, mainly for analysis of system logs, such as Splunk, DataDog, or Prometheus. It has the flexibility to connect with any of these and supports OpenTelemetry, which is not available in many other products, making traceability very easy. I can see how a message travels from a source system to the target system, end-to-end, along with what happens to that message along the path, making the analytics quite good.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen at least a 50 percent increase in productivity (compared to using Kafka) when using Solace for sharing changes in real-time, onboarding new subscribers, and modifying data sets."

"The most useful features has been the WAN optimization and probably the HybridEdge, which requires some third-party adapters or plugins. The idea that we can position Solace as a protocol-agnostic message transport fabric is key to our company having all manners of asynchronous messaging protocols from MQ, Kafka, JMS, etc. I really like the WAN optimization: Send once over a WAN, then distribute locally as many times as there are subscribers."

"The way we can replicate information and send it to several subscribers is most valuable."

"As of now, the most valuable aspects are the topic-based subscription and the fanout exchange that we are using."

"From my pursuit of the secret sauce, I found that Solace really is, for us, the service and the partnership that we have with the company, having the level of expertise and the subject matter knowledge available to us is second to none."

"Some valuable features include reconnecting topics, placing queues, and direct connections to MongoDB. The platform provides a dashboard to monitor the status of messages, such as how many have been processed or delivered, which is helpful for tracking performance."

"This solution reduces the latency to access changes in real-time and the effort required to onboard a new subscriber. It also reduces the maintenance of each of those interfaces because now the publisher and subscribers are decoupled. Event Broker handles all the communication and engagement. We can just push one update, then we don't have to know who is consuming it and what's happening to that publication downstream. It's all done by the broker, which is a huge benefit of using Event Broker."

More PubSub+ Platform pros

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The self-service aspect is very important for us, and AMQ Streams has enabled us to deliver new services faster, going from days to hours."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"From the functionality perspective, 3scale provides a very comparable, if not the same feature set as any leader in the market for API management and the gateway perspective, but with a fraction of the price."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"I would like them to design topic and queue schemas, mapping them to the enterprise data structure."

"Some improvement is required with Solace professional services. The professional services really needs to drive the solutions for the customers and share best practices."

"The product should allow third-party agents to be installed."

"The licensing and the cost are the major pitfalls."

"We have requested to be able to get into the payload to do dynamic topic hierarchy building."

"One of the areas of improvement would be if we could tell the story a bit better about what an event mesh does or why an event mesh is foundational to a large enterprise that has a wide diversity of applications that are homegrown and a small number off the shelf."

"The deployment process is complex."

"We've pointed out some things with the DMR piece, the event mesh, in edge cases where we could see a problem. Something like 99 percent of users wouldn't ever see this problem, but it has to do with if you get multiple bad clients sending data over a WAN, for example. That could then impact other clients."

More PubSub+ Platform cons

"This solution is completely unstable. We lose messages."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Having a free version of the solution was a big, important part of our decision to go with it. This was the big driver for us to evaluate Solace. We started using it as the free version. When we felt comfortable with the free version, that is when we bought the enterprise version."

"Having a free version is critical for our technology operations use case. This is primarily because our technology operations team is a cost center in our company. They are not profit drivers and having a free version for installation will probably meet our needs. Even for production, it'll support up to a 100,000 messages per second. I don't think in technology operations that we have that many events and alerts from our detection tools. Even if I have 20 or 30 event detection products out there, they're only going to publish the things which are critical or warnings. I don't think we'll ever reach a 100,000 messages per second."

"I would rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten."

"We are looking for something that will add value and fit for purpose. Freeware is good if you want to try something quickly without putting in much money. However, as far as our decision is concerned, I don't think it helps. At the end of the day, if we are convinced that a capability is required, we will ask for the funding. Then, when the funding is available, we will go for an enterprise solution only."

"The price of PubSub+ Event Broker is reasonable for the capability it offers. However, when compared to others solutions on the market it is expensive."

"It could be cheaper. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"We have been really happy with the product licensing rates. It has been free for us, up to a 100,000 transactions per second, and all we have to do is pay for support. Making their product available and accessible to us has not been a problem at all."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

More PubSub+ Platform pricing and cost advice

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The solution is open-source."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PubSub+ Event Broker?

Pricing-wise for PubSub+ Platform, I find it a little expensive, so I would rate it at six.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PubSub+ Event Broker?

Potential areas for improvement in PubSub+ Platform are its authentication mechanisms, which could be slightly better. While simple authentication using basic methods is easy, moving to more robust...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PubSub+ Event Broker?

PubSub+ Platform is primarily used for guaranteed delivery of messages from across systems, for microservice-based development, and for high-speed data consumption purposes. Guaranteed transmission...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Kafka vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 9% of the time

IBM MQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Confluent vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Software AG Universal Messaging vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More PubSub+ Platform Competitors

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 25% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 20% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform

April 2026

Download PubSub+ Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

April 2026

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

PubSub+ Event Broker, PubSub+ Event Portal

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

PubSub+ Platform is designed for real-time message publishing and outstanding interoperability. With features like intuitive administration and topic filtering, it offers both stability and high performance for scalable deployments across diverse scenarios.

PubSub+ Platform enhances data integration with its event mesh and seamless protocol compatibility, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations tracking shipments, generating reports, and managing transactions. Its granular topic filtering and WAN optimization ensure high utility in event-driven applications and cloud deployments. Users highlight the platform's intuitive administration and ease of management, though some seek improved integration with third-party tools and enhanced observability. Concerns include scalability for large payloads and training resource availability. Despite its interface complexity, PubSub+ remains valuable for trading and market data distribution.

What are the key features of PubSub+ Platform?

Real-time messaging: Facilitates seamless communication across platforms.
Flexible topic hierarchy: Supports dynamic topic taxonomy for efficient data management.
Event mesh: Enhances integration and interoperability with diverse protocols.
Intuitive administration: Simplifies system management and configuration.
WAN optimization: Ensures efficient connectivity for global deployment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Messaging stability: Offers consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Scalability: Provides seamless expansion to accommodate growing data volumes.
Security: Maintains robust protection for sensitive information.
Support and configuration: Accessible, reliable support, and UI-driven setup streamline the management.

PubSub+ Platform is widely implemented for asynchronous messaging in industries like finance for trading and market data, logistics for shipment tracking, and tech operations management. It enables companies to modernize applications while ensuring data accuracy and efficiency across global systems.

Solace

Red Hat AMQ provides robust performance with high scalability and security, supporting efficient message processing and various protocols. It integrates with OpenShift and Apache Kafka, making it ideal for event-driven microservices in hybrid environments.

Red Hat AMQ is designed for asynchronous messaging, data synchronization, and real-time notifications. Its strengths include high availability, fault tolerance, and operator-based automation. The lightweight, scalable design enables straightforward management, combined with reliable official support. Integration with ActiveMQ ensures stable and independent installation. Users can also employ connectors and routing on Kubernetes, enhancing its utility for sectors like banking and logistics.

What are the most valuable features of Red Hat AMQ?

Compatibility with OpenShift, facilitating seamless integration
Operator-based automation for streamlined processes
High availability and fault tolerance for continuous operations
Vault-based security ensuring data protection
Scalability and lightweight design for efficient resource use
Support for multiple protocols enhancing flexibility

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat AMQ?

Scalability for growing business demands
Ease of configuration reducing setup time
Robust performance delivering reliable message processing
Cost advantages offering economic benefits over competitors
Stability from independent installation ensuring resilience

Industries use Red Hat AMQ for asynchronous application messaging, enhancing communication in Master System Integration projects. Sectors like banking utilize it for real-time alerts, while logistics companies leverage it for notifications. Its support for connectors and routing within OpenShift benefits organizations with complex data flow requirements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

FxPro, TP ICAP, Barclays, Airtel, American Express, Cobalt, Legal & General, LSE Group, Akuna Capital, Azure Information Technology, Brand.net, Canadian Securities Exchange, Core Transport Technologies, Crédit Agricole, Fluent Trade Technologies, Harris Corporation, Korea Exchange, Live E!, Mercuria Energy, Myspace, NYSE Technologies, Pico, RBC Capital Markets, Standard Chartered Bank, Unibet

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

April 2026

Free Report: PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PubSub+ Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.