Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate comparison

Qlik Compose and Qlik Replicate are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik Compose is ranked #50, while Qlik Replicate is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Qlik Compose holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik Replicate’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik Compose users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik Replicate users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,138 Views
1,817 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

4,573 Views
3,430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Replicate and Qlik Compose are data integration technologies competing in the data management sector. Qlik Replicate appears to have the upper hand due to its real-time data replication abilities and ease of integration across various platforms without affecting the source system's performance.

Features: Qlik Replicate is valued for its real-time change data capture capabilities, diverse data management tasks, and user-friendly configuration. It can replicate data without impacting source databases and handles logs to capture changes efficiently. Qlik Compose excels in automating data modernization, data modeling, and ETL processes, and it can auto-generate data warehouse coding and develop functional warehouses quickly. Its automation capabilities allow for quick development and management of data warehouses.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Replicate users seek better pricing strategies, quicker technical support response times, and more detailed error messages when dealing with multiple data destinations. Qlik Compose could improve its monitoring, scheduling capabilities, and user support, while users desire easier configuration and efficient processing of larger data volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Replicate offers versatile deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds but could benefit from faster support response. Qlik Compose is typically used in on-premises settings, where localized support is preferred over Qlik’s centralized system. Improvements in customer support are needed across both solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Replicate is a premium solution with pricing based on data cores. It offers significant ROI through improved data management and reduced database usage. Qlik Compose pricing varies by data volume and scale, but its transparency is often questioned. Both products are seen as delivering cost savings through process automation and efficient data management.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

50th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Replicate

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Replicate is 1.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Replicate	1.4%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Shraddha Waghulde

Solution Architect at Predoole Analytics

Real-time data synchronization faces challenges with monitoring and affordability

The user-friendly interface in Qlik Replicate simplifies configuration and management of replication tasks because it is based on GUI, and users don't have to write any scripts. It is entirely drag and drop functionality. Even with zero knowledge of scripting, users can effectively use Qlik Replicate. The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature. As soon as data is entered into the source, it gets captured at target locations. This occurs in near real-time, with replication happening within seconds at the target location. Additionally, whatever operations are performed at the source, whether adding data, deleting data, or updating anything, it gets replicated at target locations. It functions as data injection from source to target, ensuring all operations performed on the source system are replicated on target systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"It's a stable solution."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"Qlik Compose is good enough; it is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

More Qlik Compose pros

"Support has been great."

"Great with replicating and updating records."

"The most useful functions of Qlik Replicate are the data manipulation to transformations."

"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product."

"It implements new real-time capabilities for data ingestion, works in hybrid mode that is a hybrid cloud, is very good, and it looks like it has very good performance, so we're quite happy."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Support for this product could be better. When we do, my rating is a two out of five, because their internal support is not great."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"When you remote into it the Qlik Replicate UI a lot of times it just freezes. We set up the EC2, to allow them to go to the server and click on the Replicate icon, it just opens up and just sits there. At that point, we have to go into the EC2 and then reboot the server. This should be fixed, it is frustrating."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

In terms of handling diverse data sources, Qlik Replicate does exhibit certain shortcomings.Other areas of Qlik Replicate that could be improved include its ability to serve as a single point tool,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My usual use cases for Qlik Replicate involve my previous organization and my current organization. I can provide my current experience. As an Australian energy provider, we have a lot of operation...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Qlik Replicate?

The usefulness of the self-service interface of Qlik Replicate lies in its ability for users to independently access fresh data from the data lake or downstream SQL systems or ODS systems without n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

SharePlex vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Replication Server vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

May 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

May 2026

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Qlik Replicate offers log-based change data capture, supporting real-time data updates without affecting source databases. It manages schema changes automatically and ensures seamless data distribution. The platform is user-friendly, enables late-stage transformation, and supports incremental replication and real-time analytics.

Qlik Replicate is known for efficiently capturing data changes with minimal impact on source databases. Its log-based change data capture capabilities ensure quick propagation of updates in real-time while automatically handling schema changes, facilitating ease in data management. The system's seamless integration across endpoints and a user-friendly interface make it an invaluable tool for incremental replication and real-time analytics. Despite some challenges like UI freezing, complex licensing, and error handling, it is instrumental in enhancing business growth and operational efficiency. Users continuously seek improvements in error insights, data compression, and expanded API integration to better serve diverse data sources and platforms.

What are the key features of Qlik Replicate?

Log-Based Change Data Capture: Captures data changes in real-time without heavy loads.
Automatic Schema Handling: Manages schema changes seamlessly.
Platform Integration: Integrates well with platforms like AWS and Snowflake.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers a simple and intuitive interface.
Real-Time Analytics: Enables immediate data insights for business growth.

What benefits should users expect from Qlik Replicate?

Improved Data Accessibility: Enhances access to data for decision-making.
Automation in Data Modeling: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time.
Efficient Change Data Capture: Reduces downtime and increases efficiency.
Streamlined Data Pipelines: Facilitates smoother data transfers.

Qlik Replicate is used across industries such as energy, banking, and semiconductors to modernize analytics environments and streamline data flows. It excels in data migration from systems like SAP HANA and Oracle to environments like AWS, significantly reducing downtime and boosting analytics capabilities. Organizations report advantages such as enhanced data accessibility and automated data modeling, which facilitates efficient change data capture and operational effectiveness.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

May 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. Qlik Replicate report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.