Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose comparison

Microsoft and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Qlik is ranked #49. Microsoft holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 96 Azure Data Factory reviews

12,975 Views
9,083 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,319 Views
1,948 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and Azure Data Factory are both powerful tools in the category of data integration and transformation. Despite Qlik Compose's appealing pricing and support, Azure Data Factory often emerges as the preferred choice due to its robust features and superior scalability.

Features: Qlik Compose offers data warehouse automation, change data capture, and lifecycle management, enabling accelerated deployment of analytics-ready data. Azure Data Factory shines with its extensive data orchestration and transformation tools, seamless integration with various cloud services, and over 100 out-of-the-box connectors supporting diverse data sources. It is also recognized for its flexibility and the ability to handle complex data flows, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its real-time processing capabilities and expand its cloud integration options to better compete with Azure's flexibility. Additionally, improved scalability features could help it cater to more extensive and complex deployments. On the other hand, Azure Data Factory users desire improvements in interface speed and more advanced monitoring features. Some users also find that its pricing model can become costly, possibly limiting its appeal for smaller companies with budget constraints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose's deployment is user-friendly with a focus on model-driven pipelines, beneficial for teams with limited technical expertise. It is also noted for its reliable support system. Azure Data Factory, offering detailed documentation and community support, suits intricate deployments across diverse environments. While its setup may be complex, these resources aid in troubleshooting and ensure a smooth deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose is praised for its straightforward and cost-effective pricing, aligning with its automated functionality. Azure Data Factory, though perceived as more expensive due to its extensive capabilities, is considered worth the investment for those needing advanced and scalable solutions, offering significant ROI for enterprises with comprehensive data strategy requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (5th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 2.3%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Data Factory	2.3%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	96.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

KandaswamyMuthukrishnan

Director at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Integrates diverse data sources and streamlines ETL processes effectively

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Azure Data Factory, there is a need for better data transformation, especially since many people are now depending on DataBricks more for connectivity and data integration. Azure Data Factory should consider how to enhance integration or filtering for more transformations, such as integrating with Spark clusters. I am satisfied with Azure Data Factory so far, but I suggest integrating some AI functionality to analyze data during the transition itself, providing insights such as null records, common records, and duplicates without running a separate pipeline or job. The monitoring tools in Azure Data Factory are helpful for optimizing data pipelines; while the current feature is adequate, they can improve by creating a live dashboard to see the online process, including how much percentage has been completed, which will be very helpful for people who are monitoring the pipeline.

Read full review

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data is more scalable."

"The user interface is very good. It makes me feel very comfortable when I am using the tool."

"I like Azure Data Factory, it works quite well."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it allows more data between on-premises and cloud solutions."

"Data Factory's best features include its data source connections, GUI for building data pipelines, and target loading within Azure."

"The most important feature is that it can help you do the multi-threading concepts."

"The data factory agent is quite good and programming or defining the value of jobs, processes, and activities is easy."

"I think it makes it very easy to understand what data flow is and so on. You can leverage the user interface to do the different data flows, and it's great. I like it a lot."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It can scale."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It's a stable solution."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"The need to work more on developing out-of-the-box connectors for other products like Oracle, AWS, and others."

"Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."

"Real-time replication is required, and this is not a simple task."

"For some of the data, there were some issues with data mapping. Some of the error messages were a little bit foggy. There could be more of a quick start guide or some inline examples. The documentation could be better."

"The number of standard adaptors could be extended further."

"Azure Data Factory should be cheaper to move data to a data center abroad for calamities in case of disasters."

"I would like to see this time travel feature in Snowflake added to Azure Data Factory."

"Some of the optimization techniques are not scalable."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is pay-as-you-go or reserve instance. Of the two options, reserve instance is much cheaper."

"It seems very low initially, but as the data grows, the solution’s bills grow exponentially."

"The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."

"Data Factory is affordable."

"I am aware of the pricing of Azure Data Factory, but I prefer not to disclose specific details."

"There's no licensing for Azure Data Factory, they have a consumption payment model. How often you are running the service and how long that service takes to run. The price can be approximately $500 to $1,000 per month but depends on the scaling."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"For our use case, it is not expensive. We take into the picture everything: resources, learning curve, and maintenance."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	63

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Databricks vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

May 2026

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

May 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

Microsoft

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

April 2026

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.