Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose comparison

Microsoft and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9, while Qlik is ranked #52. Microsoft holds a 2.3% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 97 Azure Data Factory reviews

14,099 Views
9,728 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,621 Views
2,123 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Qlik Compose and Azure Data Factory are both powerful tools in the category of data integration and transformation. Despite Qlik Compose's appealing pricing and support, Azure Data Factory often emerges as the preferred choice due to its robust features and superior scalability.

Features: Qlik Compose offers data warehouse automation, change data capture, and lifecycle management, enabling accelerated deployment of analytics-ready data. Azure Data Factory shines with its extensive data orchestration and transformation tools, seamless integration with various cloud services, and over 100 out-of-the-box connectors supporting diverse data sources. It is also recognized for its flexibility and the ability to handle complex data flows, making it ideal for large-scale enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Compose could enhance its real-time processing capabilities and expand its cloud integration options to better compete with Azure's flexibility. Additionally, improved scalability features could help it cater to more extensive and complex deployments. On the other hand, Azure Data Factory users desire improvements in interface speed and more advanced monitoring features. Some users also find that its pricing model can become costly, possibly limiting its appeal for smaller companies with budget constraints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose's deployment is user-friendly with a focus on model-driven pipelines, beneficial for teams with limited technical expertise. It is also noted for its reliable support system. Azure Data Factory, offering detailed documentation and community support, suits intricate deployments across diverse environments. While its setup may be complex, these resources aid in troubleshooting and ensure a smooth deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Compose is praised for its straightforward and cost-effective pricing, aligning with its automated functionality. Azure Data Factory, though perceived as more expensive due to its extensive capabilities, is considered worth the investment for those needing advanced and scalable solutions, offering significant ROI for enterprises with comprehensive data strategy requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (7th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 2.3%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Data Factory	2.3%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	96.9%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technologies

Drag-and-drop pipelines have saved days of work and now automate data movement and backfilling

If the AI features were more improved so that I don't have to provide each and every detail, Azure Data Factory could be improved in a much better way by improving the AI features. For example, if I want to fetch any data from a raw source, I need to provide each and every detail. But if I am just uploading my raw data and if AI will sync with that data, it can analyze that data and give me proper suggestions on how that should be done in a proper way. Automatic suggestions could improve in a much better way. As I have mentioned, the AI features as well as more drag-and-drop activities could be improved. If I am making a pipeline, it should give me suggestions, such as which activity should be used, so that I don't have to remember each activity. If I have used one activity, I shouldn't have to remember what activity should I use next. It should give auto-suggestions. That is why I have given a nine out of 10. Currently, I don't know about its governance and security, but in view of its improvement, I think Azure Data Factory should improve in these areas. As I already mentioned, the AI features should be improved. Also, the auto-suggestion features should also improve.

Read full review

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is an excellent tool for pipeline orchestration; connecting the different components and activities as well as gathering data."

"One of the most valuable features of Azure Data Factory is the drag-and-drop interface. This helps with workflow management because we can just drag any tables or data sources we need. Because of how easy it is to drag and drop, we can deliver things very quickly. It's more customizable through visual effect."

"The data mapping and the ability to systematically derive data are nice features. It worked really well for the solution we had. It is visual, and it did the transformation as we wanted."

"The function of the solution is great."

"The most valuable features are data transformations."

"Azure Data Factory's most valuable features are the packages and the data transformation that it allows us to do, which is more drag and drop, or a visual interface. So, that eases the entire process."

"The data flows were beneficial, allowing us to perform multiple transformations."

"The valuable feature of Azure Data Factory is its integration capability, as it goes well with other components of Microsoft Azure."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It is a scalable solution."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"There is always room to improve. There should be good examples of use that, of course, customers aren't always willing to share. It is Catch-22. It would help the user base if everybody had really good examples of deployments that worked, but when you ask people to put out their good deployments, which also includes me, you usually got, "No, I'm not going to do that." They don't have enough good examples. Microsoft probably just needs to pay one of their partners to build 20 or 30 examples of functional Data Factories and then share them as a user base."

"Azure Data Factory uses many resources and has issues with parallel workflows."

"They should work on optimizing their licensing model and pricing structure."

"The setup and configuration process could be simplified."

"The tool’s workflow is not user-friendly. It should also improve its orchestration monitoring."

"The support and the documentation can be improved."

"Integration of data lineage would be a nice feature in terms of DevOps integration. It would make implementation for a company much easier. I'm not sure if that's already available or not. However, that would be a great feature to add if it isn't already there."

"As far as customer service and support with Azure Data Factory, we are not always satisfied with the response time."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"Product is priced at the market standard."

"Pricing is comparable, it's somewhere in the middle."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"Azure Data Factory gives better value for the price than other solutions such as Informatica."

"The price is fair."

"There's no licensing for Azure Data Factory, they have a consumption payment model. How often you are running the service and how long that service takes to run. The price can be approximately $500 to $1,000 per month but depends on the scaling."

"The price you pay is determined by how much you use it."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	64

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Databricks vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 4% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

August 2026

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

August 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

No data available

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

Microsoft

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

August 2026

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.