Qlik Replicate vs Talend Data Management Platform comparison

"Low-priced reporting and analytics solution, with good scalability and stability. It has on-premises and cloud versions that are cohesive and can integrate well."

"From a technical perspective, this is an excellent product."

"The most valuable features of Qlik Replicate are its CDC performance and trigger functions. CDC feature is important to the financial industry."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

"It is only meant to capture data from the log files, get the data, and transfer it, read that table structure, create the table structure, and transfer the data whenever there is a change."

"Qlik Replicate stands out with its cutting-edge technology and its ability to handle diverse data management tasks. This powerful tool allows us to efficiently and swiftly load data into various data stores or destinations, while also enabling easy distribution across different endpoints. A notable feature is its capability to reload data from multiple sources by creating multiple tasks within a brief timeframe of fifteen to twenty minutes. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures quick data loading from different tables."

"The CDC and the flexibility to use QVD as a source are the most valuable features of Qlik Replicate."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

"Talend Studio has the ability to connect to almost anything to integrate data from files, databases, web services, etc."

"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."

"I think Talend is one of the easiest tools for faster implementation compared to other tools."

"I like everything about this product, but the biggest thing is the ease of use."

"The availability of connectors is great."

"The tool was mainly used for ETL processes to apply governance rules on data."

"We can develop our own code if we do not see the functionality we need."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to understand."

"In various scenarios, an important consideration is when we encounter issues and Qlik Replicate suggests reloading a specific table. If we face any problems or encounter errors with that table, it becomes necessary to make a change in Qlik Replicate. Performing a full reload every time is not feasible or practical. Instead, we should identify the specific issues and address them without repeating the entire reloading process. Based on this approach, we can investigate and resolve the problem by performing targeted loads from the source itself. This change aligns with my perspective and is something I would like to implement."

"We would like to see more details in messages about errors with the system."

"It would be better if the solution’s pricing were more obvious."

"This product could be improved by providing more insight regarding errors. One of our customers that uses Qlik Replicate has had an issue. We tried to debug it, but we could not trace the error message. The infrastructure site should give us more insight about errors. Qlik Replicate is not a business solution, it's an IT solution. The reporting tools and bug site should be improved."

"The product should improve its licensing limitation."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

"We'd like better connectivity."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"They lack in memory capacity."

"Performance and speed could be improved."

"We'd like to see more connectors it the future."

"Including either XML or JSON in the next release would definitely be a good transformation. I'm not sure if Talend has that feature, but it's one of those requirements that we are working around and have to do some parsing of XML so this could make it easier."

"The solution's memory sometimes bottlenecks and that can be challenging."

"The sales and market department could improve the Talend Data Management Platform."

"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."

"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

"The price is on a per-user basis. It's a little more expensive than other tools. There aren't any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

"The tool is cheap."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."