Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs Stackify comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Stackify are both solutions in the Log Management category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0, while Stackify is ranked #63. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.0% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Stackify’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud

Read 2 Quantum Smart-1 Cloud reviews

84 Views
23 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

212 Views
147 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Stackify and Quantum Smart-1 Cloud compete in application performance monitoring and cloud security analytics. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, justifying its higher price point.

Features: Stackify offers application performance monitoring, error tracking, and comprehensive insights, favored for simplicity. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud provides robust security analytics, cloud scalability, and a more expansive range of features, overshadowing Stackify's offerings.

Room for Improvement: Stackify can improve data visualization, simplify configurations, and enhance UX. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud needs more intuitive integrations, simpler analytics tools, and streamlined interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive support. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud has a complex setup due to extensive features but offers dedicated support to aid navigation.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify is cost-effective, offering good ROI for smaller enterprises focusing on application monitoring. Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is more expensive but provides significant long-term value for larger organizations seeking integrated, scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Stackify

Ranking in Log Management

63rd

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (62nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (57th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Ashish Upadhyay

Founder at BlockMosiac

Has efficient security measures and seamless integration capabilities

The product's user experience needs improvement. They could refine the interface and make the platform more intuitive and user-friendly for enterprises and developers. Additionally, improving integration capabilities with other blockchain networks and legacy systems would broaden its applicability and facilitate smoother integration into existing infrastructures. The platform should focus on being more developer-friendly and ensuring a user interface that is not overly tricky. Continuous optimization of performance and scalability to handle increasing workloads is crucial for seamless operation. Lastly, ongoing research and development efforts should remain vigilant against emerging threats to incorporate the latest advancements and solidify the platform's security.

Read full review

Moses Arigbede

Head of DevOps at Partsimony

Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure

They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud lies in its scalability, providing a secure infrastructure for enterprise applications."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the reporting and the traffic view that the product provides its users."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"The deployment is very fast."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

Cons

"VPN configuration can get clunky sometimes."

"They could refine the interface and make the platform more intuitive and user-friendly for enterprises and developers."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"The search feature could be improved."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to the on-premises solution, I rate Quantum Smart-1 Cloud's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Quantum Smart-1 Cloud stands out with its competitive pricing model, finely tuned to accommodate diverse user capabilities."

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quantum Smart-1 Cloud?

The most valuable feature of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud lies in its scalability, providing a secure infrastructure for enterprise applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quantum Smart-1 Cloud?

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud stands out with its competitive pricing model, finely tuned to accommodate diverse user capabilities. For organizations with fewer than 50 users, the monthly subscription prov...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quantum Smart-1 Cloud?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 43% of the time

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 40% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 17% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

March 2025

Download Quantum Smart-1 Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

March 2025

Download Stackify product report

Overview

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is designed for experts seeking advanced cloud solutions, offering specialized features and capabilities that cater to complex industry requirements while continuously seeking improvements.

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud delivers a robust platform tailored to meet the demands of tech-savvy users. It integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, enhancing operational efficiency and resource management. Users appreciate its scalability and customization options, making it a preferred choice for diverse applications. The continual updates ensure that Quantum Smart-1 Cloud stays ahead in meeting industry standards, although room for improvement remains in areas like onboarding and customer support to maximize user satisfaction.

What are the key features of Quantum Smart-1 Cloud?

Scalability: Easily adapt to increased workloads and expand capabilities as business needs grow.
Customization: Tailor the platform settings and functionalities to align with specific requirements.
Integration: Seamlessly connect with existing systems to improve workflow efficiency.
Security: Advanced security protocols protect data integrity and privacy.
Performance: Provides high-speed processing and reliability for critical applications.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational expenses through effective resource utilization.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes that save time and increase output.
Strategic Flexibility: Ability to quickly adapt to market changes with innovative solutions.
Data Security: Assures users of confidential data protection, leading to compliance with industry standards.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Quantum Smart-1 Cloud is implemented to optimize data management and ensure high-level security compliance. Firms leverage its analytical capabilities to gain insights and improve service delivery, while manufacturing sector uses it for seamless supply chain operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify

April 2025

Free Report: Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Quantum Smart-1 Cloud vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.