Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] vs Workspace ONE Intelligence comparison

Quest Software and Omnissa are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 86% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Omnissa users who would recommend it.

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Read 22 Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Read 1 Workspace ONE Intelligence review

142 Views
111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] and Workspace ONE Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: August 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 800,688 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (54th), Mobile APM (8th)

Featured Reviews

it_user409929

Senior Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Mar 21, 2016

We also gain some insight into our business partners performance and can often point out to them when they're having issues.

The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results. Additionally the ability to track both real and synthetic user performance and compare real to synthetic user performance as a baseline is important to us on several fronts; real users make human decisions and we can see how their performance compares to "perfect" synthetic users running scripts to do similar tasks. And because our synthetic users run consistently 24/7 we also can compare peak traffic performance to off peak performance.

Read full review

Muhammad JunaidJawed

Sr. VDI Engineer at Afiniti.com

Aug 12, 2024

Helps to find devices that are lost but improvement is needed in mapping

The tool's most valuable feature is its tunneling capability. It is good for inventory, encryption, device location, and kiosk mode. If a device is lost, you can find it. We integrated it with a third-party tool for one-time passwords and two-factor authentication. The user-friendly interface makes…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end."

"Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur."

"FxV is valuable as we can playback the session."

"Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable."

"The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

"Intuitive, Single-pane-of-glass dashboards for real-time statistics and long-term statistics for capacity management and in-depth analytics"

"It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers."

"Having standard monitoring features and a central repository saves us a lot of time and reduces risk of incidents."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is its tunneling capability. It is good for inventory, encryption, device location, and kiosk mode. If a device is lost, you can find it. We integrated it with a third-party tool for one-time passwords and two-factor authentication. The user-friendly interface makes device management easy."

Cons

"I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace."

"I would perhaps like to see more SSMS connections."

"It needs a more intuitive way to create and implement custom "Cartridges" to be deployed through out a Federated environment."

"SQL agents often failed but again this may have been addressed in future versions."

"We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

"I want to see mobile access application in the next release."

"I think installation and setup needs little more improvement especially when you are installing with external database."

"My only complaint from Foglight for monitoring is that you only get a plot for five minute average for metrics like CPU and Memory, on the application side I can see metrics more quickly at 15 seconds for metrics like active sessions, heap. I would like to see the same for CPU and memory."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] cons

"One area for improvement is location mapping - it uses Bing Maps instead of Google Maps, which isn't always up to date. Device enrollment can also be challenging, especially for older devices that need a factory reset."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is expensive for us."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"The solution is cost-effective. Workspace ONE Intelligence is neither cheap nor expensive. Compared to other tools like MaaS360, it Is more cost-effective. It costs about seven dollars per user, while others might cost $50—a big difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workspace ONE Intelligence?

The solution is cost-effective. Workspace ONE Intelligence is neither cheap nor expensive. Compared to other tools like MaaS360, it Is more cost-effective. It costs about seven dollars per user, wh...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workspace ONE Intelligence?

One area for improvement is location mapping - it uses Bing Maps instead of Google Maps, which isn't always up to date. Device enrollment can also be challenging, especially for older devices that ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workspace ONE Intelligence?

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Catchpoint vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 56% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 44% of the time

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2024

Download Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2024

Download Workspace ONE Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Foglight, Dell Foglight

Apteligent, Crittercism

Learn More

Video not available

Quest Software

Omnissa

Overview

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.

Get insights, guidelines, and preferred outcomes that will help you deliver the best possible mobile experience for your customers and help make your mobile business successful like never before.

When milliseconds can cost you millions, Apteligent reveals operational and usage trends, uncovers issues, and analyzes behaviors. This allows you to continuously improve apps, keep users happy, and put your mobile business at the top of its game.

Sample Customers

Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com

AT&T, Bloomberg, CNN, Experian, Fox, JC Penny, Urban Outfitters, Nokia, Lutron, NASCAR, T-Mobile, Urban Engines, Microsoft, Lego

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: August 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.