Ranorex Studio vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Ranorex and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,171 Views
2,406 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ranorex Studio and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (16th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Regression Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solution is stable."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

Cons

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Educational Organization

63%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

What do you like most about TestProject?

The script-less part of it was good for novice users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestProject?

The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool. They went commercial, and most of our work wasn't useful anymore. The support or the transition plans for people who were already using...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestProject?

We have a mobile app that we need to build regression testing packs, and we spent almost a year building quite a few test cases for automated testing on that mobile app so that they can run every d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 25% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 9% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

December 2024

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

November 2024

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Learn More

Ranorex

Tricentis

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.