Ranorex Studio vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."