Ranorex Studio vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

"Object identification is good."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The solution is free."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."