Ranorex Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"I'd like to know their testing strategies and to know what they can automate and what they can't. It can become pretty frustrating if you're trying to automate something that changes on a monthly or weekly basis."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"When Ranorex is upgraded, the compatibility with other projects, in version control, in-house or on-premise, fails on occasion. However, overall, the stability is good."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"Its price is a bit high."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."