Ranorex Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

Ranorex and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Ranorex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Ranorex holds a 4.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,023 Views
2,253 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 24 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,547 Views
1,543 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Ranorex Studio and UiPath Test Suite are competitors in the test automation category. UiPath Test Suite appears to have an edge due to strong mobile testing and integration features.

Features: Ranorex Studio offers Ranorex Spy, Ranorex Recorder, and robust object recognition, making test automation accessible for non-technical users. Advanced users can benefit from C# or VB.NET scripting capabilities and its integration with Jenkins and JIRA. UiPath Test Suite provides comprehensive integration services, document processing prowess, and a robust mobile testing framework, focusing on ease of use with tools like Task Capture.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio could expand its OS support beyond Windows, improve browser compatibility, and enhance load balancing tools. Users also wish for advanced mobile testing features. UiPath Test Suite might enhance its test manager functionality, better integrate manual testing processes, and improve reporting and complex data handling to lessen management burdens.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio is primarily on-premises with strong email and forum support, though its cloud deployment options are limited. UiPath Test Suite offers diverse deployment choices including cloud and hybrid options, appealing to businesses seeking flexibility. Both receive positive customer support feedback, but UiPath's broader deployment strategy caters to a wider user base.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio is costly but offers a robust feature set that provides good ROI by improving productivity, though the license cost can be high for small businesses. UiPath Test Suite, while expensive in terms of licensing, saves operational costs by boosting productivity through advanced features. Its pricing is justified by its extensive integration capabilities, offering solid ROI for enterprises fully utilizing its features.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (14th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.9%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"Object identification is good."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding."

"Easy integration with CI Tools like Jenkins, TFS, and TeamCity."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"Its price is a bit high."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 2% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 7% of the time

Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

February 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

February 2025

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.