Telerik Test Studio and ReadyAPI are application testing tools competing to improve testing processes. ReadyAPI seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, valuable for those seeking enhanced capabilities over cost efficiency.
Features: Telerik Test Studio offers intuitive test automation, integration flexibility, and rapid test creation across platforms. ReadyAPI, however, provides comprehensive API testing support, advanced scripting options, and extensive functional testing, which are particularly useful for detailed API interactions.
Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could enhance its advanced scripting and API testing capabilities. It also needs better scalability options for large testing environments. ReadyAPI might improve by offering a more competitive pricing model and simpler initial deployments. It could also enhance support for non-API related testing functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio is known for its straightforward setup and reliable customer support, making it accessible and easy to deploy. ReadyAPI provides a cloud-based deployment model, facilitating remote and collaborative access, with responsive customer service, which is beneficial for distributed teams.
Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio offers a competitive pricing structure with a lower initial setup cost, enabling a quicker ROI and appealing to budget-focused users. ReadyAPI, while requiring a higher upfront investment, delivers significant ROI through its advanced features and detailed API functionalities, making it a better choice for environments focused on extensive API testing.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.