Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs StarWind Virtual Tape Library comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.5
Opinions on Red Hat Ceph Storage support vary; some value it, others prefer community forums or internal solutions.
Sentiment score
8.5
StarWind Virtual Tape Library offers 24/7 prompt, knowledgeable support, ensuring high customer satisfaction and excellent problem resolution.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Red Hat Ceph Storage scales well with user feedback, though latency and planning challenges require consideration and deployment tools.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat Ceph Storage is highly reliable and stable, with minor issues in data rebalancing, latency, and recovery.
Sentiment score
9.0
StarWind Virtual Tape Library is rated highly for its stability and reliability over two years, ensuring successful backups.
 

Room For Improvement

Red Hat Ceph Storage faces challenges in performance, usability, documentation, integration, and resource optimization, needing various improvements.
StarWind Virtual Tape Library requires user-friendly updates, including simplified installation, better search, faster throughput, and comprehensive documentation.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers appreciated Red Hat Ceph Storage's reasonable pricing and flexible licensing, with the option for support depending on expertise.
StarWind Virtual Tape Library provides cost-effective enterprise solutions with Veeam support, covering setup and one year of maintenance.
 

Valuable Features

Red Hat Ceph Storage provides scalable, reliable, and flexible storage solutions with self-healing architecture and easy integration for various needs.
StarWind VTL integrates easily with Veeam, offers cost-effective cloud replication, and enhances secure storage management via virtual tapes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Ceph Storage
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (2nd)
StarWind Virtual Tape Library
Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)
11th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
HCI (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 19.9%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StarWind Virtual Tape Library is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
 

Featured Reviews

Prajwal Kabbinale - PeerSpot reviewer
Overall satisfied , with easy implementation ,having a notification feature would be helpful
Our primary use case is for integration with OpenStack for block and object storage We use both Red Hat Ceph and Azure storage, for all staging and non-production. Most of the features are beneficial and one does not stand out above the rest. The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure…
KellyVon Der Heyden - PeerSpot reviewer
Scalable solution with a good technical support team
We use the solution for data backups and ransomware protection The solution is compatible with cloud storage platforms, such as Amazon S3. Also, it efficiently reduces the storage cost for archiving. The solution's training process and online documentation could be more thorough. We have been…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?
The high availability of the solution is important to us.
What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?
Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.
What do you like most about StarWind Virtual Tape Library?
The solution made our backups way more reliable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StarWind Virtual Tape Library?
The pricing is surprisingly reasonable, and that includes the help to get it set up and running. They really want you to use their support get to get everything up and running.
What needs improvement with StarWind Virtual Tape Library?
I am not sure if this is a limitation of my physical hardware or if it is the software itself. However, I would like the throughput to be faster. Who would not like things to be faster? It would be...
 

Also Known As

Ceph
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dell, DreamHost
Volvo, Sony, Samsung, Hitachi
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. StarWind Virtual Tape Library and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.