Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Riversand MDMCenter vs TIBCO EBX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Riversand MDMCenter
Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO EBX
Ranking in Master Data Management (MDM) Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Master Data Management (MDM) Software category, the mindshare of Riversand MDMCenter is 1.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO EBX is 12.8%, up from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
 

Featured Reviews

SS
A user-friendly data management software with a valuable matching feature
Integration could be better. Riversand is majorly focusing on only the MDM hub part. They don't have their own integration platform. We have to rely on a third-party integration partner. They say this is the format, and it's the client's responsibility to bring the data into their required format. They have to have an integration partner and develop their integration capabilities. It's not so flexible to read any data format or system, for example, SAP. They don't have a connector.
Lourens Janse Van Rensburg - PeerSpot reviewer
An MDM tool that offers stability, scalability, and an easy setup phase
Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX. It would be great to use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX. Right now, TIBCO EBX only supports Java, but I believe that it should support SQL queries on its interface. In short, certain areas in the UI area can be improved to support SQL queries.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Has a good user interface and the ability to update large sets of products quickly."
"I like their matching feature, and the survivorship rules are very strong. I also like their out-of-box reports, data quality dashboards, and more. Those are also very handy and helpful. Internally, I like the kind of configurations that we can create, validations, and enhancements. Those configurations are pretty straightforward and useful. It's a user-friendly tool that is very cool."
"It's a stable solution. I have no complaints."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
 

Cons

"Integration could be better. Riversand is majorly focusing on only the MDM hub part. They don't have their own integration platform. We have to rely on a third-party integration partner. They say this is the format, and it's the client's responsibility to bring the data into their required format. They have to have an integration partner and develop their integration capabilities. It's not so flexible to read any data format or system, for example, SAP. They don't have a connector."
"The solution does not have a good match and search capability."
"The ability to create bespoke workflows could be improved."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"Everything is updated through forms, and working with UI web forms. It's more record-based processing. It is not mass-based processing. This is one of the things that are not good for TIBCO EBX. Another problem is we cannot join tables and prepare a view where the tables are joined. Someone can code it but it is not a feature of the solution without code. You have to take data from a table, combine it with data from another table and then present it. This could be done better."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
"The documentation needs improvement."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Riversand MDMCenter isn't expensive. I believe their price is in the mid-range."
"TIBCO EBX is a very expensive solution. There is an annual fee to use the solution."
"I'm just involved in technical, but I understand that its pricing is similar to HP so it is quite expensive."
"TIBCO EBX is cheaper than Informatica."
"The price of TIBCO EBX is too high. The solution can only be used in a project that has good sponsorship that can afford it."
"This solution is costly compared to other products on the market, but this is due to the complete functionality that is provided. The pricing model is very straightforward, and is worked out on a pay-per- instance basis, and only applies to active instances."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Pharma/Biotech Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riversand MDMCenter?
I like their matching feature, and the survivorship rules are very strong. I also like their out-of-box reports, data quality dashboards, and more. Those are also very handy and helpful. Internally...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riversand MDMCenter?
Riversand MDMCenter isn't expensive. I believe their price is in the mid-range.
What needs improvement with Riversand MDMCenter?
Integration could be better. Riversand is majorly focusing on only the MDM hub part. They don't have their own integration platform. We have to rely on a third-party integration partner. They say t...
What needs improvement with TIBCO EBX?
We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO EBX?
My company's clients negotiate directly with TIBCO when it comes to the cost attached to the licensing part.
What do you like most about Orchestra Networks EBX?
It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
 

Also Known As

No data available
TIBCO MDM, Orchestra Networks EBX
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Topco, PC Connection, Balsam Brands, Nivea, Eucerin, Tine, Schneider Electric, Miller, ExxonMobil, Baxter, ConocoPhillips, Cameron International, Chevron, Husky Energy, Saint-Gobain, Fingerhut
BNL, SunGard, TUI Group, Uti Worldwide, Yellow Pages Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Riversand MDMCenter vs. TIBCO EBX and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.