Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SafeBreach vs Verodin comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SafeBreach
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Verodin
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
11th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of SafeBreach is 7.6%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Verodin is 1.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

Dmytro Petrashchuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 14, 2022
Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data
This is a breach and attach simulation solution and we use it to test different security tools and to check how effective our client's infrastructure is.  The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods. It can run different attacks in a safe manner without…
reviewer945171 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 22, 2020
Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine
The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it seem like it was easy, it wasn't easy. There was a lot of stuff that we had to do that we ended up having to do via an API or something special for a new case. That's a big issue for me. Integration is daunting. It leaves a lot of room for failure and frustration. There are just little nuances that make everything difficult. You're supposed to be able to flip this toggle thing here, and you're supposed to be able to get the feedthrough from Splunk. Then, from there everything should be perfectly fine. However, when you find out it is not perfectly fine and you find out that it's because this thing isn't necessarily correct, you have to do an update on it or they have to update their file to make it work correctly. It's very small, minute things that aren't quite right. It's not something that you can really pinpoint. There's a lot of nuanced issues. It the nuanced technical issues that you would notice once you cross its path. It's not one of those "Hey, this is something I would know off the top of my head." They are very small nuance issues that make you say "Oh, well I guess we've got to go and change this thing now." You get this with certain tools - mostly with Mandiant tools more than anything else in general. It's one of those Mandiant quirks that still carries on and persists to this day - even with this tool.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
"The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SafeBreach?
The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SafeBreach?
The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
What needs improvement with SafeBreach?
I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.