SAS Data Integration Server vs WhereScape RED comparison

SAS and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.5, while WhereScape is ranked #45. SAS holds a 0.6% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

SAS Data Integration Server

Read 4 SAS Data Integration Server reviews

779 Views
584 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,695 Views
1,356 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAS Data Integration Server

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and SAS Data Integration Server are competitors in the data integration and warehousing industry. WhereScape RED has the upper hand for cost-effective solutions and fast deployment, while SAS Data Integration Server appeals to those needing extensive capabilities.

Features: WhereScape RED offers automation, rapid development, and ease of use. It enables quick deployment of data warehouses with minimal complexity. SAS Data Integration Server provides robust data transformation abilities and extensive integration options, suited for complex data needs. SAS offers a comprehensive toolkit for detailed data management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED provides a straightforward deployment, reducing downtime and resource usage. Its customer service is prompt and effective. SAS Data Integration Server has a more elaborate deployment, often needing specialized support. SAS supports detailed assistance and comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED's lower setup costs and rapid deployment deliver favorable ROI quickly, benefiting cost-conscious businesses. SAS Data Integration Server demands a higher initial investment but provides substantial ROI through advanced features, ideal for substantial integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Data Integration Server

Ranking in Data Integration

37th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Data Integration Server is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2937544

Works at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offloads processes on the server side but needs better installation syntax

One area for improvement is the installation process. Another point could be the syntax, as it sometimes involves using syntax names that are not intuitive. For example, to calculate the difference between two dates, the general syntax in SAS is called the data difference or data net function. However, another name is used, such as NF and INK. Without knowledge of SAS programming, it becomes unclear what these functions mean. It is not good to define function names this way.

Read full review

reviewer1618884

BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Quick to set up, flexible, and stable

The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."

"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"The solution is very stable."

"WhereScape RED has improved our business's ability to generate needed reporting without requiring a large team of developers to manually code all of the necessary plumbing."

"The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code."

"Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."

"It has a built-in automatic scheduling environment."

"WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database."

"Data transformations and rollups are easy to accomplish."

"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

"I like the data vault implementations."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."

"So I would like to see improved integration with other software."

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"One area for improvement is the installation process."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

"Technical support isn't the best."

"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it."

"Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved."

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."

"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive program."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAS Data Integration Server?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Integration Server?

I don't handle the cost and budget part. From the tool's perspective, I can say that it is an amazing product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Integration Server?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SSIS vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 31% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 24% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Glue vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 13% of the time

More SAS Data Integration Server Competitors

dbt vs WhereScape RED

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 14% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

erwin Data Catalog by Quest vs WhereScape RED

Compared 12% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 11% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Download SAS Data Integration Server product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

June 2025

Download WhereScape RED product report

Also Known As

SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, Enterprise Data Integration Server

No data available

Overview

SAS Data Integration Server is a powerful, configurable and comprehensive solution that can meet a wide variety of data integration requirements, from small tactical projects to strategic business initiatives. It can access virtually all data sources, support data warehousing, migration, synchronization, federation and provisioning initiatives. It can support both batch-oriented and real-time master data management solutions. It can create reusable data integration services in support of service-oriented architectures and data governance and extract, cleanse, transform, conform, aggregate, load and manage data.

SAS

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED

July 2025

Free Report: SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Data Integration Server vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.