Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WhereScape RED Logo

Top 10 WhereScape RED Alternatives

Vendor: WhereScape
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WhereScape RED Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WhereScape RED based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and Informatica PowerCenter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WhereScape Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WhereScape, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automation, supporting fast data warehousing with minimal manual work, appealing to those prioritizing efficiency. In comparison, Informatica IDMC's strong data integration across platforms attracts businesses needing comprehensive management solutions despite its higher price and integration challenges.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) involves a more complex installation at a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) involves a more complex installation at a higher price point.
WhereScape RED Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automation, reducing manual tasks and offering automated documentation. In comparison, Azure Data Factory provides superior scalability with cloud-based transformations and data connectors. WhereScape RED is priced competitively, while Azure Data Factory's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED typically offers lower setup costs, focusing on automation, while Azure Data Factory may involve higher initial costs due to its scale and integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED typically offers lower setup costs, focusing on automation, while Azure Data Factory may involve higher initial costs due to its scale and integration capabilities.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter is known for its robust data integration, transformation tools, and metadata management, serving large-scale needs. In comparison, WhereScape RED offers automation and rapid prototyping for efficiency and speed, appealing with streamlined deployment and competitive pricing for quick ROI.
Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. WhereScape RED Report
Informatica PowerCenter has a higher setup cost compared to the more cost-effective WhereScape RED, providing a budget-friendly alternative for organizations considering both options.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter has a higher setup cost compared to the more cost-effective WhereScape RED, providing a budget-friendly alternative for organizations considering both options.
WhereScape RED Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automation, offering rapid data warehouse development and comprehensive support for methodologies like Data Vault. In comparison, SSIS integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems, supporting various data sources and providing custom scripting capabilities for Microsoft-centric environments.
Download SSIS vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, while SSIS generally incurs lower initial expenses but might have hidden complexities. Differences in setup cost highlight contrasting approaches to user experience and budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, while SSIS generally incurs lower initial expenses but might have hidden complexities. Differences in setup cost highlight contrasting approaches to user experience and budget considerations.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator offers flexibility for complex data integrations with its powerful ETL capabilities. In comparison, WhereScape RED enhances efficiency with automation features. Tech buyers may prefer Oracle for its versatility or WhereScape for rapid deployment and simplified processes.
Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. WhereScape RED Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves higher setup costs, offering a more expensive implementation. In contrast, WhereScape RED provides a more cost-effective setup process, making it a financially appealing choice for budget-conscious implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves higher setup costs, offering a more expensive implementation. In contrast, WhereScape RED provides a more cost-effective setup process, making it a financially appealing choice for budget-conscious implementations.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
3.9 out of 5
WhereScape RED provides automation for data warehouses with metadata-driven development, appealing to those seeking agile solutions. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage offers robust data integration and scalability, attracting those needing powerful ETL functions and handling large data volumes efficiently.
Download IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. WhereScape RED Report
High-cost of ownership: They could take a page from open source software.
Pricing varies based on use, and it is not as costly as some competing enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
High-cost of ownership: They could take a page from open source software.
Pricing varies based on use, and it is not as costly as some competing enterprise solutions.
WhereScape RED Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels with automation, reducing manual coding, and providing comprehensive documentation. In comparison, Talend Open Studio offers extensive integration capabilities with many connectors. WhereScape RED is favored for cost-effectiveness, while Talend's open-source version appeals to those needing flexibility.
Download Talend Open Studio vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED requires a substantial initial investment, while Talend Open Studio offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users. The stark cost difference highlights WhereScape RED's positioning for enterprises versus Talend's appeal to smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED requires a substantial initial investment, while Talend Open Studio offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users. The stark cost difference highlights WhereScape RED's positioning for enterprises versus Talend's appeal to smaller teams.
WhereScape RED Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automation and ease of use, appealing to those seeking efficient development. In comparison, SAP Data Services emphasizes flexibility and integration, attracting buyers focused on robust data integration and transformation. Both deliver strong return on investment through enhanced data processes.
Download SAP Data Services vs. WhereScape RED Report
Pricing is good, there is no problem.
The pricing is a little high to make the product more competetive in the marketplace.
View comparison
Pricing
Pricing is good, there is no problem.
The pricing is a little high to make the product more competetive in the marketplace.
WhereScape RED Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automation, reducing manual effort with features like automated documentation and metadata-driven development. In comparison, Qlik Replicate offers real-time data replication and efficient change data capture, making it ideal for low-latency tasks and scalable operations.
Download Qlik Replicate vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED's setup cost is generally higher, highlighting its comprehensive features, while Qlik Replicate offers a more affordable setup, catering to smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED's setup cost is generally higher, highlighting its comprehensive features, while Qlik Replicate offers a more affordable setup, catering to smaller budgets.
WhereScape RED Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED offers cost-effectiveness and automation for efficient ETL processes. In comparison, Denodo provides advanced data virtualization for seamless integration in enterprise environments. WhereScape's flexibility suits varied infrastructure needs, while Denodo's robust capabilities cater to high-demand data management.
Download Denodo vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED has a straightforward setup cost, while Denodo's setup cost is more flexible, offering a pay-as-you-go option which highlights the key pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED has a straightforward setup cost, while Denodo's setup cost is more flexible, offering a pay-as-you-go option which highlights the key pricing difference between the two solutions.
WhereScape RED Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Fivetran
4.0 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in ETL automation and impact analysis for complex data tasks. In comparison, Fivetran provides effortless data integration with real-time capabilities. WhereScape attracts users seeking cost-effective development, while Fivetran appeals to those needing cloud flexibility and manageable service efficiency.
Download Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED Report
Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated.
I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors.
View comparison
Pricing
Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated.
I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors.
WhereScape RED Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
WhereScape RED is favored for its metadata-driven automation and support for agile development methodologies, perfect for complex data warehouse tasks. In comparison, Alteryx Designer offers intuitive drag-and-drop features and robust analytics, ideal for data preparation and connecting to multiple data sources.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED's setup cost is considered lower compared to Alteryx Designer, offering budget-friendly options with efficient implementation; Alteryx Designer, while higher in cost, provides robust features preferred by larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED's setup cost is considered lower compared to Alteryx Designer, offering budget-friendly options with efficient implementation; Alteryx Designer, while higher in cost, provides robust features preferred by larger enterprises.
WhereScape RED Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automating data warehousing with templates and metadata-driven development, enhancing productivity. In comparison, FME provides broad format compatibility and spatial data support, appealing to those with diverse data transformation needs seeking flexibility over automation.
Download FME vs. WhereScape RED Report
The product's price is reasonable.
FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000.
View comparison
Pricing
The product's price is reasonable.
FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System
4.5 out of 5
WhereScape RED is ideal for rapid deployment and easy management, appealing to organizations prioritizing quick setup and support. In comparison, Ab Initio Co>Operating System attracts businesses with complex data needs, offering advanced features like scalability and metadata management despite a more involved deployment process.
Download Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED offers a low upfront setup cost, while Ab Initio Co>Operating System requires a higher initial investment. This difference is significant, highlighting the budget-friendly nature of WhereScape RED for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED offers a low upfront setup cost, while Ab Initio Co>Operating System requires a higher initial investment. This difference is significant, highlighting the budget-friendly nature of WhereScape RED for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
4.0 out of 5
Pentaho Data Integration is ideal for beginners with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface and open-source flexibility. In comparison, WhereScape RED appeals to enterprises through its structured metadata-driven approach and superior documentation, enhancing efficient management in large-scale environments.
Download Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs. WhereScape RED Report
There is a good open source option (Community Edition)​.
The price of the regular version is not reasonable and it should be lower.
View comparison
Pricing
There is a good open source option (Community Edition)​.
The price of the regular version is not reasonable and it should be lower.
WhereScape RED Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels at automating data warehouse management through agile, metadata-driven processes, ideal for efficient collaboration. In comparison, Qlik Compose prioritizes real-time data integration and user-friendly operations, suitable for environments needing intuitive data modeling and lifecycle management.
Download Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED involves a moderate setup cost, focusing on robust capabilities, while Qlik Compose presents a simpler setup process, aligning with users seeking ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED involves a moderate setup cost, focusing on robust capabilities, while Qlik Compose presents a simpler setup process, aligning with users seeking ease of use.
WhereScape RED Logo
dbt
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
dbt
3.8 out of 5
WhereScape RED offers end-to-end automation and integration with existing IT systems, attracting those valuing traditional deployment. In comparison, dbt's modular workflows and cloud-native approach appeal to organizations seeking agile transformation, integrated databases, and quicker ROI despite potentially higher initial setup requirements.
Download WhereScape RED vs. dbt Report
WhereScape RED's setup cost is often seen as higher compared to dbt's more budget-friendly option, which suits smaller budgets better.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED's setup cost is often seen as higher compared to dbt's more budget-friendly option, which suits smaller budgets better.
WhereScape RED Logo
Toad Data Point
4.5 out of 5
WhereScape RED Logo
Toad Data Point
4.5 out of 5
WhereScape RED emphasizes affordability and efficient deployment, ideal for budget-conscious organizations prioritizing cost. In comparison, Toad Data Point offers a wide array of features and deep analytics, appealing to those seeking comprehensive functionality despite higher initial costs.
Download Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED Report
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup cost, while Toad Data Point features a more complex pricing structure. The clear cost contrast highlights WhereScape RED's simplicity compared to Toad Data Point's detailed investment planning.
View comparison
Pricing
WhereScape RED offers a straightforward setup cost, while Toad Data Point features a more complex pricing structure. The clear cost contrast highlights WhereScape RED's simplicity compared to Toad Data Point's detailed investment planning.
WhereScape RED Logo
WhereScape RED Logo
ibi Open Data Hub for Mainframe
5.0 out of 5

The ibi Open Data Hub for Mainframe offers streamlined access to mainframe data directly within chosen BI tools, simplifying a traditionally cumbersome process. It enables real-time analysis of mainframe data, eliminating delays associated with data warehouse updates. Compatible with various BI tools like Tableau and Power BI, it ensures flexibility in software selection. Security protocols maintain data integrity, and features ensure data availability and reliability. Key benefits include improved data availability, simplified retrieval processes, enhanced analytics capabilities, and modernization without data migration.

View comparison

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Business Process Management (BPM)