Fivetran vs WhereScape RED comparison

Fivetran and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.9, while WhereScape is ranked #47. Fivetran holds a 2.2% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

3,638 Views
2,518 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,674 Views
1,147 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Fivetran

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and Fivetran cater to different aspects of data management, excelling in specific areas. WhereScape RED shines in environments demanding high automation and quality assurance, whereas Fivetran is preferred for its simplicity and robust replication capabilities.

Features: WhereScape RED offers data warehouse automation with metadata-driven development, extensive documentation, and support for agile methods. Fivetran provides managed pipelines, easy integration with various data sources, and the ability to manage connectors individually.

Room for Improvement: WhereScape RED could improve its performance, scalability, change data capture support, and multi-database environment flexibility. Fivetran might enhance data pipeline observability, offer more connector options, and provide more competitive pricing and customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED allows deployment in on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments, with highly praised customer service. Fivetran is primarily deployed in public and hybrid clouds, with a simpler deployment process due to its cloud-centric design, providing good customer service.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED offers cost-effective licensing based on developer seats, facilitating scalability and swift ROI due to quick development cycles. Fivetran's consumption-based pricing can be expensive for high-volume usage, making it less affordable for smaller enterprises, with ROI being usage-dependent.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

47th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

it_user584544

Manager Data Warehousing at a university with 10,001+ employees

The architecture is based on metadata and documentation is automated.

I would love to see a GUI interface for defining dependencies between build processes. RED provides a spreadsheet like interface for defining the dependencies between builds. Once the dependencies are defined, RED can produce a nice dependency diagram to give a visualization of the dependency tree. It would be easier to define complex dependency relationships if the dependency diagram were interactive. Our legacy ETL tool provided this GUI dependency definition via a drag and drop diagram which was very useful. The solution provided by WhereScape does work, and the dependency diagrams generated are helpful. It would just be nice to have the ability to define dependencies via a diagram, since dependencies relationships are much easier to understand via a diagram.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

More Fivetran pros

"WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database."

"It has a built-in automatic scheduling environment."

"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

"Naturally produces a way to easily debug your DW data solutions."

"The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code."

"This is a fantastically robust DW tool that will make you at least 10 times faster in producing a DW."

"WhereScape RED has improved our business's ability to generate needed reporting without requiring a large team of developers to manually code all of the necessary plumbing."

"Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"Some of the pain points we're looking at are trying to integrate some of the items in the Microsoft stack, so SharePoint and Excel, and then some of the newer Azure services."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

More Fivetran cons

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."

"Customization could be better."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

"Technical support isn't the best."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"ROI is at least 10 times."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Confluent vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 18% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 18% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 11% of the time

Matillion ETL vs WhereScape RED

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs WhereScape RED

Compared 5% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

February 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

February 2025

Download WhereScape RED product report

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED

February 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.