Qlik Compose vs WhereScape RED comparison

Qlik and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.9, while WhereScape is ranked #49. Qlik holds a 1.2% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,792 Views
1,397 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,992 Views
1,358 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Qlik Compose and WhereScape RED based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

49th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

May 5, 2023

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

reviewer1618884

BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 9, 2021

Quick to set up, flexible, and stable

The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It's a stable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

More Qlik Compose pros

"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

"RED has provided us the ability to integrate, stage, and transform data from diverse sources into an enterprise-grade data warehouse which meets the needs of my organization, but it also enables us to easily and quickly make ETL or DW changes."

"I found the initial setup very easy."

"WhereScape's deployment package is a fantastic feature. The application allows for selecting specific objects that you would like to deploy from one environment to another rather than deploying the entire database."

"The tool supports multiple target update methods."

"I like the data vault implementations."

"It has a built-in automatic scheduling environment."

"RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"There could be more customization options."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."

"Customization could be better."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

"Technical support isn't the best."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 58% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 4% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 21% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 21% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 10% of the time

Matillion ETL vs WhereScape RED

Compared 10% of the time

Fivetran vs WhereScape RED

Compared 7% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

October 2024

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

October 2024

Download WhereScape RED product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

No data available

Learn More

Qlik

Video not available

WhereScape

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

October 2024

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.