Toad Data Point vs WhereScape RED comparison

Quest Software and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Quest Software is ranked #29 with an average rating of 9.0, while WhereScape is ranked #48. Quest Software holds a 0.5% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

Toad Data Point

Read 3 Toad Data Point reviews

559 Views
442 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,533 Views
1,040 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Toad Data Point

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and Toad Data Point compete in data management and analysis tools. In features, Toad Data Point is more versatile due to its analytics and reporting capabilities.

Features: WhereScape RED offers automation capabilities, simplifying data warehousing processes and saving time. It also minimizes manual efforts. Toad Data Point has robust analytics and reporting features that enhance data exploration and visualization. These features make Toad Data Point a more comprehensive tool for advanced data analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED allows for easy deployment with attentive customer service that addresses technical issues promptly. Toad Data Point, despite its notable functionalities, may present a steeper learning curve and relies on self-service resources for user support. WhereScape RED's direct and personalized assistance facilitates smooth implementation and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED is cost-effective, offering more affordable initial setup costs appealing to businesses prioritizing cost efficiency and faster ROI. Toad Data Point, although requiring higher upfront investment, delivers significant value through advanced features, benefiting those who prioritize extensive data analysis functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Toad Data Point

Ranking in Data Integration

29th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Preparation Tools (5th)

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Toad Data Point is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Aaron Payne

ERP Manager at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offers power developers the tooling they need

I am not the end user of this solution. I am not close enough to it because I manage the platform that it runs against. The end users who use the Toad tool come against the database that my team manages, so it is hard for me to provide any area for improvement when it comes to the Toad tool. However, in the administration case, cost is a significant issue. The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly.

Read full review

it_user584544

Manager Data Warehousing at a university with 10,001+ employees

The architecture is based on metadata and documentation is automated.

I would love to see a GUI interface for defining dependencies between build processes. RED provides a spreadsheet like interface for defining the dependencies between builds. Once the dependencies are defined, RED can produce a nice dependency diagram to give a visualization of the dependency tree. It would be easier to define complex dependency relationships if the dependency diagram were interactive. Our legacy ETL tool provided this GUI dependency definition via a drag and drop diagram which was very useful. The solution provided by WhereScape does work, and the dependency diagrams generated are helpful. It would just be nice to have the ability to define dependencies via a diagram, since dependencies relationships are much easier to understand via a diagram.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

"We love it."

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"I like the data vault implementations."

"The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code."

"This is a fantastically robust DW tool that will make you at least 10 times faster in producing a DW."

"Naturally produces a way to easily debug your DW data solutions."

"WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

"I found the initial setup very easy."

"Data transformations and rollups are easy to accomplish."

"Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"Customization could be better."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"The ability to execute SSIS projects within WhereScape would be nice because we have a lot of packages that are too cumbersome to recreate."

"Jobs cannot be deleted via the deployment package. When deploying from dev to QA or production, a job has to be retired. The job has to be manually removed from the target environment."

"No support for change data capture or delta detection - that must be custom coded ."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Healthcare Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Point?

The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Point?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Point?

We primarily use Toad Data Point for end users where SQL Developer does not provide sufficient tooling. Toad Data Point offers better SQL development tools compared to SQL Developer, making it the ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SSIS vs Toad Data Point

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Toad Data Point

Compared 17% of the time

Alteryx vs Toad Data Point

Compared 17% of the time

Teradata vs Toad Data Point

Compared 15% of the time

SAS Enterprise Guide vs Toad Data Point

Compared 15% of the time

More Toad Data Point Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 19% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 15% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 13% of the time

dbt vs WhereScape RED

Compared 9% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs WhereScape RED

Compared 4% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point

March 2025

Download Toad Data Point product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

March 2025

Download WhereScape RED product report

Overview

Toad Data Point is a cross-platform, self-service, data-integration tool that simplifies data access, preparation and provisioning. It provides nearly limitless data connectivity, desktop data integration, visual query building and workflow automation.

Quest Software

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

Concordia University

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED

February 2025

Free Report: Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Toad Data Point vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.