Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Selenium HQ vs Testim comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Selenium HQ significantly reduced testing time and cost, enhancing efficiency and cross-browser capabilities with notable savings and automation benefits.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim's customer service is responsive and effective, providing quick assistance and high-quality support, especially for technical issues.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
Testim offers effective scalability for varying user needs, resolving initial cost challenges and supporting medium organizations and DevOps teams.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Testim users report high stability and reliability, with minimal issues and unaffected outcomes from numerous code changes.
 

Room For Improvement

Testim requires improvements in UI efficiency, feature customization, comprehensive documentation, stability, and cost effectiveness for enhanced testing capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find Testim cost-effective, appreciating its fixed pricing model and value compared to competitors with minimal extra costs.
 

Valuable Features

Testim offers record/playback, algorithm support, REST API, CLI integration, and AI features for efficient testing with ease.
 

Categories and Ranking

Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (4th)
Testim
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
12th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.4%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AdityaRanbhare - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosts browser testing efficiency with WebDriver and multi-browser compatibility
The most valuable features of Selenium HQ include WebDriver and the remote framework, which is compatible with Selenium and is mostly helpful for me. Selenium HQ's compatibility with multiple browsers impacts my testing efficiency significantly, as it allows me to run tests on various browsers and generate comparative analysis reports. Selenium automates browsers easily with its web driver, and Selenium IDE facilitates end-to-end testing with its command and control flows.
Dheeraj Bavirisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code
We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
Selenium is easy to install and mostly free, so there's no need for a license. This lack of costs makes it an attractive option.
What do you like most about Testim?
The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?
I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.
What needs improvement with Testim?
There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SeleniumHQ
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.